• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Royalty Falling in Love with a Commoner?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Princess Diana...

The Spencer family is one of Britain's most well-known aristocratic families. Over time, several family members were made knights, baronets and peers. Hereditary titles held by the Spencers include the dukedom of Marlborough (since 1733), and the earldoms of Sunderland (since 1643) and Spencer (since 1765). Two prominent members of the family were Sir Winston Churchill (1874–1965) and Diana, Princess of Wales (1961–1997).

.
 
This is perfectly what you want!


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary,_Crown_Princess_of_Denmark

Mary, Crown Princess of Denmark, Countess of Monpezat, RE (Mary Elizabeth; née Donaldson; born 5 February 1972 in Hobart, Australia) is the wife of Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark. Frederik is the heir apparent to the throne of Denmark, which means that at the time Frederik inherits the throne, Mary will automatically become Queen consort of Denmark.

The couple met at the Slip Inn, a pub in Sydney, when the prince was visiting Australia during the 2000 Summer Olympics. Their official engagement in 2003 and their marriage the following year were the subject of extensive attention from Australian and European news media, which portrayed the marriage as a modern "fairytale" romance between a prince and a commoner
 
Do people still believe "royal" blood is somehow better than that of anyone else?

People believe celebrity blood is even better than anyone else. You're seriously underestimating people's ability to make an idol out of people possessing fame, money or power.
 
Leopold II, the guy who killed/maimed millions of congo natives through slave labor and extermination, married his favorite prostitute in secret.

I dont think it ever really comes out so glamorous in real life.
 
I was watching a shitty movie the other day, and I was thinking about the trope of a prince or princess falling in love with a commoner, but being unable to marry them due to their station in life.

I'm assuming there is no historical precedence for this? No case this is based off of? It comes up SOOOO much, I'd be curious to read a paper on it's origins or something in-depth.

EDIT: To be specific, the question is: Are there examples of this happening historically (say, before the 1800s) and if not, has anyone done any interesting writing on the birth of this trope and it's prevalence? And is it present in all cultures with a history of monarchy?

It's because when Europe lived under the feudal system, noble marriages were more like business contracts rather than for love.

As a noble woman, that was how you move up in society, by marrying a man of higher status.

Little girls were litteraly raised with the goal of marrying into power/wealth, and royalty, or more specifically a crown prince, was the ultimate conquest.
 
Most people are too stupid and brainwashed to be open about falling in love. I mean, most people would never bring someone of a different race back home to their parents... imagine how it is with class?
 
I was thinking just the other day, Japan doesn't have an Empire and never really did except for a short few years in WW2. Why then do they use Imperial nomenclature for their monarchy?

It's just how it's commonly translated in English. The Japanese word for Emperor in the Imperial sense is different from the word they use for the Japanese Emperor.
 
Commoner= no royal blood in this context, I think?

There's a specific definition of commoner in the UK. Any person not holding a title in the british peerage, or other "noble" title. Anyone with such a title was historically disqualified from taking a seat in the house of commons. In more modern times only those with actual seats in the Lords are disqualified from the commons.
 
article400_kate-middleton-420x0.jpg

disgusting. Look at the hoi polloi emanating from her every giant pore. Like the bastard get of a coal miner and a charnel sweep.
 
Gotta give the poor something to dream about, it's just another thing to add to that list. Like winning the lottery, winning x factor, or making a tiny investment that years down the line becomes huge (bitcoins, apple, microsoft, facebook etc). You could argue beliefs of an afterlife in paradise too.
 
...Why the hell would they want to reestablish such an outdated concept?...
Um well it was quite a complicated situation that the current king played masterfully to end the military dictatorship of Franco. You should read up on it, it's really quite interesting.
 
In 1464, King Edward IV married a commoner widow five years his senior, and nobody seemed to care. Although he was never king, Prince John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, married his mistress Katherine Swynford, with whom he had already had four bastard children. Swynford was a commoner, and the sister-in-law of Geoffrey Chaucer.

Elsewhere, every Ottoman Emperor's wives would have mostly been common, and several Sultans formally married women of peasant birth. Suleiman the Magnificent formally married a Ukrainian peasant girl, and their story had an extended relevance in European pop culture.
 
Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden married her gym instructor and her brother is dating a former glamour model...
 
There's a long, long list of Chinese empresses, at least one of them is a commoner by the way we would probably define it (not the daughter of an official/noble/wealthy family?). However, there's a lot of missing history so it's hard to tell for those who don't have a clear background. There is also the question of whether or not the emperors actually loved their empresses or married them out of filial obligations or for the empress's family's power.
 
Isn't her family really wealthy anyway? I mean, obviously that's incomparable to the wealth of the royal family, but it's hardly like he married an actual commoner from a working class background.

A "commoner" is just a person who doesn't come from a landed background or isn't a priest. In the 12th century, Kate Middleton would have had a lot more influence than a farm worker, but shares the same broad social category because her father isn't an earl or baron.
 
I'd say that in modern monarchies/aristocracies it has become more the norm than the exception : UK, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Monaco, Italian families... nobles having to marry their peers seems to be a thing of the past.
 
Ahh fair point. I'm sure there are plenty of real life historical precedent though, but they ended up in gossip circle rather than historical notes. I can think of China where some parents sent their daughters to selection exams in hope she get selected as emperor's concubine. Yang Guifei was a famous (not so)rag to rich love tragedy story.

Wu Zetian was born a commoner, became emperor's concubine. Emperor's heir fell in love with her. She later married the emperor's heir, took power after his death, became the only empress in China.

Yeah, not unheard of in China. Empress He of the Han Dynasty came from a family of butchers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom