M°°nblade said:
Their way of attracting more gamers was acceptable for the core audience, Sony didn't introduce a degradation in terms of hardware and software quality.
Why, because their version included lots of people being shot? The
exact same bullshit arguments being levied against the Wii ruining hardcore gaming were used against Sony when they first rose to prominence.
The exact same ones. The difference is, Nintendo took Sony's market expansion tactics - that's 'expansion,' not 'degradation' - and
expanded upon those.
It wasn't acceptable at first for the 'core audience' at all. People whined and complained, even ranted, about Sony displacing Nintendo and Sega back in the day - just as PC gamers did when the console grew in popularity. Do you honestly think any of these arguments to discredit the Wii's success are new or unique? They're not. At all. They're tired and antiquated, and people keep spouting them off as if they've had some divine revelation about the future of the industry when they're simply playing its version of 'Wii Music' - same old song, slightly different rhythm.