Last name.salva said:Slaughter as a name? wtf
Last name.salva said:Slaughter as a name? wtf
Honestly, saying "Separate checks, please" at the beginning is way more logical than an IT infrastructure. And that would resolve the problem.Slavik81 said:That's true, nevertheless, I think they should address the customers' complaints, as they'd be reasonably resolved with decent IT infrastructure. The customer shouldn't need to compensate for the restaurant's shortcomings.
Though, obviously these particular customers have acted in a seriously inappropriate manner and should face jail time for assault.
Slavik81 said:That's true, nevertheless, I think they should address the customers' complaints, as they'd be reasonably resolved with decent IT infrastructure. The customer shouldn't need to compensate for the restaurant's shortcomings.
Though, obviously these particular customers have acted in a seriously inappropriate manner and should face jail time for assault.
dojokun said:Telling the waitress to split checks ahead of time means:
Items get added to cards individually. Checks come quickly and the waitress does not need to spend time figuring out who got what.
Waiting until afterwards to tell the waitress to split the check means:
Waitress has to spend time going back to see who had what items. Other orders are not given to cooks right away. Food that has been cooked is sitting there not getting delivered as soon as it could. For some dishes such as rare steaks, this could mean an extra few minutes on the warmer, which could mean the customer gets a medium-rare steak instead of rare, which means having to put in another order for a rare steak. Other tables will be waiting for checks longer as well.
Since not every restaurant has the same software and isn't running their staff the same ay, it's much more simple and logical, the customers can specify they want separate checks at the beginning.Aselith said:The waitress should box off the orders by person and worry about the total when she knows how the payment will be made. As long as she keeps the orders seperate she'll only have to add the orders once whether it's together or seperate. That's what her fucking notepad is for. Notes.
I've never asked for an individual check because waitresses in my area always ask whether it's together or seperate at the end of the meal and the check always come quickly. I'm assuming that's because eateries in my area aren't staffed by retarded people.
Then just make them pay for the meal when they order it.mac said:I still feel that if you are going to a restaurant you have to play your part as the customer. A 12 dollar order of Orange Chicken doesn't give you the right to bypass standards of politeness.
People would never ask their plumber to clean the windows or a gardener to paint the patio as part of their jobs. But in a restaurant people become entitled brats. When some people are given the tiniest bit of authority and shown deference they suddenly think they are royalty.
Does alerting the server you want to split checks save time and is it helpful to the server? Well then, do them a favor. Behave as a guest.
Specify at the beginning you want separate checks. It's not hard.Slavik81 said:Then just make them pay for the meal when they order it.
Or ask them if they want it split.
It's not that hard.
Aselith said:The waitress should box off the orders by person and worry about the total when she knows how the payment will be made. As long as she keeps the orders seperate she'll only have to add the orders once whether it's together or seperate. That's what her fucking notepad is for. Notes.
Slavik81 said:Then just make them pay for the meal when they order it.
Or ask them if they want it split.
It's not that hard.
Ok. Well, I don't need to debate this with you.dojokun said:Specify at the beginning you want separate checks. It's not hard.
How you want your check split is often not on the mind of customers at the beginning of the restaurant experience and interaction flow.dojokun said:Specify at the beginning you want separate checks. It's not hard.
dojokun said:Since not every restaurant has the same software and isn't running their staff the same ay, it's much more simple and logical, the customers can specify they want separate checks at the beginning.
mac said:What you don't understand is they have more than one order a day. A server is juggling several orders, several tables, and usually dealing with assholes. Any addition, like asking for lemon after getting tea is just one request from you, but it creates a cascade scenario for everything else the server must do. It's like showing up 10 minutes late for a doctors appointment and being turned away. The doctor certainly could see you but that 10 minutes eats into the next person and throughout the day until someone who showed up on time can not be seen.
Right. This is a very human problem that can't be solved easily. So the best way to approach it would be for restaurants to figure out a way to easily separate checks at the end.mac said:It is considered rude on the part of the server to address the subject of payment before the customer is finished and ready to pay. It makes it look like they are trying to get you to leave. Etiquette, manners, politeness, lets all use these a little more in restaurants.
Everythin you typed could be repaced with "Separate chcks pleas" before the meal.Aselith said:Why is that more logical? You have to divide it up at some point anyways so why not keep it all separate through the use of a simple line between, that way you save yourself a hassle if they change their mind during the meal? If you calculate it during the meal, you'd have to calculate again every time someone orders something else. It should be calculated after the meal so knowing separate or together doesn't do shit for you at the beginning. Just keep it all divided and save yourself the headache (and the ass whooping.)
What are you talking about?
Slavik81 said:Ok. Well, I don't need to debate this with you.
The free market exists for this precise reason. Restaurants that best serve their customers will proper.
dojokun said:Everythin you typed could be repaced with "Separate chcks pleas" before the meal.
Juanadams said:I use to work at Olive Garden and our computer system made it really easy to keep every person at a table separated and then at the end will let you either print them all separate, all together, or any combination that is needed.
I assume most modern restaurants have systems like this, but I'm sure there are plenty without it.
Wow, problem solved much? So much arguing over nothing.Juanadams said:I use to work at Olive Garden and our computer system made it really easy to keep every person at a table separated and then at the end will let you either print them all separate, all together, or any combination that is needed.
I assume most modern restaurants have systems like this, but I'm sure there are plenty without it.
Juanadams said:I use to work at Olive Garden and our computer system made it really easy to keep every person at a table separated and then at the end will let you either print them all separate, all together, or any combination that is needed.
I assume most modern restaurants have systems like this, but I'm sure there are plenty without it.
Treating you customers right doesn't man they have to act so spoiled that they think saying "Separate checks please" beforehand is more trouble than trying to predict who will want separate chcks and who won't.Slavik81 said:Ok. Well, I don't need to debate this with you.
