This is the most confusing thing I've read today.Same reason 3DS has to suffer from Wii U being unable to handle Squirtle and Ivysaur as HD transformations, probably..
Would the game have enough RAM for Ice Climbers if they removed the Fire Emblem character's feet?
This is where we fundamentally disagree. Neither of us will budge, nor need we. We can just nod and move on.
The Gematsu leak called the removal of Lucas, & his moves were given to Ness via his Custom Moves. He's probably gone for good. :-(Pretty sad. I guess we have full-on confirmation that the 3DS version gimped the Wii U version now, huh? I can't help but wish they had just done one giant version on the Wii U rather than hold it back because of the 3DS development... hopefully the Wii U version has enough content of its own so that it feels like its own full game rather than half a Smash like the 3DS version somewhat does.
More than anything I'm a little bummed since this almost certainly means that IC won't come back as DLC. Rest in peace, you wonderful climbers. Rest in peace...Please let at least Lucas come back please please please
I love the Ice Climbers, but I am okay with trading them for handheld Smash. I wouldn't have been opposed to ICs being Wii U exclusive (as long as there was an exclusive for the 3DS too).
Nobody is going to take yur comment seriously when you said earlier in the thread that you didnt care for the ice climbers being cut in the first place, this doesnt put your opinion above everyone elses
I care that when I buy the Wii U game, the character roster won't be catered towards the Wii U's extra power because Sakurai mandates forced roster parity "so 3DS-only owners won't feel cheated."
What's the point of new graphical models if the characters are going to be limited design-wise as well?
I was just playin..MMK pls
3DS owners cause you to get lots of good stuff to make up for it
I love the Ice Climbers, but I am okay with trading them for handheld Smash. I wouldn't have been opposed to ICs being Wii U exclusive (as long as there was an exclusive for the 3DS too).
The Gematsu leak called the removal of Lucas, & his moves were given to Ness via his Custom Moves. He's probably gone for good. :-(
3DS limitations are the reason those wobbling abominations are no longer in the game? *hugs 3DS*
Wolf sucks. -SakuraiOk sure sakurai, what's your excuse for wolf getting cut then?
The game has to load transforming characters in the memory so you can swap them in at any time during the fights. But the HD versions of the characters are too much for the Wii U to handle, hence transforming characters getting split.This is the most confusing thing I've read today.
Sakurai does what Sakurai wants.
Fans want Ridley. Sakurai doesn't. No Ridley.
KI:U has a ton of weapons with one being "owned" by Dark Pit. Dark Pit is a clone with the same weapons as Pit and he only uses his own weapon in his final smash.
This man does not care about what his fans want. I refuse to believe Jigglypuff is more popular than Mewtwo.
Hell, three games after they debuted, Falco and Ganondorf are STILL clones.
3DS users didn't cause this, Sakurai's closed minded thinking did. There is zero legitimate reasons the Wii U version couldn't have its own roster.
I do realise that, yes.You do realize the PS2, widely considered to have one of the best libraries of all time, was the weakest hardware on the market at the time and often held back multi platform games, right?
False dichotomy. I don't think there are any mainstream systems on the market with a genuinely terrible library. All systems have more good games than I have time to play good games so why settle for hardware that actively ruins my experience? Not to mention the fact that weaker systems gimp games, as evidenced by this thread.Would you rather have good hardware with a terrible library or bad hardware with a good library? The ideal answer is both, but 99% of the time that never happens. I just don't understand why someone would think specs are more important than the games.
Oh no my comment's seriousness!!!
The point of my first post is "wow who cares." It's just the Ice Climbers. Sure, there are a few people that played the heck out of them, I'll venture that, but there is no way enough people gave two shits about them to back the kind of outrage their exclusion has garnered. It's being blown wildly out of proportion by people with zero stake in the situation, it's ridiculous.
For people complaining about the existance of the 3DS game think about position Nintendo is in.
The WiiU has sold like absolute crap, whereas there are tens of millions of 3DSes out there and lots more to be purchased. It makes total and complete business sense for them to make a 3DS version along with a WiiU version.
For people complaining about the existance of the 3DS game think about position Nintendo is in.
The WiiU has sold like absolute crap, whereas there are tens of millions of 3DSes out there and lots more to be purchased. It makes total and complete business sense for them to make a 3DS version along with a WiiU version.
Would the game have enough RAM for Ice Climbers if they removed the Fire Emblem character's feet?
The Gematsu leak called the removal of Lucas, & his moves were given to Ness via his Custom Moves. He's probably gone for good. :-(
The game has to load transforming characters in the memory so you can swap them in at any time during the fights. But the HD versions of the characters are too much for the Wii U to handle, hence transforming characters getting split.
And of the Pokemon Trainer's three Pokemon, only Charizard came back. If it weren't for Wii U we'd probably still have the cool starters that aren't protected by The Pokemon Company's bias.
I really don't think an explanation is needed.Now explain why Snake wasn't in.
How in the blue hell did you come to the conclusion that nobody cared for them? ice climbers was in 2 smash games both with 10 million+ sales, and of that that 20 million sales your saying a extremely few of those didnt care for the chaeacters? Nevermind that they're considered top tier in the gamesOh no my comment's seriousness!!!
The point of my first post is "wow who cares." It's just the Ice Climbers. Sure, there are a few people that played the heck out of them, I'll venture that, but there is no way enough people gave two shits about them to back the kind of outrage their exclusion has garnered. It's being blown wildly out of proportion by people with zero stake in the situation, it's ridiculous.
Just out of curiosity, of those of you who are bothered by this, is it more a principle thing, or more that you mained/often played as the Ice Climbers?
Would you rather have good hardware with a terrible library or bad hardware with a good library? The ideal answer is both, but 99% of the time that never happens. I just don't understand why someone would think specs are more important than the games.
How in the blue hell did you come to the conclusion that nobody cared for them? ice climbers was in 2 smash games both with 10 million+ sales, and of that that 20 million sales your saying a extremely few of those didnt care for the chaeacters? Nevermind that they're considered top tier in the games
Oh, look. It's that guy telling other people how they feel.