JehutyRunner
Banned
All it needs is Martin Tyler commentating on it and, bam, you're onto a winner.
You can quite easily pull off pool/snooker type shots when comfortable with the control, then aerial skills make any ball reachable.
There is a ridiculous amount of depth in this game, not too much luck.
I'm not talking about pool shots I'm saying when you both hit the ball at the same time on say a type off or jump ball the ball does what it wants, again watch kronovi Gibbs it happens a ton.
You mean the ball does unexpected things when two people hit the ball in different ways?
No way.
Unexpected as in luck or chance based? For a major part of the game? No way!
Unexpected as in unexpected.
Unexpected as in luck or chance based? For a major part of the game? No way!
Again meaning you have no skill based control over it, making it chance dependant, and that happens a ton.
You make it sound like the game just picks a random direction for a ball to go in when two people hit it at the same time.
There's a chance of this happening even if two professional soccer/futbol players kick a ball at the exact same time. The skill portion of it is "don't let two people hit it at the same time"
Uhhhhhhh wut? How often does this happen in soccer during the course of a match?
Also this.
You make it sound like the game just picks a random direction for a ball to go in when two people hit it at the same time.
You don't have control over it is what I'm driving at.
For the record I'm talking mostly 1v1
You don't have control over it is what I'm driving at
Again meaning you have no skill based control over it, making it chance dependant, and that happens a ton.
We all get it. It's being disregarded because it's a weak argument.OK so you've missed the point then.
We all get it. It's being disregarded because it's a weak argument.
K so kronovi vs Gibbs with all the luck based goals and even kronovi saying so didn't happen then.
Nothing is unpredictable when it comes to sports. Human processing times are lacking but the rules of gravitational physics are pretty well defined. The physics of Rocket League are defined as well. There's no luck. There are only actions happening faster than humans can process.K so kronovi vs Gibbs with all the luck based goals and even kronovi saying so didn't happen then.
Luck happens in sports. Pucks and balls take weird bounces and deflect, often unpredictability. It's part of the sport, and it's part of Rocket League. All that matters is the physics in the game operate consistently and obey their own rules.
The majority of goals scored at a high level are still the result of skill.
Nothing is unpredictable when it comes to sports. Human processing times are lacking but the rules of gravitational physics are pretty well defined. The physics of Rocket League are defined as well. There's no luck. There are only actions happening faster than humans can process.
Listen I agree, however this is an e sport and if it has too much luck it may not gain too much traction. I prefaced by saying I could be wrong, but I wasbbasing that off the fact that in kronovi vs Gibbs the number 1 and 2 players in the world, having the same luck based issues happens weird bounce from collision to wide open net, tip off met at exact same time and Gibbs rolls over ball and kronovi comes out clean wide open. I'm just saying its got a lot of luck when it comes to the 1v1, which may hamper it, where say quake 3, fatal1ty, either wins it or blows it.
The best Rocket League player in the world was in the finals and was wrecking everyone in his path, almost pulled an amazing come from behind win, and it took a last second skilled-as-fuck team play to beat him in the end. I don't think luck is a huge game changer in Rocket League.
Again I said 1v1 in this case. Teams often side step these issues such as tipoff stuff.
Take a wet bar of soap and sandwich it with your fists. Tell me what happens.LOL uhh sure dude, people man to smash into the ball as everyone else does and have it bounce of the ceiling and in.
Edit- also videogame physics are fare from perfect.
Just watching kronovi vs. Gibbs and I could be wrong, but a ton of points come off of tip off luck with the way the ball bounces or collisions leading to bizarre launches that somehow find the net.
Edit- these are supposedly the 2 best in the world. In quake 3 or cs go you dont have circumstances like that. Again could be over thinking it, but some of the bounces simply make no sense.
Take a wet bar of soap and sandwich it with your fists. Tell me what happens.
They're rigidly defined (barring any glitches).
Here's how skill comes into play for that. Don't let simultaneous hits happen in 1v1.
Here's how skill comes into play for that. Don't let simultaneous hits happen in 1v1.
I'm not talking about pool shots I'm saying when you both hit the ball at the same time on say a type off or jump ball the ball does what it wants, again watch kronovi Gibbs it happens a ton.
Yea the game with RNG bullets in the spray pattern doesn't involve any luck circumstances like that looooooooool
That called physics, and there's nothing wrong with it. If two people kick a soccer ball at the same time there's no telling where it's going to go.
Ong I know lol, I've already said its about frequency not its existence, every single thing involves luck in life at least to an extent.
Then what are you even arguing?
Did you not read my post? How often luck plays a factor may turn people away.
The argument is that this doesn't happen in real sports? Real sports have these kinds of collisions. The only difference is that a soccer ball colliding with the roof removes it from play. The same goes for hockey.K which channel can I find the world championship of soap squeezing? You've missed the point again.
Umm it does in lower tiers, but the higher tier players control those spray pattern which are consistent. It also doesn't play a factor as often as what I'm referring to.
Well we've already concluded that it isn't luck, just the nature of physics. And no. If anything is going to turn people away it won't be that the opening play is difficult to control because two of the best players in the world are going after the ball at the same time. Just as the tip off in basketball doesn't stop people from enjoying that game, and multiple people going after the same ball in soccer doesn't stop it from being the most popular sport in the world.
You're argument just doesn't make any sense.
Annnnddd case closed.
The argument is that this doesn't happen in real sports? Real sports have these kinds of collisions. The only difference is that a soccer ball colliding with the roof removes it from play. The same goes for hockey.
Of course Kronovi is in the finals. Of course!
If it happened frequently in those games, they would be played differently. Rocket League players don't have to smash into each other like mountain goats.No it isn't! Lol. its the frequency and how much it affects the game. In the NBA a blocked shot doesn't ricochet in, same with the NHL. Could it happen or has it? Yes/maybe, but it doesn't happen often enough. If it happened multiple times per hockey game I can guarantee you that would turn people away.
Edit-and again you're focusing on team sports where I'm more focused on the 1v1 aspect.