The free market exists for this precise reason. Restaurants that best serve their customers will proper.
Separate chcks from the start dosn't mean you've already added it up. It means separate lists of orders as they go, which not every customer wants.Aselith said:Except the part where people will change their mind and where people will order extra stuff later in the meal but you already added up the meal so you have a hissy fit everytime someone orders a new item because you already figured it up like a chump to "save time."
You don't have to predict. It's 2011, we have the technology to handle it.dojokun said:Treating you customers right doesn't man they have to act so spoiled that they think saying "Separate checks please" beforehand is more trouble than trying to predict who will want separate chcks and who won't.
dojokun said:Separate chcks from the start dosn't mean you've already added it up. It means separate lists of orders as they go, which not every customer wants.
Even easier to say this at the beginning, "Separate checks, please."Srsly said:As said, it's easy to put a mark or draw a line for separate people, then you can link the orders that are paying together at the end.
dojokun said:Even easier to say this at the beginning, "Separate checks, please."
dojokun said:Separate chcks from the start dosn't mean you've already added it up. It means separate lists of orders as they go, which not every customer wants.
Not every restaurant as the same tech, nor can every restaurant owner afford it. If restauant profit margins were like Wall Street executive pay, we wouldn't see so many restaurants go under.Korey said:You don't have to predict. It's 2011, we have the technology to handle it.
Nope. I never agreed that it's easy to put them together. Like I said, not every restaurant has the same tech.Aselith said:So, the exact same shit I was talking about except you don't need to ask because it's easy to put them together when they're already seperated? Ok then thanks for agreeing with me.
dojokun said:Nope. I never agreed that it's easy to put them together. Like I said, not every restaurant has the same tech.
So no, I didn't agree with you.
I expect that many restaurants can already handle this effortlessly. The customer expecting that you are competent is not being 'spoiled'.dojokun said:Treating you customers right doesn't man they have to act so spoiled that they think saying "Separate checks please" beforehand is more trouble than trying to predict who will want separate chcks and who won't.
dojokun said:Not every restaurant as the same tech, nor can every restaurant owner afford it. If restauant profit margins were like Wall Street executive pay, we wouldn't see so many restaurants go under.
dojokun said:Nope. I never agreed that it's easy to put them together. Like I said, not every restaurant has the same tech.
So no, I didn't agree with you.
dojokun said:Treating you customers right doesn't man they have to act so spoiled that they think saying "Separate checks please" beforehand is more trouble than trying to predict who will want separate chcks and who won't.
1) It's easy to say "Separate checks plase" at the beginning if the customers aren't complete morons.Srsly said:Except it is easy to put them together if the server isn't a complete moron
If they wanted the checks together, there is no additional work as that is how it is by default.Aselith said:You have to put them together regardless. Do you think you don't have to add the order up if the person says "together please!"
dojokun said:1) It's easy to say "Separate checks plase" at the beginning if the customers aren't complete morons.
2) Not every restaurant has the same tech, so any time spent on something that could have been avoided means food waiting to be delivered, cooks waiting to receive orders, and other tables waiting to get checks.
That would mean other things get delayed by one minute. One more minute of a rare steak sitting on the warmer means the customer might not be satisfied with his steak and could send it back.DR2K said:While the waitress didn't deserve to get her ass kicked, she should have just done her job and split the checks. Would have taken less than a minute and made the people tipping you happy.
Why would you take that out on the server? What control would they have over the POS software the establishment uses?Srsly said:BTW, I would leave a big fat zero as a tip if a server told me they couldn't split an order and I was the one who ended up paying.
dojokun said:If they wanted the checks together, there is no additional work as that is how it is by default.
GoldenEye 007 said:Why would you take that out on the server? What control would they have over the POS software the establishment uses?
Deciding all of that before heading in would result in not causing other tables to possibly have to wait longer to put in orders, get their food, or get their checks.Srsly said:Many parties don't decide who is going to pay for what until towards the end of the meal, for good reason. People don't know what they're going to order until they look at the menu, so cost per person may be variable. Someone might have a price range in mind they want to cover, but not know who to cover until after everyone's ordered, then they have to let the other party members know. Often times, someone in a party will suddenly feel generous and decide to pay for another person's meal. There are lots of variables involved and they easiest way to account for them is to have the capacity to easily split an order at the end, once everyone has decided what and who they're willing to pay for.
dojokun said:Deciding all of that before heading in would result in not causing other tables to possibly have to wait longer to put in orders, get their food, or get their checks.
If that was true, no waitress would ever care if you specify before or afterwards. Ask yourself why the waitress in this story told them it would be good to let her know ahead of time.Aselith said:Well, she's still got to do the extra work if she finds out before OR after the meal unless your system is so ass backwards that it can't see the front in which case she should realize it's totally FUBAR and ASK before she takes the order. Either it lets you seperate checks or it doesn't, either way she'll still have to do the work.
Count of Monte Sawed-Off said:I used to work at a job where we interacted with a lot of US military personnel and had to address them by rank. In my 4 months at the job I came across 2 Sgt. Slaughters. Awesome stuff.
It's not complicated remembering hundreds of unique orders a day for at least an hour apiece when the vast majority of time it isn't relevant to do so after the initial service?Srsly said:They should be able to quickly note who ordered what. This stuff isn't complicated
dojokun said:That would mean other things get delayed by one minute. One more minute of a rare steak sitting on the warmer means the customer might not be satisfied with his steak and could send it back.
Acerac said:It's not complicated remembering hundreds of unique orders a day for at least an hour apiece when the vast majority of time it isn't relevant to do so after the initial service?
OK I guess.
dojokun said:Specify at the beginning you want separate checks. It's not hard.