The original argument was about you apparently thinking the numbers are supposed to be an equation on their own.
I don't. What I do think is that it's almost endearing that the writers apparently want you to buy into the idea that someone came up with an equation that's meant to somehow predict how long mankind has to live,
and the numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42 play a super important role in it (because they're "universal constants" or whatevs). That would take either a huge amount of suspension of disbelief or a serious lack of familiarity with mathematics (
this article has some examples of boooooring real equations: they're not even peppered with recurring magical numbers!).
Like I said, they don't seem to know (or care?) what an equation looks like. Hell, even
the stuff they themselves came up with for the ARG shows a disturbing lack of 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42:
I won't even pretend to understand any of that, but yeah, looks legit enough for me!
On the other hand, when a character talks about 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42 being "core values" of an equation or whatever, I chuckle. "Er, mathematics are all about numbers, right? Yeah, sounds right, let's go with that!", the writer told himself.
And then you complain about me butchering math.
That's mostly the writers, really, but you're an accomplice, here!