So would someone with a series X or PC also get those same benefits you speak of? I'm curious if this is some secret sauces or just another case of fanboyism. Because you still think wireless is faster and lower latency, even though solid evidence has been shown to you, several times now.
I posted you the facts, articles mentioning the wifi 6 specs and wifi 6 real world tests. It isn't 'secret sauces', 'fanboyism' or what I think. You are the fanboy attacking me with just your baseless opinions not backed with facts.
In the OP there is an oficial link (has been registered for a country) mentioning that PS5 will have wifi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1. Digital Foundry made the teardown video for Series X where they mentioned it has wifi 5, so won't be benefited of this.
I posted links showing real world wifi 6 tests which show 1.2Gbps to 1.5Gbps data transfer speeds, which is 20-50% faster than the gigabit ethernet theorical peak of 1000BASE-T (standard for wired connection in consoles) and has the same latency than basically the same than the one.
These are facts and you didn't show any data proving it's wrong.
Can you tell me why wired headphones will always sound better than wireless? Why does your phone charge faster via cable, vs wireless charging? Why can you transfer files faster via physical media, vs wirelessly? Why are wired mice more responsive, with lower latency, compared to a wireless one? Why do power lines go directly to your house, instead of wireless energy? Do you see where I'm going with this?
I see where you are going with this, you are mentioning many things totally unrelated to the wifi 6 vs console wired connection because you don't want to accept that the facts say that the wifi 6 is better than the wired connection for consoles and don't have any fact to back your wishes.
Read the facts and accept that this new technology is a new paradigm for the wifi vs wired comparision in consoles.
What in the world? Sending data through radio frequencies will never be faster or more robust than a hardwired copper/fiber cable. Wifi latency is measured in milliseconds. Ethernet is in microseconds, and even nanoseconds in data centers.
I posted the sources many times in the thread, won't post them again. Go and search them. One of them was a real world latency test made by Parsec using a home 802.11ac router testing wifi 2.4GHz vs 5.0GHz vs Gigabit Ethernet. 5.0Ghz 802.11ac wifi gave ~5ms of latency and ethernet gave ~1ms. Other sources posted in the thread mention 802.11ax cuts a 75% of the wifi 802.11ac latency, which would mean ~1,2ms of latency. With old wifi systems the difference between wifi and wired was of even dozens of ms and wifi latency was very unstable, but in newer wifi systems (5.0GHz) it got more stable and reduced vastly the latency, to the point that the difference between wifi 6 and wired is under 1ms, which makes it basically the same, and on top of that wifi 6 offers higher speeds (over 20-50% in real world tests, links also posted in this thread) and other benefits.
Datacenters don't use the 1000BASE-T wired connections that consoles use and don't use these routers, they use faster stuff. On top of that, in their measurings probably are removing some overhead that maybe is counted in this real world home test from packets, ping, etc.