• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Resistance fall of man > Resistance 3

I haven't beat the game yet, but I'm only few chapters away from beating the game.

I think R3 plays exactly like R1. they brought the R1 formula back, especially the weapon inventory.

so far, I think the game feels like any generic classic shooter out there and it's boring.
 
MrPliskin said:
You Ignore every other post in this thread disagreeing, lol. You shouldn't pretend like you hadn't made up your mind long ago about this...

Try the demo, I'm confident you'll disagree with the OP.
I powered up my PS3, went through about 10-15 minutes of PSN updates, scrolled through the terms of service, all in the hopes of downloading this demo of R3 you mentioned. I don't see it.

I hate you.
 
Dax01 said:
I powered up my PS3, went through about 10-15 minutes of PSN updates, scrolled through the terms of service, all in the hopes of downloading this demo of R3 you mentioned. I don't see it.

I hate you.
I'm sorry dude, I should have mentioned it was on the EU store :-( Blame Grace Chen, not me!
 
Resistance 2 > Resistance 3 > Resistance 1

The multiplayer in Resistance 2 was pretty amazing, especially the 8-player co-op. It was a game that actually pushed the envelope and raised the bar, that's why it scored well. The single player was pretty good as well, with some gigantic enemies and wonderful weapons. I actually played it for a month and got 10k kills which was required for the platinum. It's a bit disappointing that the game raised so much bitterness and bile in many. It really wasn't that bad, and it's pretty much the best game in the franchise i.e., when you look at the overall package.

I kind of liked the Resistance 1 SP, but it took me a while to finish it because it wasn't that interesting. The multiplayer was solid, and I actually had a lot of fun playing this, but I wouldn't rate it higher than Resistance 2, but it is definitely better than the third.

Resistance 3 was a mixed bag for me. The SP was pretty awesome and lovingly crafted. It has the best SP in the series but the multiplayer is so generic and I really can't see how it stands out compared to some of the other multiplayer games out there. Although, some of the maps are well designed. I stopped playing this after a few weeks, so it really didn't pull me in for some reason.

I really miss those days, playing Resistance 2 co-op with my friends and abusing the hell out of the Medic class lol.
 
MrPliskin said:
I'm sorry dude, I should have mentioned it was on the EU store :-( Blame Grace Chen, not me!

Why didn't the demo ever show up on the American PSN? Between that and the patching, it seems like Sony and Insomniac are trying to do their best to eff up the launch of a great game. Because it is a great game.
 
R3 was short, too short but I still think it was the best in the series. R1 felt very poorly paced and a bit boring although still fun. R2 was just something else, kind of average and not so much fun.

3 made me want more resistance games, which the other two never did. Although 1 does have the superior MP.
 
Meisadragon said:
Resistance 2 > Resistance 3 > Resistance 1

The multiplayer in Resistance 2 was pretty amazing, especially the 8-player co-op. It was a game that actually pushed the envelope and raised the bar, that's why it scored well. The single player was pretty good as well, with some gigantic enemies and wonderful weapons. I actually played it for a month and got 10k kills which was required for the platinum. It's a bit disappointing that the game raised so much bitterness and bile in many. It really wasn't that bad, and it's pretty much the best game in the franchise i.e., when you look at the overall package.

I kind of liked the Resistance 1 SP, but it took me a while to finish it because it wasn't that interesting. The multiplayer was solid, and I actually had a lot of fun playing this, but I wouldn't rate it higher than Resistance 2, but it is definitely better than the third.

Resistance 3 was a mixed bag for me. The SP was pretty awesome and lovingly crafted. It has the best SP in the series but the multiplayer is so generic and I really can't see how it stands out compared to some of the other multiplayer games out there. Although, some of the maps are well designed. I stopped playing this after a few weeks, so it really didn't pull me in for some reason.

