Okay guys... You're on to me. I'm going to come clean.
I want all your foreskins. That's my motive.
Edit. Really though. I think the circumcision argument should come down to one thing. Science. Any other reasons for it are bullshit. If science didn't support it, I'd be 100% against it.
Science is now a single entity?
What I don't get it, what scientific evidence was cited in defence of circumcision before that study came we out? Was there any?Science consists of whichever studies support what Bulbo already agrees with. No confirmation bias here!
So it's okay to traumatically cut a baby's penis, something which he cant change for life, but its not okay if the doctor sucks the blood?
So it's okay to traumatically cut a baby's penis, something which he cant change for life, but its not okay if the doctor sucks the blood?
I am circumcised myself, and I'd rather not have been. I bear no ill will to my parents for that decision.What if when the baby grows up, he wishes that his genitals had not been permanently optionally surgically altered at a young age?
Did I show up before or after the sketchy studies done in Africa that will be posted to defend circumcision?
I remember some story about a priest who tricked women into believing that his seed is holy or some shit like that.catholics take note: if blowing baby dicks is a sacred rite in your religion, then it isn't really child molestation
Maybe I'm being simple..
But wouldn't it just make more sense for circumcision to be a procedure that only an informed adult can consent to being done upon themselves?
Wait until the child is eighteen, inform them of all the risks that non-essential surgery entails, and allow them to make an informed and considered choice - as an adult - regarding permanently surgically altering themselves.
That makes sense, right? Everyone who wants to get circumcised, gets circumcised. It would introduce the added benefit of preventing crimes like this happening, right?
Can someone please explain why this doesn't count as sexual abuse?
Absolutely!
But all circumcision defenders basically say they wouldn't want it done if they hit 16/18.
So basically its a nod to assault the child and force something on them.
For reasons unknown.
But am pretty sure your logic was what Germany tried to do.
I am Jewish (reform) and my nephew was circumcised last Sunday at his bris. The moel was an actual doctor and used hospital grade medical equipment at my sister's house. Before you jump to ANY conclusions about circumsision in general (and it as a Jewish ritual) please keep in mind the story posted in this thread is from the ULTRA ORTHODOX that are essentially living in the Stone Age. Do not associate these types of Jews with the vast majority that practice circumsisum --- it may as well be two different religions.
Sorry but anyone practicing any form of circumsion without informed consent of the victim is living in the stone age
Circumcision is awesome but this is just unsafe technique. Horrible.
Ahhhhhh no. I was circumcised when I was only a few days old. I'm sure it hurt, but frankly, I can't remember anything from when I was that young, so it doesn't matter to me one bit. I really don't get this anti-circumsicion stuff. Almost all of my friends, jewish or not, are circumcised, and none of them care at all about any ethical implications of cutting off piece a newborns dick. I would never be circumcised as an adult, however, because I would be aware of what was happening. I didn't give a shit as a baby.
wow alot of anti semitism in this thread