AndrewDean84xX
Banned
Where do people work where pouring funds into a project that isn't (for whatever reasons management deems appropriate) meeting milestones/deadlines is thought of as a good idea?
Final Fantasy 15 and the Last Guardian dev teams?
Where do people work where pouring funds into a project that isn't (for whatever reasons management deems appropriate) meeting milestones/deadlines is thought of as a good idea?
Listen, if you (as a team) have creative control, there is no such thing as an intractable problem; worst-case scenario is simply re-designing, omitting, and/or replacing the thing that's holding you up.
For well-organized and experienced teams, its no big deal at all.
UNLESS they are dealing with a publisher who adamantly demands features x, y, and z be implemented despite them being warned that this course of action will be unproductive, unnecessary or actively damaging to the project both in creative and logistical sense.
External producers have a lot of swing, but often in my experience not the creative chops to justify their influence and simply default (out of fear for their own jobs) to a position where they dogmatically defend the publisher's "interests" regardless of the developers warnings about the damage not changing tack is going to incur.
This is all it takes for a project to go to hell. I saw this depressingly often in my time, particularly when a publisher had very specific strategic plans for a project.
Actually, I have heard from my friends at MS that the whole gaming division is under heavy scrutiny. I really wouldn't be surprised to see them drastically cut, and even more I highly expect the "Scorpio" to be delayed - that is a piece of information I have been keeping to myself to keep from being labeled a console warrior... We know there will be a new Forza this year, but everything else is up in the air...
I'd expect some kind of Minecraft clone to "diversify" the third-party lineup if Scorpio actually releases this year.
Meanwhile, MS is sitting on all of Rare's properties which we may never see again. If it won't be a major "success", the game will never see release. So probably never see another Banjo, or Conker, or any number of titles. Instead, they have Rare working on a multiplayer (has to be), pirate simulator. Pray Sea of Thieves is a success, or Rare will be next studio canned.
"Fine"
![]()
Hey, he's not a MLG player; he's fine.
Bethesda did the same to Human head.
How is releasing a bad game for $60 good for anyone?
That's what I'm wondering.
So looking back, at Gamescom 2015 they announced a release window of holiday 2016.
Then just 4 months later in January 2016 they pushed it back to "2017"
Game was in trouble for a while.
I doubt it. Nintendo seems to have pretty realistic expectations when it comes to projects like these. I expect they'll partner with Platinum again in the future.
Yup. I'm glad Sony chose to keep funding and release The Order 1886 because I ended up enjoying it.Who's deciding what is good or bad?
Taste aren't universal.
That would make sense if Microsoft had a bevy of other projects on at the moment but they don't seem to have any. They need to seriously impress at E3 this year for their 2017 lineup to be considered big enough to justify a cancellation like this.
"Phil Spencer ‏@XboxP3
@TiC_Podcast Difficult decision, we believe result is better 4 Xbox gamers, still disappointing. Im confident in 17 lineup thats our focus"
MS owns the IP. This is dead and buried.
Phil I promise you it is absolutely not better 4 Xbox gamers.
Phantom Dust
Sea of Thieves
State of Decay 2
Crackdown 3
Halo Wars 2
They have five exclusives coming up in 2017 at this moment, FIVE.
I'm not counting small downloadable titles here, but still, you get the point.
I had really hoped for more since the phil spencer era started.
Sure, but not on a project of the scale of Scalebound.
Who is next up on Microsoft's death row?
Crackdown 3 or Sea of thieves?
Is that picture floating around (about MS supposedly withholding payment) legit? Seems like quite the "bomb" to drop just out fo the blue. And we all know how the internet loves its dramas, real or otherwise.
Yup. I'm glad Sony chose to keep funding and release The Order 1886 because I ended up enjoying it.
And Knack is one of my favorite games of the generation.
Not joking.
True. And I'm just playing Devil's Advocate here, but if Microsoft is willing to throw away four years of funding for a project such as this, then they probably thought it wasn't worth continuing of salvaging.
Not necessarily true.
However, contracts take two parties to agree so I cant see how one side can "do dodgy stuff" without the other having signed up to it at some point.
Who's deciding what is good or bad?
Taste aren't universal.
Nothing of value was lost today.
How is releasing a bad game for $60 good for anyone?
That's what I'm wondering.
Hate to say it, but Xbox seems like the kind of thing that Microsoft would can in a heartbeat without even flinching. I think the only reason it hasn't been cancelled already is because it's such a high-profile product and would reflect poorly on the company.
Between having a Kamiya game and not having a Kamiya game, you always go with the first.
I posted this earlier in this thread:
Anyway, isn't it the side of speculation to provide evidence?
Unfortunately, we are unable to comment or say at this time, Inaba told IGN at TGS when asked if the game has multiplayer aspects.
Doesn't work like that.If there's any company who is broke and struggling to keep afloat, it's Microsoft.
2017 games.What are these 17 games Spencer is talking about?
Sea of Thieves
Halo 6
Halo Wars 1 Remake
Halo Wars 2
Forza 7
Forza Horizon 4
Gears of War 5
Blehhh. Better be some megatons.
Maybe they cancelled it because it was going to be a trainwreck? They would rather cancel than release a bad game? Maybe it was going to keep costing time and money but the result wasn't viable for the investment?
That's the angle that makes the most sense as of now.
What are these 17 games Spencer is talking about?
Sea of Thieves
Halo 6
Halo Wars 1 Remake
Halo Wars 2
Forza 7
Forza Horizon 4
Gears of War 5
Blehhh. Better be some megatons.
This is partly hindsight bias but Scalebound just seemed like an ill conceived idea. Who was the audience?
What are these 17 games Spencer is talking about?
Sea of Thieves
Halo 6
Halo Wars 1 Remake
Halo Wars 2
Forza 7
Forza Horizon 4
Gears of War 5
Blehhh. Better be some megatons.
I doubt it. Nintendo seems to have pretty realistic expectations when it comes to projects like these. I expect they'll partner with Platinum again in the future.
The money will be going to more halo and forza. Isn't that enough?!
Well yeah, if Nintendo had decided to fund the game, it wouldn't have become nearly as large as this project became.
That would make sense if Microsoft had a bevy of other projects on at the moment but they don't seem to have any. They need to seriously impress at E3 this year for their 2017 lineup to be considered big enough to justify a cancellation like this.
EDIT: And as Monkey says above, it's not like Microsoft is hurting at all.