• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"Pre-Planned" Flight causes chaos in NYC today

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know WSJ / Dow Jones offices at 3 WFC were evacuated this morning, per my former co-workers there.
 
“Last week, I approved a mission over New York," Louis Caldera, director of the White House military office, said. "I take responsibility for that decision. While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it’s clear that the mission created confusion and disruption. I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused.”

Tell me that was a mere "photo op".

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090427/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_low_flying_plane_purpose

"An administration official says a presidential Boeing 747 and a fighter jet flew low near ground zero in New York City Monday because the White House Military Office wanted to update its file photo of the president's plane near the Statue of Liberty.

This official said the White House Military Office told the Federal Aviation Administration that it periodically updates file photos of Air Force One near national landmarks, like the statute in New York harbor and the Grand Canyon."

:lol
 
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A White House official apologized Monday after a low-flying Boeing 747 spotted above the Manhattan skyline frightened workers and residents into evacuating buildings.

The huge aircraft, which functions as Air Force One when the president is aboard, was taking part in a classified, government-sanctioned photo shoot, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

Our government cannot be that stupid :lol .
 
Joe Shlabotnik said:
I have a stupid question.

Why wouldn't they announce that it was actually a drill after it was over? Rather than, you know, looking completely ridiculous.

Cause saying it was a drill AFTER would make them look worst? Saying it was a mistake gets the thing done and done and they move on, especially when Caldera takes responsibility right away.

At worst it was really a photo op, but really, that's retarded, and you'd think they would have explained it.
 
Cloudy said:
Why would they need fighter jets for a photo op? Saying it was a drill would make them look less moronic..

For pictures like this:

2ueplpv.jpg
 
"the White House Military Office wanted to update its file photo of the president's plane near the Statue of Liberty."

File photo? Update? :lol
 
Ether_Snake said:
Cause saying it was a drill AFTER would make them look worst? Saying it was a mistake gets the thing done and done and they move on, especially when Caldera takes responsibility right away.

So they were willing to cause a minor-bordering-on-major panic to test our preparedness in the vanishingly small chance that terrorists attempt to attack using the exact same method they did last time even though it's the only scenario we can actually anticipate now.
 
xbhaskarx said:
"the White House Military Office wanted to update its file photo of the president's plane near the Statue of Liberty."

File photo? Update? :lol

How much do you think it cost?

Obviously you have the costs to both the 747 and the fighter jet, then you interrupt the most congested and convoluted airspace in the world, then you inadvertently cause unknown economic loses by shutting down several buildings.

Compared to the cost of a good photoshop.
 
Ether_Snake said:

:lol , damn.

Yeah, this isn't a photo op. That's fucking retarded. This was a practice run of some sort. Why, for what, who knows, but it wasn't to snap a pretty picture. And it was fucking stupid to throw New Yorkers off guard like that. That's really cruel and horrible.

idahoblue said:
So much paranoia in this thread.

idahoblue
I got p 2 tha owned
p-o-w-n-e-d

(Today, 02:41 AM)

See Ether_Snake's post, and see fucking retarded act with even more retarded justification.
 
Gallbaro said:
How much do you think it cost?

Obviously you have the costs to both the 747 and the fighter jet, then you interrupt the most congested and convoluted airspace in the world, then you inadvertently cause unknown economic loses by shutting down several buildings.

Compared to the cost of a good photoshop.
I know, right?

It's not like the government would ever go out of their way to be inefficient or something!
 
jonnybryce said:
idahoblue
I got p 2 tha owned
p-o-w-n-e-d

(Today, 02:41 AM)

See Ether_Snake's post, and see fucking retarded act with even more retarded justification.
That's what you've got? Insecurity, lashing out, and a tag quote? Go cower under your blankets. :lol :lol
 
idahoblue said:
Never denied that, but the conspiracies are flying free in here.


I think I am agreeing with you. Anyone who read CNN.com this week read tons of stories about Whitehouse photography projects. I'm not saying a conspiracy isn't possible, I'm just saying that pulling off this test successfully is far less likely than the Occam's razor here:

It just happened like they said.


