• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Quake-age vs Hurricane-age: Which is more Destructive

Status
Not open for further replies.
so, me and another gaffer (smokey aka Gaf sports biggest douchebag) had a debate. the premise was, which natural disaster has more of a destructive force.
a Hurricane or an earthquake?

i share you our conversation.

[12:00] smokey: yeah what about that earthquake from a week ago
[12:00] smokey: couldve killed u
[12:00] viakado: that was in baja cali chump.
[12:01] viakado: that was like 300 miles away
[12:01] viakado: you non-cali pussies and your fear of earthquakes.
[12:01] viakado: lulz
[12:05] smokey: wait
[12:05] smokey: wait
[12:05] smokey: is this the same fuckers
[12:05] smokey: who were complaining it was fucking RAINING
[12:05] smokey: and you all thought u were gonna die
[12:05] smokey: really?
[12:05] smokey: really
[12:06] viakado: dude, biggest storm in the past 20yrs.
[12:06] viakado: 20 YEARS!
[12:06] smokey: oh nooooooooo water from the sky
[12:06] smokey: that shit was hilarious
[12:07] viakado: It was like mini KATRINA.
[12:07] smokey: LOLOL
[12:07] viakado: no joke, a lot of spots we're flooded.
[12:07] viakado: even a freeway was flooded!
[12:07] smokey: id love to see cali-gaf get hit by a hurricane like we did IKE..real talk..that shit was scary
[12:07] smokey: 12 hours
[12:07] smokey: of nothing but 90+ winds and raini
[12:09] smokey: Ike was a strong cat 2 so from now on
[12:09] smokey: anything higher than a cat 2 im bailin tha fuck out
[12:09] smokey: no way am i staying
[12:10] viakado: floridians would scoff at you texans.
[12:10] viakado: lol
[12:10] smokey: w/e man hurricanes r the real deal
[12:10] smokey: of course
[12:10] smokey8: u panic when it rainis
[12:10] smokey: rains
[12:10] smokey: so
[12:10] smokey: from a basic thunderstorm
[12:11] viakado: earthquakes>>>some pansy ass hurricane.

so gaf, what say you? which natural disaster is worse.
hurricane or earthquake.

Hurricanes exhibits a & B.
hurricane katrina (a):
2rdwwe8.jpg

hurricane Ike (b):
nd0kmq.jpg


after effects of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake:
tsu2004IndoBandaAcehSAT2J05.jpg


image above pretty much solidfies my case.
 
I was going to say quake, but you can build for quake tolerance (i.e. Chile), but you can't really build for hurricane tolerance. If some monster flood is coming, you're fucked. Quakes do have the side effect of also possibly generating monster tsunamis that can devastate countries clear across on the other side of the ocean....

In terms of sheer force and energy released? Probably a quake. In the context of human civilization? Probably hurricanes.
 
Leunam said:
Which one caused more damage in SimCity?

DCX
if i remember, an earthquake caused more damage.
maxis knows what's up.

CharlieDigital said:
I was going to say quake, but you can build for quake tolerance (i.e. Chile), but you can't really build for hurricane tolerance.
hmm..interesting argument.
 
Please.

Cali-Gaf were on here thinking the world was going to end because it was fucking dropping water from the sky in LA. Hurricanes are more destructive. Earthquakes are only destructive if you're around alot of buildings etc. A fucking hurricane could pick your ass up and throw you down the street, plus flooding, rain etc.

You lose kado.
 
I don't know which does more damage, but I'd much rather live in an earthquake zone than a hurricane zone. With hurricanes you have to do shit like board up windows and then evacuate. With earthquakes you don't have to do nothin'. If it happens, it happens.
 
I'd lean toward an earthquake being more destructive as it effects the structural integrity of buildings, subways, etc, etc. I would think a hurricane would do more surface/superficial damage than anything.
 
The Chilean earthquake was magnitude 8.8, which is pretty high up there on the Richter scale but to date only has 486 confirmed deaths. According to wiki, about 1800 people died from Katrina.

Quakes probably dissipate more energy, but like I said, humans can engineer around the dangers of quakes. You can't really engineer around a giant wall of water and wind that reaches several thousands of feet into the atmosphere.

If the question is "which has more energy", then I think quakes win. They can shift enough mass to change Earth's axis :lol If the question is which is more destructive to human civilization and human lives, I think it has to be hurricanes.
 
