Red Scarlet
Member
Hmm, this is a hard statement to reply to. While I have 4x the PS1 (40-something) games than PS2 games (10 or 12), and in more genres, I don't really play all that many more of my PS1 games than PS2 games. So I guess I did enjoy the PS1 era much more going by what I actually purchased (but I actually had money then too compared to the PS2 era, which I didn't become a part of until 2003), although I probably play both systems now around the same amount of time.
As for Square's output in comparison, both generations seemed about the same as the others; lots of games released, only a very low (mainly FF games and a very small handful of other titles) number I actually enjoyed.
I know a lot of people tend to find the PS1 era as possibly Square's "golden age", but I certainly am not in that crowd; a lot of the higher-touted non-FF games released in that period are games I could not enjoy at all. So the PS1 era (or any other single era) seems no different than the others to me.
As for Square's output in comparison, both generations seemed about the same as the others; lots of games released, only a very low (mainly FF games and a very small handful of other titles) number I actually enjoyed.
I know a lot of people tend to find the PS1 era as possibly Square's "golden age", but I certainly am not in that crowd; a lot of the higher-touted non-FF games released in that period are games I could not enjoy at all. So the PS1 era (or any other single era) seems no different than the others to me.