I would actually agree with the "test" theory here, if it wasn't for the fact that such a test would hardly require Airforce One. Only one thing would require that. A Photo of Airforce One over NY.

Same panic could have been achieved with vanilla 747 and an airline cover story.
 
Also, honestly? The government doesn't give a shit about office evacuations. That's the city's responsibility at most and really just each individual company/building's responsibility. The government is not going to loan out Air Force One just to see how fast lower Manhattan can empty out. Which, by the way, emptied itself out surprisingly quickly and safely on 9/11.

I work right next to Ground Zero and our building has this wacky way of preparing for an emergency: fire drills. Whether it's fire, blackout, or 7 World Trade collapsing again, the procedure is the same.
 
Joe Shlabotnik said:
Also, honestly? The government doesn't give a shit about office evacuations. That's the city's responsibility at most and really just each individual company/building's responsibility. The government is not going to loan out Air Force One just to see how fast lower Manhattan can empty out. Which, by the way, emptied itself out surprisingly quickly and safely on 9/11.

I work right next to Ground Zero and our building has this wacky way of preparing for an emergency: fire drills. Whether it's fire, blackout, or 7 World Trade collapsing again, the procedure is the same.

An attack on America will directly be blamed on the Government as them not doing enough to keep us safe. The more deaths the worse it looks for them.
 
idahoblue said:
That's what you've got? Insecurity, lashing out, and a tag quote? Go cower under your blankets. :lol :lol

If you can't see it, then nothing I can say will make you see it. You've chosen your side, why waste my time? I don't mind if someone on the internet doesn't agree with me, I don't need to persuade you. I don't mind taking a moment to lol at you, though.
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
I think I am agreeing with you. Anyone who read CNN.com this week read tons of stories about Whitehouse photography projects. I'm not saying a conspiracy isn't possible, I'm just saying that pulling off this test successfully is far less likely than the Occam's razor here:

It just happened like they said.


I would actually agree with the "test" theory here, if it wasn't for the fact that such a test would hardly require Airforce One. Only one thing would require that. A Photo of Airforce One over NY.

Same panic could have been achieved with vanilla 747 and an airline cover story.

What airline company? How do you get some airline company to make up some story like that? Really. The military would have had to have some airline company part of some plan to have a jet escorted over NY, in secrecy.

You're the ones with the conspiracy theories :lol
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
I think I am agreeing with you. Anyone who read CNN.com this week read tons of stories about Whitehouse photography projects. I'm not saying a conspiracy isn't possible, I'm just saying that pulling off this test successfully is far less likely than the Occam's razor here:

It just happened like they said.


I would actually agree with the "test" theory here, if it wasn't for the fact that such a test would hardly require Airforce One. Only one thing would require that. A Photo of Airforce One over NY.

Same panic could have been achieved with vanilla 747 and an airline cover story.
Exactly. I agree with that line of reasoning completely.
 
Karma Kramer said:
An attack on America will directly be blamed on the Government as them not doing enough to keep us safe. The more deaths the worse it looks for them.

As I noted, evacuation procedures--which is all this ridiculous "secret mission" could feasibly "test" --are neither difficult nor problematic and worked fine even when we didn't have eight years to prepare for the one thing that will never ever happen again.
 
Come on, next thing you know you'll find Air Force One parked at McDonald's. Oh it's just a photo op sorry we didn't tell you all!

Joe Shlabotnik said:
As I noted, evacuation procedures--which is all this ridiculous "secret mission" could feasibly "test" --are neither difficult nor problematic and worked fine even when we didn't have eight years to prepare for the one thing that will never ever happen again.

Really?

Mejilan said:
My building wasn't evacuated (or informed of this) and we took significant losses when the WTC was attacked.

And why in the world would it never happen? Did you forget the guys used fucking box cutters? This shit could happen any day again.
 
Ether_Snake said:
What airline company? How do you get some airline company to make up some story like that? Really. The military would have had to have some airline company part of some plan to have a jet escorted over NY, in secrecy.

You're the ones with the conspiracy theories :lol


Don't you see? You're answering your own question. Why wouldn't it have been easier for the military to escort a vanilla jet as a drill and say, "this was a necessary drill and we needed to see real reaction, sorry for the inconvenience."