Tsunami's don't count. I'm talking about the quake itself. There's plenty of time for a tsunami warning in this day and age.

I'm talking strictly about the quake itself.
 
Green Scar said:
MegaQuake vs SuperHurricane: coming to SyFy this fall

The Megapiranha thread made me think of this immediately. I'm going with the earthquake in this matchup. How catastrophic would a 10.0 quake be? Jebus help the gulf states if they're ever hit with a strong quake and a hurricane at the same time
 
sthelenaex.jpg


Supervolcano.

Yellowstone is our extinction point unless something extraterrestrial comes along (asteroids/meteors) or we're actually dumb enough to kill ourselves first.

Sleep well kids.
 
if the building codes in this fucking country were up to standard hurricanes would be laughed at. i mean apart from the flooding hurricanes are weaksauce.
 
BreakyBoy said:
http://www.unmuseum.org/sthelenaex.jpg[/im

Supervolcano.

Yellowstone is our extinction point unless something extraterrestrial comes along (asteroids/meteors) or we're actually dumb enough to kill ourselves first.

Sleep well kids.[/QUOTE]

We'll be on Mars by the time Yellowstone erupts. And if not then we'll just go underground and become the Locust.
 
unconcerned said:
if the building codes in this fucking country were up to standard hurricanes would be laughed at. i mean apart from the flooding hurricanes are weaksauce.

You'd still have the effects of flood damage that ruins houses, cars, electronics, etc. There's no such thing as a water-tight house. Hurricanes can also dramatically disrupt the food supply by wiping out crops and destroying farmland.
 
BreakyBoy said:
sthelenaex.jpg


Supervolcano.

Yellowstone is our extinction point unless something extraterrestrial comes along (asteroids/meteors) or we're actually dumb enough to kill ourselves first.

Sleep well kids.
in this argument then, meteor>>>supervolcano.
Smokey said:
Tsunami's don't count. I'm talking about the quake itself. There's plenty of time for a tsunami warning in this day and age.

I'm talking strictly about the quake itself.
fine whatever. im still winning.
 
unconcerned said:
if the building codes in this fucking country were up to standard hurricanes would be laughed at. i mean apart from the flooding hurricanes are weaksauce.
use a fucking comma.
 
Smokey said:
Tsunami's don't count. I'm talking about the quake itself. There's plenty of time for a tsunami warning in this day and age.

I'm talking strictly about the quake itself.

but tsunamis are a direct cause of certain earthquakes. Why would flooding caused by a hurricane count, but not huge ass waves caused by earthquakes?
 
viakado said:
fine whatever. im still winning.

Not really. Check the posts above you.

You lose.

Manmademan said:
but tsunamis are a direct cause of certain earthquakes. Why would flooding caused by a hurricane count, but not huge ass waves caused by earthquakes?

Because it happens after the fact. Sometimes hours. Nowadays there is ample warning for tsunami's. Hurricane that shit hits you all at once. Like I said in the OP it was 10-12 hours of hard wind and rain and it didn't stop once during that entire span.
 
the_log_ride said:
The Megapiranha thread made me think of this immediately. I'm going with the earthquake in this matchup. How catastrophic would a 10.0 quake be? Jebus help the gulf states if they're ever hit with a strong quake and a hurricane at the same time
Not that I'd wish this one anyone, but it would be interesting to see the damage a hurricane and earthquake (simultaneously) would do to a town / city. It would be the ultimate natural beatdown.

Edit:

viakado said:
in this argument then, meteor>>>supervolcano.
Yeah but a supervolcano eruption is more likely, right? Even if there was a meteor on a course for Earth I'm pretty sure technology would detect that son'bitch and we could nuke it like in that film. Can't really do anything about a volcano.
 
CharlieDigital said:
If the question is "which has more energy", then I think quakes win. They can shift enough mass to change Earth's axis :lol If the question is which is more destructive to human civilization and human lives, I think it has to be hurricanes.

Which is probably where the arguement gets pretty gray. Not to mention we need to decide whether we're going to consider geography, cityscape and population density. Obviously hurricane Katrina woudln't have done as much damage if it hit somewhere less developed and populated.