I really miss those days, playing Resistance 2 co-op with my friends and abusing the hell out of the Medic class lol.
How can people's opinions be so wrong!?
LLShC.gif


Resistance: Fall of Man had the best multiplayer by a mile. Resistance 2 introduced a neat concept with co-op, but the amount of pure fun and enjoyment I got out of FoM's competitive multiplayer lasted more than a year. Single player was a side-show with an interesting universe, but multiplayer is what made Resistance and whoever was responsible for it is obviously just not working at IG anymore.

R:FoM- Fast, Exciting, Fun, Unique, Addictive
R2- I HERD U LYKE CALL OF DUTY
 
Resistance 1 had more enemy variety. different ranked chimera. better weapons. yea the pacing was all over the place, but when you came to those epic battles. resistance 3 doesnt even come close.

they had the perfect formula.
 
StateofMind said:
Resistance: Fall of Man had the best multiplayer by a mile. Resistance 2 introduced a neat concept with co-op, but the amount of pure fun and enjoyment I got out of FoM's competitive multiplayer lasted more than a year. Single player was a side-show with an interesting universe, but multiplayer is what made Resistance and whoever was responsible for it is obviously just not working at IG anymore.

R:FoM- Fast, Exciting, Fun, Unique, Addictive
R2- I HERD U LYKE CALL OF DUTY
I did say I liked the Resistance 1 MP, but the MP in Resistance 2 wasn't that CODified. It took real skill to kill someone with the Carbine or Bullseye. Resistance 3 MP is much, much easier compared to the first two games. Killing 10 people with the Plasma Cannon secondary fire in the Resistance 2 MP is one of the most exhilarating things ever. As an overall package, Resistance 2 is easily the best game in the franchise.

Although, it depends really. I spent a lot of time playing Resistance 2, so obviously I like it lot more.
 
Meisadragon said:
I did say I liked the Resistance 1 MP, but the MP in Resistance 2 wasn't that CODified. It took real skill to kill someone with the Carbine or Bullseye. Resistance 3 MP is much, much easier compared to the first two games. Killing 10 people with the Plasma Cannon secondary fire in the Resistance 2 MP is one of the most exhilarating things ever. As an overall package, Resistance 2 is easily the best game in the franchise.

Although, it depends really. I spent a lot of time playing Resistance 2, so obviously I like it lot more.

You want to talk about skill? Rfom by farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr was the best example of skill showcase. Target bombs and headshots with the carbine were only for the skilled. R2 was just shit and required little skill. The carbine was the worst gun in any game I've played.
 
Agreed. Single-player wise, R1 > R3 > R2.

R1 just felt more of a gamer's game than both R3 and R2 ever did.

The co-op introduced in R2 was revolutionary to say the least though.
 
TEH-CJ said:
Resistance 1 had more enemy variety. different ranked chimera. better weapons. yea the pacing was all over the place, but when you came to those epic battles. resistance 3 doesnt even come close.

they had the perfect formula.
I feel like (rather, I know) that you are remembering how many "epic" battles there are, but absolutely forgetting how much time you spend alone in extremely similar skirmishes in R1 (quite similar to R3, in fact).

I don't have an issue with you liking one over the other, but it's pretty poor of you to make a thread about something subjective, and the try to rally the troops for your cause.

In my opinion, the FoM formula simply isn't profitable in today's shooter market.
 
TEH-CJ said:
Resistance 1 had more enemy variety. different ranked chimera. better weapons. yea the pacing was all over the place, but when you came to those epic battles. resistance 3 doesnt even come close.

they had the perfect formula.

I love the
pub fight and NY levels
in R3. I also like the variety from shotgunnng the Grimms to the Widowmaker fights.

I love the mall, the stalker skirmish, and the Angel fight in RFOM.

They are both pretty good, but R3 has more atmosphere and appears more seamless + better paced.
 
Agree with OP. Enjoyed R3 but the British setting, voice over narrative outlining the story as you progress, vehicle sections and Hale character puts R:FoM ahead. Some of the street battles in R:FoM were pretty intense too. Did love the Mutator in R3 though.
 
Kenshin001 said:
Agree with OP. Enjoyed R3 but the British setting, voice over narrative outlining the story as you progress, vehicle sections and Hale character puts R:FoM ahead. Some of the street battles in R:FoM were pretty intense too. Did love the Mutator in R3 though.

did Hale even have a defined character in R1?
 
R1 had the best atmosphere and feel, it was a fun lengthy game and no section outstayed its welcomes.

R2 was a horrific shit-fest and those stating it as the best in the series need to be banned for life from gaming.

R3 was good fun, the atmosphere fell between its predecessors but made it work. The gameplay was smooth and consistent, while not as long as R1 it didnt feel rushed.



R1>R3>RR>>>>>>>>>CoD>>>aids>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hitler>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R2
 
madmaxx350 said:
did Hale even have a defined character in R1?

Not really. The outsider I guess. Enigmatic. His connection to the Chimera was more interesting to me than Capelli's story. Also, Capelli was a douche in R2 so it was hard to reconcile that with the same person in R3.
 
i loved the mass battles in rfom,it was call of duty with aliens,simple but perfect

resistance 2 was god awful from start to finish,resistance 3 is great again but i haven't finished it yet,the prison level was resistance 2 kind of bad though but the gunplay is definitely the best in the series

right now i would rate them rfom > retribution > 3 >>>>>>>>> 2
 
RFOM had better weapons and enemy variety. And better image quality.

However the story is very simple, the npcs are complete copies of each other, and the health system is annoying. R3 has more spectacle and better atmosphere too.
 
Himself said:
The Resistance series has followed the God of War series' arc. The first game in each series has the best story, the most cohesive design and focus. The second game in each series is basically a diversion, a complete mis-step. And the third in each series has the most refined gameplay but lacks the allure of the the first games.

If you are saying Gears of War, then ok (But only for MP). If you are saying God of War then get the fuck outta here. Number 2 was far and away the best of the series.
 
madmaxx350 said:
did Hale even have a defined character in R1?

He was the quiet bad ass killer. I love the the rooftops when some military people are talking and they say something like

"Only one survived, bald kind a quiet". Yup that was Hale.

Then in R2 he all of a sudden became some big shot talkative annoying leader. Uhhhh okay Insomniac, that's how the world works, sure.

dalin80 said:
R1 had the best atmosphere and feel, it was a fun lengthy game and no section outstayed its welcomes.

R2 was a horrific shit-fest and those stating it as the best in the series need to be banned for life from gaming.

R3 was good fun, the atmosphere fell between its predecessors but made it work. The gameplay was smooth and consistent, while not as long as R1 it didnt feel rushed.



R1>R3>RR>>>>>>>>>CoD>>>aids>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hitler>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R2

2lmrjme.gif
 
I cant agree, to me everything was better in R3 the atmosphere much better the fights were better and the levels were better.
 
I agree. Resistance 1 was definitely more fun and better all the way around except graphically (is still a much cleaner looking game though). Resistance 3 was rather dull with an epic load of "WTF" that made me laugh more than anything. Ending was absolutely pathetic.
 
I was disappointed that there
was not more boss fight/gigantic bosses in R3

Pachterballs said:
thanks OP. Will wait for R3 to hit bargain bin. $20 or less.
Should you not read the counter arguments to make that decision?
 
canadian crowe said:
I don't get why each game is very different in tone. I just got to chapter 13 in Resistance 3. Good lord it's dark.



RFoM was damaged by idiot reviewers who only played the first two levels before running to their PC's screaming OMG! BROWN!!!, insomniac kind of over-reacted with colour and scale and tried to incorporate CoD style mechanics which simply didnt fit causing the utter vomit inducing mess that was R2. This left them in a bit of tricky spot, RFoM was loved by fans while R3 gained the support from the mouth breathing pond life reviewers or ''games journalists''. R3 is almost an exact middle ground of the two.




Beam said:
I was disappointed that there
was not more boss fight/gigantic bosses in R3


They didnt really work in R2, the regular fights were always much more fun and dint have as much buggy scripts and wonky AI. like R2's final boss fight which involved a epid walk around in a circle shooting a few light bulbs without ever having to see or worry about the main boss. Or the trial by death swarm thing.
 
Currently on my 2nd co-op playthrough of R3 on Superhuman to get the trophy.

Due to completing R3, replayed a lot of R2 and R1.

R1 > R2 > R3 for me.

R1 due to epic battles, more enemy variety, more gameplay variety with vehicles, pop up mines, environment, etc. Better story. From Manchester onwards R1 is great.

With R2, I hate the two weapon limit, the boss battles are weak. Normal is too easy, Hard is too hard and a grind to play. The Chimera homming in on you. The invisible enemies!

But R2 still has a better campaign than R3, once you put aside the bosses.

The Twin Falls Grim sequence is better than equivalent in R3. The two Chimera ship takedowns are better in R2. The Chicago bridge assualt and plaza is better than the New York Washington Square and Apartments snipe fest in R3.

R3 has the dull boat ride and then a dull train ride (what were they thinking!) R3 takes you to another Chimera ship for the final level (what again?) Too many shades of Half Life 2, with Prison, final ship level and you even meet an Reverend in the rip-off Ravenholm sequence.

There is an escort mission, a carry a bomb mission, sniper alley, this is all bad trite gameplay design.

R1 let you drive a Stalker, a tank and a jeep, and introduced the crazy weapon wheel, the gameplay has been going backwards ever since.

R3 is very on the rails, literally in too many sections. I was extremely disappointed.
 
I wanna know what happened to the Bullseye. Did they make it more like the carbine to balance multiplayer or something?

While we're at it, Fareye vs. Deadeye? There isn't much in gaming that satisfied me more than headshotting in R1, watching the blood stream out in slow motion.
 
TEH-CJ said:
Aside from resistance 3 having obviously better graphics and animations. R1 destroys it by a land slide. its not even close.

in terms of level design, enemy enounters and A1. resistance 1 nails it.

why insomniac didn't flesh out the resistance 1 formula is beyond me. they had the perfect foundation there. instead they went for a completely different route.

who agrees?
What? R1 does not have better level design than R3 in any way.R3 levels are more open than other Resistance games, has much more atmosphere than an level in R1.

TEH-CJ said:
yeah bro. last night actually.

resistance 3 was the years biggest disappointment to me. the campaign is the same length as mw2 for fuck sakes. it has little to no replay value.
No replay value? Are saying R1 had more replay value?
 
Loudninja said:
What? R1 does not have better level design than R3 in any way.R3 levels are more open than other Resistance games, has much more atmosphere than an level in R1.


No replay value? Are saying R1 had more replay value?

Really bro?. the bust depo in R1 is more open ended than anything in R3.
 
R2 > R3 REALLY!!?!?!?! R2 was a mess, a stupid COD clone stuffed in a resistance skin.

R3's campaign is best by far. the only thing it was lacking was that it didn't add much to the chimerian lore. Nothing was really explained. The ending was weak, but better than R1's. R2 and R:R had good endings.
 
Resistance 3 is painfully underrated both online and off... except in this thread. I like this thread.

I guess I should thank the OP for being wrong. It let me see that im not alone in thinking that R3 was so goddamn fun.


Also, R2 isn't terrible. It's not great. But people go a little nuts describing how shitty they think it is.
 
R2 is better than R3. there I said it. and no I'm not even trolling.

Just played through the train section in R3 again. WTF were you thinking insomniac??..fighting brain dead humans?..really??

the story is non existent. the pure chimera and the other alien race we keep hearing about do not even get mentioned.

I don't get it.

3 years in the makings and we get what? a 4 hour campaign and a tacked on mp.
 
Nick Laslett said:
Currently on my 2nd co-op playthrough of R3 on Superhuman to get the trophy.

Due to completing R3, replayed a lot of R2 and R1.

R1 > R2 > R3 for me.

R1 due to epic battles, more enemy variety, more gameplay variety with vehicles, pop up mines, environment, etc. Better story. From Manchester onwards R1 is great.