"Oh good the govt is taking terrisms srsly!"

Win. Win.

Time to accept it was a dumb photoshoot.
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
Don't you see? You're answering your own question. Why wouldn't it have been easier for the military to escort a vanilla jet as a drill and say, "this was a necessary drill and we needed to see real reaction, sorry for the inconvenience."


"Oh good the govt is taking terrisms srsly!"

Win. Win.

Time to accept it was a dumb photoshoot.

I really don't think the government can perform tests without informing the public. Therefore they have to blame it on something.
 
Also, if there's any danger here, it's on Air Force One, which, even without the President on it, would probably look bad getting blown out of the sky, hence the (regrettable) decision not give the general population a heads up of exactly when and where the plane will be doing a very low flyover.
 
Joe Shlabotnik said:
Also, if there's any danger here, it's on Air Force One, which, even without the President on it, would probably look bad getting blown out of the sky, hence the (regrettable) decision not give the general population a heads up of exactly when and where the plane will be doing a very low flyover.

I really don't think people could tell it was air force one from far away.
 
Joe Shlabotnik said:
...uh, yes, exactly. Because there was no advance announcement that it was Air Force One.

So... I don't follow your point then. If you can't tell if its Air Force One from the ground... then it makes all the more sense to use a famous plane like Air Force One as the test plane... and then blame it on a photo shoot.
 
I'm saying there is some security risk to Air Force One doing a low flyover, which is probably why they elected not to inform the general population what they were doing ahead of time.
 
Like someone shooting it down?:p If that was the case they would have used the damn Photoshop, not go and do it and dispatch fighter jets.
 
Joe Shlabotnik said:
I'm saying there is some security risk to Air Force One doing a low flyover, which is probably why they elected not to inform the general population what they were doing ahead of time.

So you are saying they lied when they said it was a mistake the public wasn't informed?
 
Ether_Snake said:
Like someone shooting it down?:p If that was the case they would have used the damn Photoshop, not go and do it and dispatch fighter jets.

What's with all this Photoshop talk? They want pictures of Air Force One flying by landmarks because they want real pictures of Air Force One flying by landmarks. How tacky do you think the White House is?

And yes, they don't want Air Force One shot down. A rather unlikely scenario, but then they probably didn't want to "test" whether any Stinger missiles had ever been smuggled into NYC.

Karma Kramer said:
So you are saying they lied when they said it was a mistake the public wasn't informed?
The official statement doesn't say it was a mistake not to inform the public. The apology is for the disruption the photo op caused, not for any communication error.

There was no good way to execute this, and they should have just skipped the entire endeavor.
 
Apologies if already posted and I missed it.
FAA Memo: Feds Knew NYC Flyover Would Cause Panic
Federal officials knew that sending two fighter jets and Air Force One to buzz ground zero and Lady Liberty might set off nightmarish fears of a 9/11 replay, but they still ordered the photo-op kept secret from the public.

In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD the Federal Aviation Administration's James Johnston said the agency was aware of "the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes" in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor's office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.

"To say that it should not be made public knowing that it might scare people it's just confounding," Sen. Charles Schumer said. "It's what gives Washington and government a bad name. It's sheer stupidity."

The flyover -- apparently ordered by the White House Office of Military Affairs so it would have souvenir photos of Air Force One with the Statue of Liberty in the background -- had President Obama seeing red. He ordered a probe and apologized.

"It was a mistake. It will never happen again," President Obama said.

The NYPD was so upset about the demand for secrecy that Police Commissioner Ray Kelly vowed never to follow such a directive again and he accused the feds of inciting fears of a 9/11 replay.

"Did it show any insensitivity to the psychic wounds New York City has after 9/11? Absolutely. No questions about it. It was quite insensitive."
 
If ya missed The Daily Show last night, check it for Stewart's reaction to this bizarre mess. Funny yet probably accurately communicates many people's feelings.
 
This was funny and stupid at the same time. A low flying huge ass plane over NYC? Now what does that remind me off....

But I have to admit...I did chuckle at some of the videos with the people running like chickens with their heads cut off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom