spatenfloot
Member
It will help slightly but nothing huge. Mostly as people see it being used.
The games that sell on Nintendo platforms are Nintendo games. They have a number of big selling games for their core audience. That's it. Where are the third party games? Where are the third party sales? I'll tell you where. They were on PS3 and 360. This is the thing. Third party titles are what dominate the industry. Nintendo consoles these days do not get them. Wii was not a healthy platform for core gamer. Neither is Wii U. Most games people buy are on Playstation or Xbox. The occasional first party game sells on a Ninty console. Everything else sells better on other platforms.
Negligible effect, The Vita is dead in the water. Sold less than 30k last month in the US and that says it all, really. It's the black sheep at Sony; Only sold in the west because they need to keep face with headquarters in Japan.
I expect it to drop, because dropping 400 for a console is going to make you to want to buy games... not another device.
Yet they spend ridiculous amounts on Apple products and Smartphones.
Yes I'm very salty about this.
Memory cards. The price is too damn high!No effect until they lower that Vita price, memory card price, and show advertisements (or demo kiosks) featuring remote play.
I think it'll make the Vita more competitive in the long term.
- Next gen visualsIf no one in the mainstream is buying Wii U then why would they buy PS4 and a Vita.
who is this impostor
Now that the PS4 is officially launched in the North America and the mandatory off-screen push by Sony. What are your predictions for the Nov-Dec sales of the Vita? Will it move 200k units from now through black friday, or even more?
So many people here are naive. Why would you think that PS4 wouldn't impact Vita sales when remote play is fucking awesome? I know if I had the money, I'd definitely buy both so I could do crafting/gathering in FFXIV away from my TV.
lets hope so, but marketing the system as just a ps4 add-on purely because of remote play is a disservice to the system
marketing the Vita is the easiest thing ever, they just need to say:
"hey look, heres this awesome system, on it you can play all those ps1 and psp games that are available on the playstation network, couple that with an awesome playstation plus yearly subscription and you will get free vita games every month and discounts on other games, look at all these indie games, how about all these awesome exclusives like Uncharted:GA, P4G, Gravity Rush, Killzone, Soul Sacrifice and Tearaway, and how about that Ps4 remote play, now you can enjoy your ps4 games while going to school, work or while someones hogging the TV, etc"
if they hammered this into people, on tv or whatever, i dont know how anyone couldnt be excited for the system, but alas, they dont bother marketing this stff and expect people to know this stuff right off the batt
It stands to reason that between PS+ and the PS4 remote play, people who before wouldn't have otherwise bought a Vita; would consider buying one now or in the future.
Looking at some of these reactions, nobody is saying that the PS4 is going to double the Vita sell rate....
you pretty much answered it.The games that sell on Nintendo platforms are Nintendo games. They have a number of big selling games for their core audience. That's it. Where are the third party games? Where are the third party sales? I'll tell you where. They were on PS3 and 360. This is the thing. Third party titles are what dominate the industry. Nintendo consoles these days do not get them. Wii was not a healthy platform for core gamer. Neither is Wii U. Most games people buy are on Playstation or Xbox. The occasional first party game sells on a Ninty console. Everything else sells better on other platforms.
Lets get back to the point at hand. The Wii U gamepad isn't appealing because the software library as a whole is not appealing. The PS4 software library is or at least will be. Why? Because it gets all the third party games. For this reason remote play with Vita is always going to be a bigger deal than the Wii U Gamepad(if it's appealing at all). Wii U didn't take off because it's not a healthy platform when it comes to games. Even if the gamepad was something people cared for, the software library doesn't make it appealing. PS4/Vita remote play won't have that problem.
If remote play doesn't take off then it doesn't take off. Maybe it won't be that appealing even with bundles and good pricing. But the fact that the Wii U didn't take off doesn't automatically make that the case for the Vita. Wii U didn't take off because the software on that platform isn't appealing. If remote play doesn't take off then it truly will be because the feature itself isn't appealing, or at least not enough for people to pay the asking price of a Vita.
So many people here are naive. Why would you think that PS4 wouldn't impact Vita sales when remote play is fucking awesome? I know if I had the money, I'd definitely buy both so I could do crafting/gathering in FFXIV away from my TV.
Well, let's add a wildcard to the conversation. Would the Vita TV do well here if it advertised fully as a way for people to play their PS4 in another room in their home or indeed in another location over the internet? I mean *dat price point afterall.Tons of reason. The biggest being that people who shell out $400 for a new console ain't going to shell another $250. The market for the Vita just isn't there in the west. It's dead. It has a niche market in Japan and is doing slightly better there, but still terrible.
Yet they spend ridiculous amounts on Apple products and Smartphones.
Yes I'm very salty about this.
Insert joke about Vita screen here lol.Well. Those have actual productivity functions. The Vita is a purely gaming device.
Remote play ain't that big of a selling point. People like their big screens.
Well, let's add a wildcard to the conversation. Would the Vita TV do well here if it advertised fully as a way for people to play their PS4 in another room in their home or indeed in another location over the internet? I mean *dat price point afterall.
No reason why they can't redeem it for the Western release. I agree with you that PSTV would be a stellar name.I still don't think the Vita TV will do well. Sony made a mistake by naming it Vita TV and should've rather called it Playstation TV.
If that were true, the Vita would be outselling the 3DS.Well. Those have actual productivity functions. The Vita is a purely gaming device.
Remote play ain't that big of a selling point. People like their big screens.
If that were true, the Vita would be outselling the 3DS.
Sony needs to make people see why owning a Vita makes sense as a PS4 owner.
- Cross-buy
- Cross-play
- Remote play
- Free PS+ games
- Unified eco-system (friends lists/trophies)
I like all the people saying "no increase" or "not much"...complete opposite of what I'm actually seeing.
3 of my friends are all getting Vita's now because of remote play. Another 2 of them plan to get it by Christmas. I personally think that once the word gets out and the general PS4 players start to hear and see this feature with the Vita you will see sales increase.
I want remote play to boost vita sales I really do, I'm just thinking that most people will continue to ignore it sadly.