MightySquirrel
Banned
Should be at 90 mill by now. It's that good. Top 2-3 games of last gen.
Last edited:
1- No. On pc can be much better. Almost half the lag.
2- Yes. A game where the controls don't suck so much.
No, it's not. With Vsync off it can be pretty much always almost half the lag.Can be, but most of the time it's basically the same.
Ok, glad we've established the game just isn't for you.
I rebought it on Series X just because that runs at 4k, too bad theres no workaround for the 30fps
So your opinion means nothing? Gotcha.Barely put two hours in, if that.
I’ve been meaning to get to it, I swear!So your opinion means nothing? Gotcha.
Gentlemen, gentlemen... Please. No need for beefin' up in here.
Some of us like the game. Fine.
Some others don't like the game. Also perfectly fine.
No need for either side to insult the other. If you like or dislike the game, praise or criticize it on its own merits.
Beefin' is not part of Dutch's GODDAMN PLAN!!
Release date: 2031, then few delays, and 2033 is the year!
Mark your calendar
1 hour was waiting Arthur to start moving.Barely put two hours in, if that.
If you consoles guys are thinking a 60fps patch will make the game less clunky to control, it doesnt unfortunately.
The open world is even more restrictive than Cyberpunks, when on a mission anyway.Worst mission design I have ever seen in a game.
Atleast other games with similar "design" put you in a corridor so you can't take cover behind the wrong tree and get "mission failed".
My post was actually being playful, lol. I wasn't being serious at all, and I think most of us are just having fun on this.I do agree, and DeepEnigma as well the tone of my post wasn't needed. And I can see you, just like Egnima, got irked and took it the way you did. Fair enough.
I want it for the smoother framerate like I enjoy on the PC version. The controls never bothered me and I quickly got used to them.If you consoles guys are thinking a 60fps patch will make the game less clunky to control, it doesnt unfortunately.
My post was actually being playful, lol. I wasn't being serious at all, and I think most of us are just having fun on this.
It was out of character indeed
Haha
And yet we don't have a next-gen patch for it... F you rockstar.
Just remember, they pulled support and won't even be fucked with a 60fps patch.
R* has devolved.
60 fps or the game might not even exist.
I cry evertime it's on sale and I remember it's 30 fps.
Yet no 60fps patch like every dev who gives a damn.
And yet Rockstar treats it like the red headed stepchild. No 60 fps patch, no remaster, no single player DLC, etc.
Patch in 60 fps you cowards.
So much salt.Give us a fucking 60 FPS barebones patch at least R* you fucks.
So much salt.
Guys... Guys... Guys... Guys...
Surrender ! Rockstars is all in on GT6, you'll be dead before to see RDR2 at 60FPS on PS5, Series X. FACTS.
Buy a death star new PC to play it or... "Jump in" Stadia : It's 60FPS "For the players"
HU HU HU HU
Must be amazing on PC.I already have it on PC. I want it on consoles too.
Single player, yes. Minus the patch over a year ago that messed some shit up that they seemingly can’t be fucked with fixing now. All hands on deck for the next GTAO, I mean 6.Must be amazing on PC.
Of all time, of all time.
Yet R* still can be bothered to support Red Dead Online even despite the very vocal demand from the player base, or patch RDR2 for current gen. Absolute madness.
So much salt.
Guys... Guys... Guys... Guys...
Surrender ! Rockstars is all in on GT6, you'll be dead before to see RDR2 at 60FPS on PS5, Series X. FACTS.
Buy a death star new PC to play it or... "Jump in" Stadia : It's 60FPS "For the players"
HU HU HU HU
this is truly one of the most vile things i've witnessed first hand.
RDO needed work, but had a magnificent foundation to build on, and deserved better support, it never got a fair shot.
But hey business is business right? you can semi understand if online wasn't pulling in any money, but the single player game being the 9th best selling game of all time, deserved a proper PS5/Series upgrade, and would not have cost much to do, the PC port already has higher level assets. But they won't even do that...
Other publishers are watching rockstar like they've done hit their head. It's so baffling to piss this magnificent game down the shitter.
Another piece of shit developer, though to a lesser degree than rdr2, is 2k who developed Mafia Remake. Imagine a game released 2 months before the next gen consoles came out which sold well yet they couldn't be bothered to patch in 60 fps.Yet no 60fps patch like every dev who gives a damn.
I'd even be OK with $10 again as long as it's not just 60 fps and improves a few other settings. The real crime is not doing anything and letting the game languish on next gen at 30 fps.They will give it the GTA V treatment next year (probably, they need to release something if gta 6 not ready), as in reprint and upgrade path instead of free patch. And goddamn it they will get my money.
I bought it for $30, when the regular price was still $60. Don't know if the regular price has been permanently lowered, but the game goes on sale, at a minimum (sorted from most to least predictable):By the way, since a PS5 upgrade is out of the question now, does this game ever go on sale on Steam?