Then there's the matter of Quake-generated Tsunamis. If they count then We're talking about 230,000 people dead from the 2004 Tsunami, which dwarfs any hurricane death toll I've heard of.
 
viakado said:
Hurricanes dont kill people. The flying debris, and water from gale force wind does.

Or maybe a hurricane ripping off the roof of your house and sending the roof AND YOU 200 yards.

What were you saying again?

Then again you and the rest of Cali-GAF were in full blown meltdown mode when a thunderstorm hit LA so I don't expect you to get it.
 
I think the only option for settling this argument is for viakado to experience a Hurricane and for Smokey to experience an Earthquake. Whoever survives is the loser.
 
Saying you can't count the Tsunamis that result from earthquakes is stupid. Then you can't count the flooding and levy breaks in hurricanes. Which means Katrina wouldn't have been such a big deal.

Eartquakes, aftershocks, and Tsunamis can be incredibly devastating.

hmm..interesting argument.
I hope you mean "incorrect." You can build for hurricane resistance and flooding.
 
LOL, come to the midwest fellas. Come see a tornado sometime. They don't happen in populated areas even nearly as much as an earthquake or hurricane, but if you get caught inside one your pretty much dead.
 
daw840 said:
LOL, come to the midwest fellas. Come see a tornado sometime. They don't happen in populated areas even nearly as much as an earthquake or hurricane, but if you get caught inside one your pretty much dead.


Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes.

Visualize that for a second.
 
daw840 said:
LOL, come to the midwest fellas. Come see a tornado sometime. They don't happen in populated areas even nearly as much as an earthquake or hurricane, but if you get caught inside one your pretty much dead.
have you not seen the ending of twister?
 
viakado said:
have you not seen the ending of twister?

OMG...:lol

Welp, that seals it. Just make sure you have a belt or harness of some sort and tie yourself down real good. Then it's just a walk in the park. You win Vikamadenko, you win.
 
Mechanical Snowman said:
Yeah but a supervolcano eruption is more likely, right? Even if there was a meteor on a course for Earth I'm pretty sure technology would detect that son'bitch and we could nuke it like in that film. Can't really do anything about a volcano.

I dunno about more likely, and I'm not entirely sure about us being able to detect it. We only scan I think less than 10% of the sky? We've already had numerous reports of near-misses with catastrophic-sized asteroids that we only figured out were near misses AFTER they passed by us.

As for supervolcanoes, people think it's like that picture. That's Mt. St. Helens in... I believe 1980? I'd wiki it, but I'm lazy. I don't believe that qualifies as a supervolcano in the slightest. Yellowstone, as (again, I believe) the world's only known active supervolcano, would be at minimum 10,000 times stronger.

Let's see if I remember my lessons correctly.

For those of you who are familiar with Yellowstone National Park, know that the grand majority of the park lies within the caldera created by the last time it exploded. The caldera of a volcano is that crater-shaped hole you're used to seeing in the center of a volcano. This one is just so large and wide that we couldn't really tell it was a caldera for a long time. Funny that.

The ashfall from Mt. St. Helens reached from it's origin in Washington state to as far southeast as the border of Wyoming. Yellowstone would cover more than half of the U.S. It's too bad that the resultant release of gases and ash would effectively send us into an ice age for quite some time. Oh, but don't worry, it's very likely the ash in the atmosphere will also make the air unbreathable to us, so we'll suffocate painfully before we can worry about the cold.

Oh, and did I mention that all research points to the fact that the Yellowstone supervolcano erupts pretty much like clockwork every 600,000 years?

It's been 640,000 now since the last one. We're kind of overdue.

As I said, sleep tight kids. :)
 
Tornadoes are the most terrifying thing to see in real life and you'll never forget that sound as long as you live.

tornado.jpg
 
Konka said:
Tornadoes are the most terrifying thing to see in real life and you'll never forget that sound as long as you live.

[snipped awesome tornado pic]

Yes, all theoretical disaster scenarios aside, I've been in both an earthquake (smallish one, I think 4 or 5 on the richter scale), and several hurricanes (South Florida resident. Went through Andrew back in 1992 for one). Neither of them terrified me as much as seeing a tornado within eye shot. Worse still is seeing one and realizing there really is pretty much no such thing as "underground" in South Florida. It's all water underneath, so if a tornado hits, you better get your ass out of the way. :lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom