DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Why? Because your shitty ass Colonial Marines bait and switch, that's why, chump.
Last edited:
Problem with this line of thinking is companies don't give a fuck about customers, profit is their sole concern even if it means fucking the customer in the ass.Imagine going to the grocery store and having to rely upon user reviews to figure out if the milk or bread sucks or not? If I ran a store, I would curate *everything* and I would develop a relationship with my customer such that they trusted if it was in the store, it was worthy.
Why? Because your shitty ass Colonial Marines bait and switch, that's why, chump.
user reviews are indeed bullshit. Go read reviews for any newegg product and you'll see 1's and 2's because the dummy didn't know how to install something correctly. Who has ever actually read a steam user review?
No one makes purchasing decisions off of steam reviews anyway, so why do people care so much?
user reviews are indeed bullshit. Go read reviews for any newegg product and you'll see 1's and 2's because the dummy didn't know how to install something correctly. Who has ever actually read a steam user review?
No one makes purchasing decisions off of steam reviews anyway, so why do people care so much?
User reviews, especially for hardware, are hugely important. I've never had a problem with any of my hardware because i read the user reviews.
Lets see...
Buy the Motherboard with a 4/5 score and the vast majority of everyone loving it. A few isolated problems.
OR
Buy the Motherboard with a 2/5 score and the vast majority of everyone having some kind of issue, if not the same one.
If you can't quickly sift through user reviews and learn something that's a you problem.
I have. If i read that a game is broken because of a recent patch or its a shitty port, why would i purchase it?
User reviews, especially for hardware, are hugely important. I've never had a problem with any of my hardware because i read the user reviews.
Lets see...
Buy the Motherboard with a 4/5 score and the vast majority of everyone loving it. A few isolated problems.
OR
Buy the Motherboard with a 2/5 score and the vast majority of everyone having some kind of issue, if not the same one.
If you can't quickly sift through user reviews and learn something that's a you problem.
Right, and the product that has a low review count gets fucked because a few people gave it a 1 because shipping was a day late. Makes total sense.
I read them all the time. There are plenty of detailed positive and negative reviews that will tell you everything you need to know.user reviews are indeed bullshit. Go read reviews for any newegg product and you'll see 1's and 2's because the dummy didn't know how to install something correctly. Who has ever actually read a steam user review?
Not even that, but using Sega's Aliens money to fund Borderlands 2 and Pitchford farming ALIENS off to 3 or 4 no mark tiny dev studios. Awful person, awful studio.The guy that brought you this:
Is letting you know about the high standards his imaginary store would have.
Sure, Randy.
Yes but this is (presumably) just out of spite because of BL3 being on EpicDidn't B1 get a free PC update?
So because a few people suck we get rid of a valuable service? Just because something has a 3/5 score doesn't mean its not a 5/5 product. That's why you READ the reviews. My motherboard for example had a number of low scores because the M.2 Slot is hit or miss with what it accepts. But the board itself is rock solid. How do i know that? Because i READ the reviews.
Like this. I go out to buy milk because I need milk. It's not entertainment. It's not a luxury item. You also don't go and buy a different brand of milk and bread every time you go into the store.Imagine going to the grocery store and having to rely upon user reviews to figure out if the milk or bread sucks or not?
Oh please, if we get rid of user reviews we’ll just be silencing gamers even further. It can be argued that review bombing is already a side effect from taking away gamer’s voices. Besides, this is Randy Pitchford we’re talking about here. I wouldn’t be surprised if the “executives” that made the decision to make it a Epic Store exclusive were actually just him and he’s taking this as an opportunity to back up his idea.
Randy Pitchford loves to talk mad shit about Valve any chance he gets (due to some perceived personal slight he feels from the days of developing Half Life 1 expansions) but he loves money even more so that is why he doesn't have the stones to take his bat and ball and USB drive full of barely legal squirt porn and go home and actually remove Gearbox software from Steam.
Anyone offer any proof?Didn’t Randy claim to have come up with the name ‘Valve’ while playing poker with Gaben? And then Gaben came out saying it was all bullshit? That was fun.
Didn’t Randy claim to have come up with the name ‘Valve’ while playing poker with Gaben? And then Gaben came out saying it was all bullshit? That was fun.
Anyone offer any proof?
Are there receipts?
Or are you believing who you want to?
So hold it against him forever then. Good call.And we're not happy with Colonial Marines.
Tall tale is different from a lie, but I wasn’t sitting there with them, so now we can only take their own recollections as facts.Randy admitted it. To repost what I wrote about the situation earlier this year:
Or the time he told an interviewer that Gabe Newell wanted to name his company Gearbox, but lost that choice to Pitchford in a poker game, so he instead had to "settle" for Valve.
"After about four or five hours of play, that opportunity came and the showdown finally happened. The funny thing is that the hand that decided it wasn't that significant of a hand as far as Hold 'em Poker goes. It wasn't one of those Royal-Flush-Over-Quad-Aces kinds of hands that you see in the movies. I still remember the hand, though I'm sure Gabe wouldn't remember. The hand was top pair over middle pair. I was playing AK suited and he was playing K9 off suit (a hand known as "Saw Mill"). Obviously I tried to build a bit a of a pot pre-flop and got a lot of callers before it was Gabe's turn to act and astonishingly he came over the top with a massive over-bet. His action isolated us down to just the two of us in the hand, which gave me a HUGE advantage in this situation (I mentioned that Gabe hadn't played a lot of poker, right?). Anyway, the board came K-8-2 mixed suits and we were both pot committed so, of course, the money went in.
The next two cards were blanks, which is what the expected results were when I got the money in. I had him covered, so that knocked him out of the game! I did it! By knocking him out, I won a lot of chips, but more importantly I won the wager and with it I won the name 'Gearbox.' We got to keep the whole, big awesome Gearbox and Gabe had to settle for just being the Valve.
ALL of this was a lie, btw. Or admitted after the fact to be a "tall tale" as Pitchford put it, once Gabe clarified none of that was remotely true.
http://archive.fo/Z0MoO
Hey, even better, there's an archive link to the full original Joystiq article: https://archive.fo/YYh58
Tall tale is different from a lie, but I wasn’t sitting there with them, so now we can only take their own recollections as facts.
I personally think there was a bit of truth in there, but who knows anymore?
I imagine listening to the feedback from the first time the epic store got exclusive rights to a game would be a good start to making gamers voices be better heard. Sure it was mostly outrage, but shouldn’t outrage still be acknowledged? I'm interested in what you mean by “the bullshit that comes with” gamers voices being heard, because it sounds like you’re already biased against the opinions of them.So how do you fix it? It happens all sites. An exclusive comes out and it gets 10/10 or 0/10 all the time.
If there’s a small controversy it gets hit with a bunch of low rated scores.
How would you make gamers voices be better heard, without all the bullshit that comes with it?
Or are you trying to say it’s fine, as is?
All the time I see people saying gamers are the problem, or reviews are the problem, or curation is the problem.
We obviously know what the problems are, but what are the solutions?
Why is everyone so quick to criticize, without being able to offer a solution to it?