With R2, I hate the two weapon limit, the boss battles are weak. Normal is too easy, Hard is too hard and a grind to play. The Chimera homming in on you. The invisible enemies!

But R2 still has a better campaign than R3, once you put aside the bosses.

The Twin Falls Grim sequence is better than equivalent in R3. The two Chimera ship takedowns are better in R2. The Chicago bridge assualt and plaza is better than the New York Washington Square and Apartments snipe fest in R3.

R3 has the dull boat ride and then a dull train ride (what were they thinking!) R3 takes you to another Chimera ship for the final level (what again?) Too many shades of Half Life 2, with Prison, final ship level and you even meet an Reverend in the rip-off Ravenholm sequence.

There is an escort mission, a carry a bomb mission, sniper alley, this is all bad trite gameplay design.

R1 let you drive a Stalker, a tank and a jeep, and introduced the crazy weapon wheel, the gameplay has been going backwards ever since.

R3 is very on the rails, literally in too many sections. I was extremely disappointed.

this.
 
TEH-CJ said:
Aside from resistance 3 having obviously better graphics and animations. R1 destroys it by a land slide. its not even close.

in terms of level design, enemy enounters and A1. resistance 1 nails it.

why insomniac didn't flesh out the resistance 1 formula is beyond me. they had the perfect foundation there. instead they went for a completely different route.

who agrees?

Yep, I agree. First one is still the best one. Actually, I'd go as far as call it one of the best shooters this gen.
 
Loudninja said:
What? R1 does not have better level design than R3 in any way.R3 levels are more open than other Resistance games, has much more atmosphere than an level in R1.

It is all about quantity.

For me R3 has 2 really good sections.

1. St Louis - Grim Factory, VTOL Rescue, defend Pub, Post Office Ambush.

(This section is proceeded by dull boat ride . Then followed by trite bomb carry and escort mission. The Wideomaker boss encounter is a joke. You can stand in one spot to fight the whole battle!?)

2. Prison Sequence - Standout Chapter of the game, great from beginning to end. Starts with you losing all weapons, jail break, bit of stealth, then massive battle at end with enemies everywhere.

(This section is proceeded by dull train ride, but at least there is a good story twist.)

A few stand out levels:

1. Mining Town - Very Ravenholme like journey through Grim territory. Lots of atmosphear, jump moments. Only spoiled by boss section at the end, which is very similar to another game who name escapes me now, is it in HL2 Episode 2 where you have the same tunnel monster chase?

2. New York Apartments. This is a good snipfest if you like that sort of thing, finishing with an assualt on Chimeran base.

The problem is this is about 1 hours worth of good quality gameplay.

The rest of R3 is made up of the following. Slow start tutorial section, (run after me?! What?!) Dull boat ride, (What were they thinking?) Very undeveloped sniper stealth section, the gunship that turns up to hurry you along just underlines the lack of ideas here. This is followed by a badly designed Rocket launcher show down (Very HL2). That leaves the last level which is another assualt on a Chimera ship, very similar to end of R1 and we already did two ship assualts in R2.

For 2 years work building on the previous two games this is a pretty disappointing show. The Weapons wheel came back. But where were the mass assault battles with 20-30 men attacking a position? Where were the vehicle bits, hijacked Stalker vs Feral Widowmaker?
 
dalin80 said:
R1 had the best atmosphere and feel, it was a fun lengthy game and no section outstayed its welcomes.

R2 was a horrific shit-fest and those stating it as the best in the series need to be banned for life from gaming.

R3 was good fun, the atmosphere fell between its predecessors but made it work. The gameplay was smooth and consistent, while not as long as R1 it didnt feel rushed.



R1>R3>RR>>>>>>>>>CoD>>>aids>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hitler>>>>>>>>>>>>>>R2

225227.gif
 
I could never understand why they never delved into the Cloven side story more. They hinted at it in R:FoM and then pretty much completely ignored it in the subsequent games.
 
Top Bottom