• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Remember Me - Review Thread

Alice Madness Returns was my game of 2011 and it got destroyed by reviewers.

not saying Remember Me will be the same or anything (didn't play it yet) but I just can't trust reviewers these days, especially on non AAA games.

This is what always makes this complicated with these games. Loved Alice Madness Returns.
 
This is what always makes this complicated with these games. Loved Alice Madness Returns.

But also interesting. I am sad because I hope it doesn't impact the sales of this game...which it will. But it is so interesting to see so many people love a game, and so many people hate it and not the typical internet love hate but a concentrated effort by all to get through a game and the total weirdness that occasionally ensues.
 
I think the IGN reviewer was attempting to do the same thing with his review score, or at least that's my interpretation of it.

He wanted to represent the game on the high side of failure (59) rather than the low side of mediocrity (60). It's a very subtle distinction (if it even exists, maybe I'm giving the reviewer more credit than he deserves), but I'm certainly not opposed to someone using a 100 point scale if it's given to them.

yeah, maybe. cuz i think it basically has more to do with him just being a prick than anything else :) ...
 
"As it stands, Remember Me is a game that offers about six to eight hours of disposable entertainment"

The reviews are about what I expected, but the length is what ensures that if i buy this it won't be until it's $10 somewhere. Shame when devs try something new and it doesn't work out.
 
I smell a BOMBA. Obviously I've never played it, but everything I've read thus far sounds like the game was a good idea that was not executed properly.
 
too many inconsistent scores being published - look, I've enjoyed games that were on the average scale rated "mediocre" or in the area of 6 out of 10 with certain games that became some of my favorite games I've played. SO going by what seems to be more of a mid 7ish out of 10 game...that is and SHOULD be considered a good game.

I think too many base their opinions on good games if they are on average high 8's and 9's out of 10.

I cannot remember how many damn times I've played a game with overall average scores at best that i had an absolute blast and this is coming from way back to my early days of gaming with my Atari 2600, Amiga 500, C64, Nintendo, Master System,etc to present day.

I am more of a mature gamer in my mid 30's...I've been there done that as far as these reviews go. I am not saying a gamer cannot get a decent idea of how bad or good a game is by the overall reviews averaged out...but if you see inconsistencies with reviews like we are seeing with Remember Me...it may do you some good to just play the game for what it is and enjoy it for its qualities and overlook the negatives...

If your wallet is tight at the moment..wait for a sale or buy used but dont write the game off as a dud until you play it...it's NOT getting all crap reviews.
 
Metacritic of 69/100? Doomed.

Has there been a single successful game in the last 5 years that was panned so severely in reviews? I can't think of any.
 
Metacritic of 69/100? Doomed.

Has there been a single successful game in the last 5 years that was panned so severely in reviews? I can't think of any.

Binary Domain, my fav of last year, is only a 68/100 on metacritic. That was the watershed moment for reviews and I.

Sales wise, :(. You're right there
 
As expected. It never clicked with me. It's gonna be that game that looked kind of interesting before the release and will be completely forgotten after that.
 
lol @ "inconsistent scores". it's called different people having different opinions. it happens all the time in movies, books, music, etc reviews but when it happens on videogame reviews suddenly it's something suspect.
 
Games like Alpha Protocol, Binary Domain and hopefully Remember Me are all good games that reviewers who are forced to play so much dreck aren't able to look past the flaws. I am hoping the interesting world and story are able to elevate it above average game play.
 
How is that hard to understand? Its decent and somepeople might appreciate it more, but at its current price, maybe you should wait.

If a film reviewer said that no one would say anything.

Are you kidding me? If a film reviewer said that I would immediately stop reading them, burn any publication related to them and laugh at them for the rest of eternity.

A film reviewer may say "this film is destined for cult classic status", they do not at all say it's forgettable today and "cult classic another day." A forgettable film NEVER becomes a cult classic. Even a 'bad' film that eventually becomes a cult classic was never forgettable, almost by definition.

It's just typical horrendous game journalistic writing. No need to defend.
 
A film reviewer may say "this film is destined for cult classic status", they do not at all say it's forgettable today and "cult classic another day." A forgettable film NEVER becomes a cult classic. Even a 'bad' film that eventually becomes a cult classic was never forgettable, almost by definition.

It's just typical horrendous game journalistic writing. No need to defend.

Yep I'm behind this post 100%. That comment was ridiculous, made no sense, and the fact they changed it shows they knew they fucked up.
 
Metacritic of 69/100? Doomed.

Has there been a single successful game in the last 5 years that was panned so severely in reviews? I can't think of any.

If you're talking about sales I suppose you would be correct.

I bet if Remember Me had a 90 on Metacritic it would still bomb hard, though.

Are you kidding me? If a film reviewer said that I would immediately stop reading them, burn any publication related to them and laugh at them for the rest of eternity.

A film reviewer may say "this film is destined for cult classic status", they do not at all say it's forgettable today and "cult classic another day." A forgettable film NEVER becomes a cult classic. Even a 'bad' film that eventually becomes a cult classic was never forgettable, almost by definition.

It's just typical horrendous game journalistic writing. No need to defend.
I definitely agree with this.

What a stupid thing to say in a review.
 
I wonder how sales of this game will compare with Fuse.

Let's see. 37th in the UK and the UK is somewhat similar to the US in taste and we are talking about a shooter. I think Remember Me will end up selling better on a global scale although NPD (US/NA based) will have Fuse higher.
 
Kotaku - YES/Should You Play This Game?

At first, I thought that Remember Me would be one of those games where I liked its ideas more than its execution. But, even though it's surrounded by some rough gameplay and well-worn templates, the core concept behind the game—control over what we choose to hold onto—comes to life in ambitious ways.
 
Metacritic of 69/100? Doomed.

Has there been a single successful game in the last 5 years that was panned so severely in reviews? I can't think of any.

just for the psp:

yggdra union: we'll never fight alone: 73
corpse party: 71
god eater burst: 71
monster hunter freedom: 71
kenka bancho: badass rumble 70
gungnir: 68
riviera: the promised land: 68
medievil: resurrection: 66

i think these games were more or less 'successful' - ie, earned back the investment plus (i also really enjoyed them all, btw). now, if you're asking 'were there any games that made tons of money while being thoroughly trashed by reviewers?', that's something else :) ...
 
If you're talking about sales I suppose you would be correct.

I bet if Remember Me had a 90 on Metacritic it would still bomb hard, though.

What exactly did this game have to differentiate itself in a very competitive environment?

That some publisher turned it down for having a female protagonist? I don't think a bit of manufactured controversy is enough to get people to drop $60 on a game today.

Looks like there were plenty of reasons for publishers to turn this down, and the female protagonist was the least of their concerns.
 
Forget Remember Me, and buy Gunpoint immediately. You won't regret it.

ixFzHDov6AEcI.gif

Gunpoint thread

What the fuck? People do this now? Go into threads and advertise completely unrelated games?
 
just for the psp:

yggdra union: we'll never fight alone: 73
corpse party: 71
god eater burst: 71
monster hunter freedom: 71
kenka bancho: badass rumble 70
gungnir: 68
riviera: the promised land: 68
medievil: resurrection: 66

i think these games were more or less 'successful' - ie, earned back the investment plus (i also really enjoyed them all, btw). now, if you're asking 'were there any games that made tons of money while being thoroughly trashed by reviewers?', that's something else :) ...

Never heard of any of those except Monster Hunter, which has a fanatical following in Japan and would probably be financially successful even if it scored 6/100 on Metacritic.

But those games aren't comparable to would be console blockbusters like Remember Me. Remember Me is competing for the same kind of demographics that Tomb Raider or Battlefield or COD are competing for, top tier $60 releases.
 
Not surprised at all by the reviews. It was mostly a low-profile game to begin with. That's unfortunate though, because it's just another game that was released by Crapcom this gen.
 
Never heard of any of those except Monster Hunter, which has a fanatical following in Japan and would probably be financially successful even if it scored 6/100 on Metacritic.

But those games aren't comparable to would be console blockbusters like Remember Me. Remember Me is competing for the same kind of demographics that Tomb Raider or Battlefield or COD are competing for, top tier $60 releases.

is it? are all $60 games automatically in direct competition with cod? or is it more a matter of 'can the return on sales exceed the production/marketing costs'? cuz i think it's the later. otherwise, if you're correct, that'd mean that we've got literally shelffuls of bombas out there (as in, over 90% of all games released this gen :) )...
 
These scores make that one thread about buying Remember Me on principle lolz-worthy.

With that said, I'll get it on a good Steam sale down the line.
 
The reviews seem pretty low, shame for all the people who were expecting greatness from it. But I'm sure it will be enjoyable for what it is, just never got to the level it should have been by the sound of it.

It sounds like it suffers from that Bioshock Infinite scenario, where you have an amazing looking world that you wanna explore deeply, but can't
 
It sounds like it suffers from that Bioshock Infinite scenario, where you have an amazing looking world that you wanna explore deeply, but can't

I think that's becoming a bigger problem nowadays. Developers maybe don't want to create an open world, but if your environments are at all cool, you should have, dammit! They gotta step up a bit to meet new expectations, I guess.

I'm not sure about all this "gameplay has to match the themes/story" business (also a rising topic). That makes sense with BioShock Infinite, but I saw complaints about that with Remember Me. But BI's gameplay and story/themes (of violence) clashed while it just seems like reviewers wanted more of the story/themes in Remember Me's gameplay ... is that fair? Are we overanalyzing or expecting too much? I dunno.
 
The reviews seem pretty low, shame for all the people who were expecting greatness from it. But I'm sure it will be enjoyable for what it is, just never got to the level it should have been by the sound of it.

It sounds like it suffers from that Bioshock Infinite scenario, where you have an amazing looking world that you wanna explore deeply, but can't

the wise man expects, at the most, goodness, & is therefore always surprised & delighted by greatness...

i said that :) ...
 
lol @ "inconsistent scores". it's called different people having different opinions. it happens all the time in movies, books, music, etc reviews but when it happens on videogame reviews suddenly it's something suspect.

I think what people are getting at is, there's no consensus here in the actual text of the reviews. A large percentage of reviews are praising what another large percentage are panning. People are just finding this curious and confusing, no one is surprised different people have different opinions.

Binary Domain, my fav of last year, is only a 68/100 on metacritic. That was the watershed moment for reviews and I.

Sales wise, :(. You're right there

Ouch, I didn't know BD was that low. I enjoyed the first 1/3 quite a bit, still need to finish it.
 
Top Bottom