• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Question: Should Homosexuality Be Encouraged?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agreed. Uncompromisable, it sounds like you have issues unrelated to homosexuality that you need to sort though first.

Why does he have "issues"? In general I think its perfectly reasonable to think what's cool for other people's kids isn't what I want for my own. Some people want their sons to be athletes but end up with book worms or vice versa. What's wrong with having a preference?
 
Tell me more, I'm open to opinions.

You seem to have some sort of complex associated with immortality, and you're using your hypothetical children to further that goal. That's pretty much the worst reason to have kids.

Why does he have "issues"? In general I think its perfectly reasonable to think what's cool for other people's kids isn't what I want for my own. Some people want their sons to be athletes but end up with book worms or vice versa.

Those people also have issues.
 
From an anthropological standpoint, that's why we all reproduce.

I still think he's an ass if he's going to try and prevent his children from possibly becoming the people they want to become. The idea that having children to extend ones genetic makeup into the world isn't some whacko cultic belief though.

I agree though. If my child doesn't want kids no matter what, i can't force him if he made his decision. I just want to encourage him to make the decision I would prefer he or she made as much as I can. That's all.
 
I see your point, but I also believe that I best serve my genes by helping them out in life (hence having a supporting family). That's why I feel more sensitive to 'accidents' since I'm not diversifying my offspring.

Come up with any excuse that you deem appropriate for your irrational viewpoint, it doesn't change the fact that you are a bigot and a potentially terrible father.
 
Why does he have "issues"? In general I think its perfectly reasonable to think what's cool for other people's kids isn't what I want for my own. Some people want their sons to be athletes but end up with book worms or vice versa.

It's the same type of situation (though on a vastly differently level), and it's still disappointing. When your child is born, you should want them to accomplish their dreams, not your own dreams for them.

I agree though. If my child doesn't want kids no matter what, i can't force him if he made his decision. I just want to encourage him to make the decision I would prefer he or she made as much as I can. That's all.

The thing is, none of these are "decisions". You might want something that they can't give you. And you're going to have to deal with it and love them as much as you can. If not, you're going to be a shitty parent.
 
Why does he have "issues"? In general I think its perfectly reasonable to think what's cool for other people's kids isn't what I want for my own. Some people want their sons to be athletes but end up with book worms or vice versa.
I don't think we're even talking about the same thing. thetrin said what I was going to do in his post above.
 
From an anthropological standpoint, that's why we all reproduce.

I still think he's an ass if he's going to try and prevent his children from possibly becoming the people they want to become. The idea that having children to extend ones genetic makeup into the world isn't some whacko cultic belief though.

We're not living in the Stone Age where the species is in danger of dying out if everyone doesn't reproduce as much as possible. I think that modern society has advanced enough that we have the luxury of having a family and raising kids for emotional reasons rather than biological necessity. The idea that one would have kids solely because you want them to do something for you later on comes across as very selfish in this day and age.

If there's ever a near-extinction event that reduces the human race to a few thousand people I'll rethink my position.
 
Stuff like this just gets on my nerves to no end. I can't wait untill society reaches the point where sexuality is just a matter of fact, like being bald or being small.

Really, we should just be way past this as human beings by now. Lets stop ignoring simple biologic facts, such as homosexuality, because it conflicts with what you've been told by people in the past. Homesexuality is a fact, not an opinion or a choice.

This shouldn't for a second be a debate and I for one, can't wait till we're past to it being one. Let gay people be who they are, and really: if you, personally, feel it will put them in "hell" then so be it, since you're going to "heaven" anyway, why would you even be bothered?

Live and let live.
 
This whole 'genes' argument just strikes me as a Christian bigot who thinks he's too smart for his own good thinking:

"Ah ha! I'll show those stupid gay loving heathens by using their science against them! MWA HA HA!"
 
I agree though. If my child doesn't want kids no matter what, i can't force him if he made his decision. I just want to encourage him to make the decision I would prefer he or she made as much as I can. That's all.

I still haven't seen you explain why a gay child of yours couldn't reproduce via a surrogate and then raise the child with their partner.
 
How can you encouraged something that isn't even a choice to begin with? Do we need to encourage girls to be girls and boys to be boys?
 
How can you encouraged something that isn't even a choice to begin with? Do we need to encourage girls to be girls and boys to be boys?

Except we DO do that, via media, toys, and cultural suggestion. Look around you, man. What toys are marketed to girls? What toys are marketed to boys? What colors are associated with each gender? How do television shows paint male and female characters?

Stuff like this makes me wonder if i should feel bad for liking cooking barefoot in the kitchen.

Wait, how are you supposed to cook? I don't wear shoes in my own house.
 
We're not living in the Stone Age where the species is in danger of dying out if everyone doesn't reproduce as much as possible. I think that modern society has advanced enough that we have the luxury of having a family and raising kids for emotional reasons rather than biological necessity. The idea that one would have kids solely because you want them to do something for you later on comes across as very selfish in this day and age.

If there's ever a near-extinction event that reduces the human race to a few thousand people I'll rethink my position.

You guys picture me as some sort of patriarchal brute, but in all honesty I want my children to have a happy life and I think having kids is part of that. I also put a DNA spin on it, that's all.
 
No it should not be encouraged but if a child should turn out homo then he/she should not be harassed maybe they should move them to schools with other homos.
 
You guys picture me as some sort of patriarchal brute, but in all honesty I want my children to have a happy life and I think having kids is part of that. I also put a DNA spin on it, that's all.

And if your kids don't think that having children of their own will necessarily make them happy?
 
Would you be okay with kindergardens and preschools teaching children that a boy can love and be with a girl or another boy and it's their choice (vice-versa for girls) ?

Absolutely.

It's not even a question.
 
You guys picture me as some sort of patriarchal brute, but in all honesty I want my children to have a happy life and I think having kids is part of that. I also put a DNA spin on it, that's all.

That's your issue right there. You're already pushing your desires upon your kids and they don't even exist yet.
 
I still haven't seen you explain why a gay child of yours couldn't reproduce via a surrogate and then raise the child with their partner.

The gay child would be a tainted one who he wouldn't want to pollute his family line with such weakened DNA.
 
I think you place too much emphasis on passing on your genetic lineage through heteronormativity.

As you can see, a lot of people are really sensitive and offended at your particular wording however, this is a super touchy subject and you should really approach it with a bit more tact and caution in the future if you want to really have a discussion about it.

That being said, I am not very emotionally attached to the subject so, I'm not going to jump down your throat. I will say however that you need to consider a lot of things here.

Whether or not your children pass on your genetic lineage is really a crap shoot, regardless of whether or not they are gay or straight. Take a second and step back and really consider it - are you going to follow your child around their entire life ensuring that they become the sort of person that will eventually breed and have your grand children? What if they are sterile, have an accident, or are straight and don't want kids? There are dozens of other factors with varying degrees of likeliness that are going to effect your chances here - you will drive yourself crazy trying to think of all those things, and at the same time you end up treating your children like livestock.

I think the reason you place an unnecessarily high amount of emphasis on the homosexuality angle is because, whether or not you realize it, some part of you has been effected by the dialogue some... unsavoury people in society are putting forth in regards to homosexuality. I don't think you are a bigot or anything, but I do think that a part of you is being led by the nose to an issue that really wouldn't even be a consideration for you if the anti-homosexual dialogue wasn't so prevalent.

Really really give it some thought man.
 
You guys picture me as some sort of patriarchal brute, but in all honesty I want my children to have a happy life and I think having kids is part of that. I also put a DNA spin on it, that's all.

And yet you refuse to explain why a gay (male) child could not reproduce by hiring a surrogate (or having a friend serve in that role) impregnated via IVF so he and his partner could raise your grandchild. Of course if you have a daughter the process will be MUCH easier and cheaper too!
 
No it should not be encouraged but if a child should turn out homo then he/she should not be harassed maybe they should move them to schools with other homos.

I don't even...
 
I still haven't seen you explain why a gay child of yours couldn't reproduce via a surrogate and then raise the child with their partner.

Fine, you win. I could try to take that route if it happened.

I guess if I'm really serious, than it doesn't matter if s/he prefers their sex, they can have kids.

I guess I associate male homosexuality with some popular image of the homosexual lifestyle and the fact that most don't have kids.
 
And yet you refuse to explain why a gay (male) child could not reproduce by hiring a surrogate (or having a friend serve in that role) impregnated via IVF so he and his partner could raise your grandchild. Of course if you have a daughter the process will be MUCH easier and cheaper too!

Because... IVF isn't God's plan!!

I mean... because genes and stuff... ya, genes.
 
Fine, you win. I could try to take that route if it happened.

I guess if I'm really serious, than it doesn't matter if s/he prefers their sex, they can have kids.

I guess I associate male homosexuality with some popular image of the homosexual lifestyle and the fact that most don't have kids.

What is this "homosexual lifestyle"?
 
Fine, you win. I could try to take that route if it happened.

I guess if I'm really serious, than it doesn't matter if s/he prefers their sex, they can have kids.

I guess I associate male homosexuality with some popular image of the homosexual lifestyle and the fact that most don't have kids.

Another scary buzzword. I love you.
 
Fine, you win. I could try to take that route if it happened.

I guess if I'm really serious, than it doesn't matter if s/he prefers their sex, they can have kids.

I guess I associate male homosexuality with some popular image of the homosexual lifestyle and the fact that most don't have kids.

You could say the same for the nerd stereotype. Would you be horrified if you found out your kid loved Dungeons and Dragons? That thought process is just as ill-informed and idiotic.

I will be disappointed, that's all.

You will be disappointed that your kids found their own definition of happiness through individual thought, rather than just copying what dad thinks? Boy, you're going to be a great father.
 
Typical to get hysterical over someone who represents the common folks view. What is controversial with moving kids to schools where the others are like them? Voulountarily of course.
 
Fine, you win. I could try to take that route if it happened.

I guess if I'm really serious, than it doesn't matter if s/he prefers their sex, they can have kids.

I guess I associate male homosexuality with some popular image of the homosexual lifestyle and the fact that most don't have kids.

Boom. GAF therapy session works every time.

1) There is no "homosexual lifestyle".

2) Gays have kids. They have their own kids. They adopt kids. You could still have grandkids.
 
Typical to get hysterical over someone who represents the common folks view. What is controversial with moving kids to schools where the others are like them? Voulountarily of course.
What's controversial about keeping gay kids together because they can't interact with other people?
 
We're not living in the Stone Age where the species is in danger of dying out if everyone doesn't reproduce as much as possible. I think that modern society has advanced enough that we have the luxury of having a family and raising kids for emotional reasons rather than biological necessity. The idea that one would have kids solely because you want them to do something for you later on comes across as very selfish in this day and age.

If there's ever a near-extinction event that reduces the human race to a few thousand people I'll rethink my position.

From an Anthropological standpoint ... we aren't that far detached from the stone age though. We're talking millions of years of eveolution. An Anthropologist would believe that things as basic as jealously developed over years of evolution so that people can help garauntee the passing of their genes.

I'm not trying to get into a nature vs nuture debate, but I don't think that someone placing importance on the passing on of their genes is odd. It's not. It's pretty basic.

That being said ... I wouldn't care enough about passing my genes on that I need to "stack the deck" in my favor. My kids will become who they want to be, regardless of my desire to pass my genes on, and I will support them the whole way.
 
Typical to get hysterical over someone who represents the common folks view. What is controversial with moving kids to schools where the others are like them? Voulountarily of course.

Well there is gays kids in every school... do you just want to put them all in one?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom