• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Report: Christopher Nolan to be offered Bond 24

Status
Not open for further replies.
In retrospect, Skyfall is a pretty lousy film. Even the acting is low-tier, Judy Dench's performance is poor, as you can see she is visibly bored because she's usually looking elsewhere in her scenes.
 
The only recent Bond film that still holds any water is Casino Royale. They should have just followed with a more accurate Live and Let Die. But no we got a clip show.
 
i7vaddsnxlunnggjiu.gif

Sad that this movie had better fights than all Craig Bonds and Nolan's Batmans
 
Welp. There goes any good action sequences movie hopes.
Fixed.

This will in fact be the first Bond movie where they explain and re-explain what will happen for 3/4 of the movie only to play out through disappointing action sequences that resolve all the things explained in the most predictable manner possible according to the completely uninteresting and heavy handed allegory in everything.
 
TDKR sucked. the other two batman movies are still awesome. inception's vault scene was the best thing nolan has ever done in his life. no nolan for bond. he's shit at action. fuck anne hathaway and marion cotillard.

that is all.

When Cillian Murphy's character confronts his dad? YES!

What is wrong with Anne or Marion as actresses? Both very well accomplished actresses.

BTW I don't see this happening. He is busy with Interstellar so that would mean Bond 24 movie at the earliest would be released 2016. Considering how well Skyfall did worldwide I doubt the Bond team will want to wait 4 years between movies. Strike while the iron is hot.

For the record (again; getting tired of having to repeat this lol), Nolan will NEVER* direct a Bond film. There are a bevy of reasons why, but the only one that matters is control. Nolan has a prime gig at Warner - he has nearly 100% creative control. Bond is the complete opposite. It's 100% a producer run gig. Barbara Broccoli and Micheal G. Wilson call all the shots. You take on the director's role on Bond, you do what they tell you too. Being a Bond director means being a yes man to a certain extent. Nolan has too much clout at Warner to become a director for hire for EON.

*the only possible exception being, as Busty has already noted, if MGM goes tits up and sells to Warners.

Well wouldn't the only exception be that they do give up that creative control? Or because Nolan got into making movies cause of the Bond franchise (he grew up loving those movies), that he relinquishes some of the privileges he has earned and enjoys.

But yeah I would love for this to happen but I don't see it. Problem is if the producers can retain control and still get a highly reputable director like Mendes and make so much money, why wouldn't they go that route again?

People on the internet are part of the real world. There are no monolithic opinions.

A very small insignificant portion of the world when you look at the results of his movies critically and commercially compared to the "hate" on forums.

Wait what Sculli is banned too? What happened?
 
A very small insignificant portion of the world when you look at the results of his movies critically and commercially compared to the "hate" on forums.

A very small and insignificant part? LOL. Everyone that matters agrees with you, right? Hate in quotation marks, you are gold.

Edit: Ah crap, you aren't the guy I initially replied to. Taking that context away makes your post less hilarious. Damn it. Still, I would argue the small and insignifcant part vehemently.
 
sculi and solo are banned.

who will fill their place?

If Nolan comes anywhere near my precious bond, I'll royale quantum his ass so goldfingeringly hard, he will be licenced to die with my permission to die, Alfred.

That's my audition
 
Gotta love hypocrites.

Fuck Nolan, POS! Bring back the Green Lantern guy or any of the other subpar directors EON saved a buck on!
 
I love Nolan, and I loved Skyfall. What does that make of me :O

Although I'm guessing I loved Skyfall because it borrowed so much from Nolan's TDK. :lol I'd definitely like a Bond movie not only directed by Nolan but also with him involved in the creation of the screenplay. However, I agree that the timeframe is a bit too tight for this to happen. I guess it will depend on how much of a workaholic Nolan is and how much he wants the job. And we all know his lifelong dream is to direct a Bond movie, so we'll see.
 
I enjoyed Quantum of Solace more than Skyfall, and I fucking hated QOS. Even though it was a badly made movie, it still felt like a Bond movie, compared to that crap that was Skyfall which basically felt like a B level action movie starting Daniel Craig.

Nolan's movie can't be any worse than the last 2, why the fuck not? Because he made Rising?
 
If its true it will be the first Bond film I will watch, couldn't even get through the "mighty" Casino Royale without falling asleep. Nolan will definitely make a far more compelling film, I know Gaf hates him because TDKR but the guy made Memento and Prestige which is nothing to scoff about. Nolan will do right by Bond but I think it's too soon and he should only be brought on board for a new Bond not Craig.


I see. GAF is just going through the hate phase, I'm sure when Intersteller trailer is shown everyone and their mums would want Nolan to direct Bond. The guy is the perfect choice for Bond, you know it to be true in your hearts GAFolks.

So, you have never seen a Bond film but think Nolan is perfect for it? That makes no sense.

Nolan is a good director, just not the right fit for Bond. Like someone else said in the thread, Joe Wright would be a good fit. That guy would give us a killer Bond film if given the chance.
 
People don't have to worry about him doing this. He's too big a name to tie himself to Bond. Nolan is going to do his own thing now.
 
Skyfall was an entire movie that glorified everything that is wrong with bond films. Awful awful fucking movie.

I thought it was remarkably well restrained and exactly what the franchise needed after Quantum of Solace. It hardly glorified everything that's wrong with Bond - you only have to look to the latter day Brosnan Bond films to see that.
 
People don't have to worry about him doing this. He's too big a name to tie himself to Bond. Nolan is going to do his own thing now.

I don't know where people are getting this. I doubt he'll wan't to get involved while he doesn't have the freedom to really put his own stamp on the franchise (certainly not 24 if the script is already written), but my understanding of the man is that it's like his life's ambition to direct a Bond film.
 
Guess any hopes for a well-developed female role in this are now out the window.

For those saying Nolan is not the right fit: what, exactly, makes him the wrong fit? Many of his movies are about obsessive/vengeful males. That's not far from similar motifs explored with the Craig Bond movies.
 
People don't have to worry about him doing this. He's too big a name to tie himself to Bond. Nolan is going to do his own thing now.

Oh is that why he always wanted to do a Bond movie, and when they didn't let him he made Inception which was... his Bond movie....

Man even Steven Spielberg wanted to do a Bond movie. Hell Quentin Tarantino got turned down.

You guys are smoking heavy shit trying to downplay just how big Bond is. But I'll let you boys and girls have your cake and eat it.

Guess any hopes for a well-developed female role in this are now out the window.

For those saying Nolan is not the right fit: what, exactly, makes him the wrong fit? Many of his movies are about obsessive/vengeful males. That's not far from similar motifs explored with the Craig Bond movies.

Skyfall already happened. It's basically a Nolan movie, but much better looking. No need to repeat the deed.
 
People don't have to worry about him doing this. He's too big a name to tie himself to Bond. Nolan is going to do his own thing now.

I think you underestimate how much he loved Bond growing up. He probably could do any of his own projects but this might be a dream job opportunity he can't pass up.

Do you really think the success of his movies has to do with him as a director or the marketing behemoth behind him? And critically Dark Knight Rises got a 78 metacritic which is pretty average http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-dark-knight-rises

Well for his Batman movies, the success and reception of Begins helped TDK, and then obviously the huge reaction to TDK helped build the hype for TDKR.

But yes a lot of carry over success does come from people enjoying his movies. He built his name up to the point now that his name alone guarantees a certain amount of audience at the box office. Inception is proof of that. New IP, right dab in the middle of summer, and a story while not earth shattering, wasn't as straight forward or even full of action as your typical blockbuster.

Of course marketing his movies and his name now is a big part of it.

78 metacritic is average now? Batman Begins isat 70 and TDK at 82. The best reviewed of his 3 Batman movies sits only 4 points higher. Yes that is better but TDKR isn't far off. My point was that the hate on the message boards doesn't correlate one bit with the success commercially and critically overall.

I think most movies which get a 78 metacritic, 87 rotten tomatoes, and make over a billion dollars at the box office would be considered at least good. BTW a lot of the top movies last year (the ones nominated for best picture) also hover around high 70s to mid 80s.

BTW don't mean to say critics and their views are more important than your own taste, likes, and dislikes or that their word is gospel. And of course movies are so subjective there can never be consensus or a perfect 100% reviewed movie.

A very small and insignificant part? LOL. Everyone that matters agrees with you, right? Hate in quotation marks, you are gold.

Yes insignificant if you look at the performance of the movie with critics and audiences. If you went just on the reception here on GAF you would think it was one of the worst movies released last year and made no money.
 
Yes insignificant if you look at the performance of the movie with critics and audiences. If you went just on the reception here on GAF you would think it was one of the worst movies released last year and made no money.

A lot of movie-GAF were also in a hurry to claim The Hobbit was a flop after its first couple of weeks.
 
I am not a fan of Nolan but he would be an idiot to take it. 2nd tier franchise like Bond only deserve hack jobs like Len Wiseguy.
 
Stop giving Nolan action movies please. He shined with the Prestige and it's been a slow decline since then IMO. His action scenes are the worst. Literally the worst.
 
Now that Pfister is doing his own thing, it will be interesting to see how Nolan's action sequences turn out. I always wonder how much of it was his directing, the DP, and/or the editor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom