• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

RUMOR: Sony chooses Imagination Technologies for the PS4

Lagspike_exe said:
DF speculated that the next DS is going to use nVidia Tegra, while the PSP2 should use PowerVR series 5 GPU. If this is true, the PS4 would use its successor, the 6th series.

What type of graphics/possibilities could the next nintendo handheld deliver using the nvidia processor.

Seeing the cost of the PS3 with its initial release, I guess I better start three savings accounts, one for the PS4, one for the next PSP, and one for games for both platforms for launch. :)
 
Lord Error said:
:lol All other news on that site are Sega related. Chances that this guy is some delusional Sega fan making stuff up, seem pretty high now.

Yeah, this is the vibe coming off the B3D thread too...
 
Taurus said:
Dun dun duuuuuuun. This gen going to be a 6 year cycle? Color me
not
surprised!

I thought they have always said that the PS3 will have a 10 year lifespan, not that it will be ten years before the next generation arrives.
 
Cheeto said:
not really, as gofreak has pointed out

So your telling me if this is true all the stuff we've purchased on the PSN isn't going to be compatible with the PS4 ?

If this is confirmed I'm becoming the biggest 360 fanboy on this board !!!
 
Assuming this is true... is this a good move? I mean, they only have been making mobile chips for ages.

And if this ends up as accessible as the Cell... yeah, devs would love that. Multiplat never so easy? :lol
 
The PlayStation 4 shall use a high end variant of the Series 6 line. Performance, specifications and features are at this time unknown. The Series 6 shall receive an official announcement from IMGTEC sometime in 2010, with initial models targeting the smartphone and netbook sector.

do they make radically different specced ones for phones/netbooks and higher end cards all in the same line?

cos ps4=2010 smartphone doesnt sound too hot
 
4u9ogj.jpg

"We're on it!"
or "Still shitty"?
 
For reference, fgnonline has previously reported on Sega's return to the console business. They then announced Sega's 'change of mind' when their story didn't pan out.
 
2012 sounds about right, but I'm not sure about anything else in the OP

I mean, essentially Dreamcast 2 tech? Really?
 
panda21 said:
do they make radically different specced ones for phones/netbooks and higher end cards all in the same line?

cos ps4=2010 smartphone doesnt sound too hot

I'm not completely familiar with this territory, but it seems to me that there's always a section of people out there who keep expecting and hoping powervr's 'next' gpu to be the next big hotness.

Tying that next gpu to a next-gen console via rumours is one way to fuel that hope...
 
Tkawsome said:
I thought they have always said that the PS3 will have a 10 year lifespan, not that it will be ten years before the next generation arrives.

I think 10 year, if we look at the PS2, essentially means having a system that is still supported with new software titles concurrently during the beginning to mid life cycle of the predecessor.
 
Ranger X said:
The Dreamcast was an impressive leap forward?

http://www.clker.com/cliparts/1/f/d/f/1216180305979727581laurent_panda_point_d_interrogation.svg.hi.png[IMG][/QUOTE]


really? you don’t think the DC blew the fucking doors off the PSX and N64? It was an incredible graphical jump and it took around 2 years till the PS2 came out to match it.
 
LCfiner said:
really? you don’t think the DC blew the fucking doors off the PSX and N64? It was an incredible graphical jump and it took around 2 years till the PS2 came out to match it.

With worse AntiAliasing (aka none) to boot.
 
panda21 said:
do they make radically different specced ones for phones/netbooks and higher end cards all in the same line?

cos ps4=2010 smartphone doesnt sound too hot

This. Sony cannot be seriously thinking of releasing an underpowered PS4 in the wake of MS's next box. We all know Nintendo will deliver modest power, MS will go for the strongest ATI card available at the time, and Sony will....?
 
lowrider007 said:
So your telling me if this is true all the stuff we've purchased on the PSN isn't going to be compatible with the PS4 ?

If this is confirmed I'm becoming the biggest 360 fanboy on this board !!!

What the hell? gofreak shot this down already, and it was pointed out in the post your'e quoting.

thuway said:
This. Sony cannot be seriously thinking of releasing an underpowered PS4 in the wake of MS's next box. We all know Nintendo will deliver modest power, MS will go for the strongest ATI card available at the time, and Sony will....?

No way. Nobody is going to do that next-gen, or any gen after that.
 
obonicus said:
For reference, fgnonline has previously reported on Sega's return to the console business. They then announced Sega's 'change of mind' when their story didn't pan out.
Yep.

The sooner everyone ignores this site, the sooner Mr. Zachary Morris can go back to more honorable means of employment (e.g. taking it up the pooper in a dumpster).
 
thuway said:
This. Sony cannot be seriously thinking of releasing an underpowered PS4 in the wake of MS's next box. We all know Nintendo will deliver modest power, MS will go for the strongest ATI card available at the time, and Sony will....?

yeah. sony seem to like the idea of the bleeding edge of technology, so i'd naturally assume thats what their next console would be like.
 
We are going to get recession boxes. I am fully prepared for small, just enough cpu/gpu and ram tweeks and that is it. This next generation will be a step forward not a leap.
 
V_Ben said:
yeah. sony seem to like the idea of the bleeding edge of technology, so i'd naturally assume thats what their next console would be like.

Its what we've all come to expect from the company. Anything less and its not a Playstation, but a stop-gap.
 
NinjaFusion said:
yes... sure they'll keep the exotic cpu... makes perfect sense.

they sure dug themselves a pit this gen.

the exotic CPU wouldn't have been nearly as difficult if they didnt pick a substandard GPU... the base of the Cell is basically the same chip as whats in the 360 (if not exactly, but without the extra cores)... the issue came into trying to squeeze out performance and make up for an old GPU
 
thuway said:
In terms of raw polys and all those other buzz words, what does this mean for next-gen graphics in our PS4s?

PS4 flips for flops.

Seriously, I have no clue. The Powerzvr architectures are mysteries to me. *Pages Brain_Stew
 
Anerythristic said:
We are going to get recession boxes. I am fully prepared for small, just enough cpu/gpu and ram tweeks and that is it. This next generation will be a step forward not a leap.
No fucking waaaaaaaaaaaay. If thats the case, count me out of next-gen.
 
Chrono said:
What the hell? gofreak shot this down already, and it was pointed out in the post your'e quoting.

ok np I must of read that wrong, 360 fanboy conversion process halted, PS3 fanboy programme re-initiated and engaged.

Nothing to see here :-p
 
gcubed said:
the exotic CPU wouldn't have been nearly as difficult if they didnt pick a substandard GPU... the base of the Cell is basically the same chip as whats in the 360 (if not exactly, but without the extra cores)... the issue came into trying to squeeze out performance and make up for an old GPU

Exactly, the GPU in the PS3 is what dragging it down. I wonder what the PS3 would have been able to do if they had a 360 GPU in it instead of the RSX. Cell has shown us that if you "shine that shit up" it can do some amazing things.
 
Well it needs to be more powerful than the PS3, that way my school can continue to have a Playstation processing core for some of our bioinformatics :P

But anyway, 2010 will be interesting!
 
gcubed said:
the exotic CPU wouldn't have been nearly as difficult if they didnt pick a substandard GPU... the base of the Cell is basically the same chip as whats in the 360 (if not exactly, but without the extra cores)... the issue came into trying to squeeze out performance and make up for an old GPU



either way my point was that their upgrade path seems pretty much strewn with pitfalls.


whereas ms seems to be sticking with the same vendors... with to a layman seems like it poses less issues.
 
NinjaFusion said:
either way my point was that their upgrade path seems pretty much strewn with pitfalls.


whereas ms seems to be sticking with the same vendors... with to a layman seems like it poses less issues.

They are just changing graphic vendors. More than likely, they will go with Cell 2 (whatever that will be), 4 gigs of ram (ram is way too cheap these days), a bluray drive, and XXXXX Graphic card.
 
NinjaFusion said:
either way my point was that their upgrade path seems pretty much strewn with pitfalls.


whereas ms seems to be sticking with the same vendors... with to a layman seems like it poses less issues.

they are kinda locked in to the Cell if they really want BC. I'm sure most if not all PSN games would be more or less compatible with a PowerPC-based chip as I believe there are only a select few that utilize the SPE's to any extent.

As far as the next Cell, i think they made a pretty big leap in FP performance vs whats out in the existing PS3, and most likely the biggest changes would be the core processor would have more cores accompanied by possibly more SPE's
 
thuway said:
Does anyone have the roadmap on what Cell 2 is supposed to be? Surely Cell 2 cannot be that expensive?
It's supposed to have 4 main cores (as opposed to the PS3's 1) and 32 SPUs (as opposed to the PS3's 8):

jq12iq.png
 
El-Suave said:
4u9ogj.jpg

"We're on it!"
or "Still shitty"?

They'll probably still hate it. IIRC Gabe hates multithread coding, multicore processors and such modern humbug. Back in HIS day one didn't need more than one core clocked at 66 MHz.
 
thuway said:
No fucking waaaaaaaaaaaay. If thats the case, count me out of next-gen.

This was not a good generation bottom line wise for Sony or MS. If they launch more 500-600 dollar consoles I will know we are heading for another gaming crash.
 
Top Bottom