• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Question: Should Homosexuality Be Encouraged?

Status
Not open for further replies.
They're your kids for gods sake, how could you treat them any differently? If my son grows up to be king of the gay people (I realize there is no king, but the lower east side of Manhattan is known to do weird things) then I'd be proud as fuck.
Im responding to a post where someone assumes a parent would do exactly that and Im saying its not fair to assume by clearly stating I personally wouldnt. Fuck this Im out.
 
Parent's rarely do this. So yeah, schools should teach kids about equality and that's it's ok to be yourself.
 
People should be encouraged to be themselves, yes.

RVyP9.gif


First post still doing it right.
 
Maybe i haven't experienced enough of the south, but i've never felt intolerance for being who i am. Female. Bi. Not Christian. Weird.
People think they can understand a regional culture by snapshots from news media. So of course, when the topics of "LGBT" and "The South" cross, it's going to be with an image of people protesting gay marriage.

My experiences with the South and say, New York are very similar: in rural areas there are a lot of rednecks (yes, in both places) with prejudiced views, and in major cities there are centers of learning where there is much more tolerance and enlightenment.
 
So, I will interpret the non-answers as "no."

Not sure why you are so worried about a possible outcome (that is not harmful) when you have a much bigger problem with your reproduction fantasies.
 
"Encouraged" implies that homosexuality is a choice, and/or sexuality can be changed by what someone is taught.

So I think the entire idea of whether or not to encourage homosexuality betrays a misunderstanding of what homosexuality is.

Of course you could think that homosexuality isn't a choice and can't be changed, and still be debating whether or not to condone it through teaching, but that's an argument that doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Yeah, its not so much North vs. South as much as it is rural vs. more industrialized. In rural areas there is less of a diversity of people and education while in more industrialized areas there is more of a variety of people that you meet face to face instead of just hearing slander about and more opportunities for education. Of course, the North is generally more industrialized and the South more rural.

Kids should be taught to love whoever they want, regardless of gender.
 
I know, I was agreeing with you.
Well shit, my bad then amigo. I completely misread the tone of your post, the "theyre your kids for God's sake" part made me think you were being condescending. No hard feelings. :)
 
"Encouraged" implies that homosexuality is a choice, and/or sexuality can be changed by what someone is taught.

So I think the entire idea of whether or not to encourage homosexuality betrays a misunderstanding of what homosexuality is.

Of course you could think that homosexuality isn't a choice and can't be changed, and still be debating whether or not to condone it through teaching, but that's an argument that doesn't make any sense to me.

This is what I came into post. Even if its encouraged it wouldn't make any difference as kids who aren't gay aren't going to suddenly start acting that way.
 
This is a bit of a rant FYI

I think it shouldn't be discussed.

In fact all sexuality shouldn't be discussed.

People should be prosecuted for promoting any form of sexuality. We should live in a society where sexuality is something intimately personal that should have no say on your work, your identity and your life. It shouldn't be a 'thing'.

Unfortunately everybody and their mother doesn't believe in this. Homosexuals no matter how gay and proud, will always differentiate themselves from heterosexuals and so where there is difference there is always hatred.

You want to see a society that completely accepts homosexuality amongst other nasty shit?

Now hear me out.

images

Afghanis ...

Oh wait what? Yeah I know right. They openly execute 'homosexuals'? What am I talking about?

Seriously read this

For centuries, Afghan men have taken boys, roughly 9 to 15 years old, as lovers. Some research suggests that half the Pashtun tribal members in Kandahar and other southern towns are bacha baz, the term for an older man with a boy lover. Literally it means "boy player." The men like to boast about it.

"Having a boy has become a custom for us," Enayatullah, a 42-year-old in Baghlan province, told a Reuters reporter. "Whoever wants to show off should have a boy."

They're all raging homosexual pedophiles! Yet wait ... this is a country known for its total utter hatred for homosexuals! What is going on here?

Now before I continue Afghanistan society is very much fucked, the last thing I'm saying is that we should be more like them. I'm using it as a real world example of what happens when you 'differentiate' yourself. But what their society has over ours is a total lack of any sexual identity. There was no homosexuality. Hence there was no hatred for them.

Before we arrived, before western culture, before all these 'homosexual rights' etc etc arrived. Homosexuality was rampant ... but accepted. Because they didn't see it as anything different. It was just normal. But since technology, since we've arrived and shown our culture. We've separated out a normal behavior and made it different. We've created this identity to hate.

Now look at our society. It sounds harsh, but homophobia is a relatively new development ... that very interestingly correlates with 'gay pride'. The very act of 'coming out' and 'differentiating themselves from us' has created this difference, this gulf between two completely equal people.

The perfect society does not have the term 'homosexual' or 'heterosexual'. It does not have 'gay pride' it does not have 'gay mannerisms' (mainly a stereotype i know) or gay nightclubs etc etc.

The perfect society equates homosexuality and heterosexuality to liking red or blue, to preferring cider over beer, to liking reality TV over soap operas, to cycling or walking, to sleeping on your back or on your side. It is an insignificant detail of your life, neither explainable or justifiable.

Sexual orientation is not a lifestyle, identity or way of life. Homosexuals are not different from Heterosexuals. They are all the same.

This.
gay-pride.jpg

Creates an entity to hate and fear. They dress different. They sound different. They act different. People are primates they fear what is different. They hate what they fear.

This.
large-crowd1937.jpg

Is a workable society. Everyone is equal. No one group stands out.


So in answer to the question, should we encourage homosexuality? No. We should shut it out we should shut out all sexuality. We should blanket it from our media. We should raise our children in a society that does not depict and differentiate sexuality.
 
wat

EDIT: So I'm making an actual contribution...


Sexual orientation is not a lifestyle, identity or way of life. Homosexuals are not different from Heterosexuals. They are all the same.

...

Is a workable society. Everyone is equal. No one group stands out.

You're scaring me, dude. We don't need everyone to be the same in order to have equality. The point is not to repress people's differences, but rather not to treat people differently because of them.

PS Happy birthday Gaborn, I hope this thread keeps on giving for you!
 
Well shit, my bad then amigo. I completely misread the tone of your post, the "theyre your kids for God's sake" part made me think you were being condescending. No hard feelings. :)

No hard feelings, I often come off that way but am generally an okay dude.
 
You're scaring me, dude. We don't need everyone to be the same in order to have equality. The point is not to repress people's differences, but rather not to treat people differently because of them.
Agreed. I don't see how practical your ideas are anyway iamvampire, as by your own admission these only exist in a "perfect society" away from any media. I think being open and allowing people to explore and understand their differences is better than hiding those differences away.
 
I don't want children. I think that we should stop defining success and happiness through primarily heteronormative standards.
 
People think they can understand a regional culture by snapshots from news media. So of course, when the topics of "LGBT" and "The South" cross, it's going to be with an image of people protesting gay marriage.

My experiences with the South and say, New York are very similar: in rural areas there are a lot of rednecks (yes, in both places) with prejudiced views, and in major cities there are centers of learning where there is much more tolerance and enlightenment.

This is fairly accurate to what i've experienced as well.
 
That's hardly sexual education in the common understanding of it.

The subject of sexual behavior need not be addressed.

I think he's reading too much into it. It's hard to think of stuff like this without thinking about the sexual part. Children on the other hand have no idea about that and just want to know why that man is kissing that man, or that woman kissing that woman. Or why Kevin S. has two dads.
 
I forgot who I heard say this, but if homosexuality was a choice, then who in the fucking hell would choose it today, or in the past either? You get completely shit on by a bunch of people for it, are always going to be attacked for it, always going to have to deal with douchebags out there, not to mention all the crazies that will say you're going to burn in hell or something.

I mean, I'm not gay, so I really have no clue to the extent of how much these people just get absolutely railed against every day. It must suck to come home, and hope that you don't flip through a channel where somebody is just saying you should die or be punished because you like to fuck people of the same sex. Who the fuck would just choose that? Choose to deal with all of that?
 
You may possibly have had an ok position without the bolded, but WHY the bolded? Can you explain?
Well I guess what I meant is that teaching preschoolers about sex is useless because at their age they wouldn't be able to comprehend the education, and then explaining the different types of sexual orientations would make it even more confusing.
 
I forgot who I heard say this, but if homosexuality was a choice, then who in the fucking hell would choose it today, or in the past either?

There's plenty of hot dudes and chicks, obviously.

You want to see a society that completely accepts homosexuality amongst other nasty shit?
loljunior


First time doing that!

Well I guess what I meant is that teaching preschoolers about sex is useless because at their age they wouldn't be able to comprehend the education, and then explaining the different types of sexual orientations would make it even more confusing.
It's as simple as "Some people like boys, some people like girls, theres nothing wrong with either."
 
Well I guess what I meant is that teaching preschoolers about sex is useless because at their age they wouldn't be able to comprehend the education, and then explaining the different types of sexual orientations would make it even more confusing.

Suppose that one pre-schooler has two mommies and wants to bring them both to mothers day. What do you tell him or her? Should you explain to the kids? What would you tell them?

edit: ah, good. That's all anyone is saying.
 
[
This.
gay-pride.jpg

Creates an entity to hate and fear. They dress different. They sound different. They act different. People are primates they fear what is different. They hate what they fear.

.

Historically you are incorrect. People don't hate the gays because they differentiate themselves. The gay community has had to differentiate itself in response to the hatred it receives as a means of organizing and protesting such discrimination.

Also, I'd like to hear why homosexuality is "nasty shit".
 
Well I guess what I meant is that teaching preschoolers about sex is useless because at their age they wouldn't be able to comprehend the education, and then explaining the different types of sexual orientations would make it even more confusing.

so when bobby comes home crying after school to his two mothers after Joey Junior learns to say shit like "bobby's parents are going to burn in a fire for being gay" from his homophobic father we should assume that there's no consequences because Joey doesn't understand what he's talking about? Or perhaps we could remedy it buy simply telling children that there are many different kind of families in the world?

some kids have a mommy and daddy, some kids have two mommies, some have two daddies and sometimes kids only have 1 parent. blah blah blah.
 
I forgot who I heard say this, but if homosexuality was a choice, then who in the fucking hell would choose it today, or in the past either? You get completely shit on by a bunch of people for it, are always going to be attacked for it, always going to have to deal with douchebags out there, not to mention all the crazies that will say you're going to burn in hell or something.

I mean, I'm not gay, so I really have no clue to the extent of how much these people just get absolutely railed against every day. It must suck to come home, and hope that you don't flip through a channel where somebody is just saying you should die or be punished because you like to fuck people of the same sex. Who the fuck would just choose that? Choose to deal with all of that?

People who have been deceived by satan of course!
 
You're a chode for even taking this article seriously, OP.

Question: should Christianity be encouraged? Moral decay has already set in.
I feel like the OP should be edited so that the guy doesn't get anymore flack after the seven pages spent arguing with him and (hopefully) changing his mind. This thread is now bait for other crazy people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom