Yes it should be shrunk down. I've read many articles about how well students would do. There would be more days added to winter and spring break to make up for it.
If I recall correctly, students in South Korea were ranked top in the world in scores. Even though they go to school year round, they actually attend school less in hours per year. More free time!
I became the very best, like no one ever was, bro.And I'm sure that benefited you greatly.
Imo, that would be worse. Students would still forget stuff and be less productive with the added downside of morale being low thanks to having to go to school year round.Obviously Pokemon Silver would be unplayable during the many other breaks children would get to replace summer break.
After all it's not like anyone is suggesting that kids go to school any more; just that their breaks are divvied up.
I should really leave the topic. Debates where the majority doesn't understand the subject of discussion are frustrating.
Summer camps and sports programs wouldn't be able to function with only 2 week breaks. They are great programs for kids that require the 2+ months of summer break.Having 2 weeks off every two months is different than having all summer off and no breaks. It's more consistent time off which lets kids unwind more frequently and gives them more opportunities to catch up if they fall behind. It's not here and there, it's incredibly frequent and only not a possibility because all that time off is being used in one chunk.
The way people were reacting reminded me of the way my fellow students reacted in grade school when we had this debate. They weren't thinking then, and looking at many of the people who responded they weren't thinking now. Sorry about the caps, it was just easier than quoting the numerous people who obviously didn't understand the issue.
You're right though, the fact that people react this way should clue me in that this is a very emotional debate. Thankfully my poor parody hooked me somebody who looks like they're actually willing to discuss this with reason, eh?
I mean seriously I just had to look at the posts made since I quoted you to find somebody who clearly doesn't understand the concept. People hear that summer vacation would be gotten rid of and they... well... think about it like children.
Oh god another one.
We might not be in the top, but I still don't regret those two extra weeks of my life every year.
Summer camps and sports programs wouldn't be able to function with only 2 week breaks. They are great programs for kids that require the 2+ months of summer break.
Anyway, here's my suggestion as a high school teacher:
4 shorter breaks split up throughout the year. Teachers keep the same students as they go through each grade. Same elementary school teacher for five years, same middle school teachers for three years, same high school teachers for four years. You really only get a good sense of a student once you've been with them for the year. This is my first year working in a school and I already can attest to that.
Do you have any evidence of this? Or are you just speculating? You very well may be right but I don't have any reason to believe that without the large break they'd be forgetting nearly as much, nor do I see any reason they'd be less productive. I'd honestly venture to guess that if summer vacation was never a thing, the transition to it would cause far more morale loss than vice versa.Imo, that would be worse. Students would still forget stuff and be less productive with the added downside of morale being low thanks to having to go to school year round.
Oh, my bad, was somebody suggesting increasing the school year? I thought the OP was about rearranging it and didn't really see anyone suggesting increasing it, though maybe I just missed it.That wasn't aimed at you, it was a post about increasing the school year, not rearranging it.
I would have preferred an extra week off at Christmas as a kid.
Huh. Yeah you have a solid point there that I hadn't considered. Can't dispute that.Summer camps and sports programs wouldn't be able to function with only 2 week breaks. They are great programs for kids that require the 2+ months of summer break.
Some ideas work well on paper, but fall apart in practice. For instance, having the summer months off means that teachers need to spend less of the year fighting their students to stay on task when all of them just want to be outside in the warm weather playing.
Did... Did I just win an argument on the internet? Is this real life?Huh. Yeah you have a solid point there that I hadn't considered. Can't dispute that.
The cultural value of summer break is greater than any form of economic benefit it might give.
Do you work in the elementary panel (or are you still going through your preservice training)? Your suggestions relating to teachers following their students wouldn't work at the high school panel for many logistical reasons.
A two to three week break every couple of months would be an infinitely better system. The only downside I see is that teachers wouldn't be able to pick up supplemental income during the summer, but as far as education goes, there aren't really any arguments against it.
*Shrug* I'm not so bullheaded as to think eliminating summer vacation is a flawless idea. I just think the positives outweigh the negatives, and quite frankly yours is the first one that I've seen that I can agree with as reasonable.Did... Did I just win an argument on the internet? Is this real life?
You know, I say let children be children. Give them time to play and grow outside of the schools.
There are a lot of problems with the schools. Extending the school year will not address these problems. It's just throwing more time and more resources after bad results.
It's possible to fix what's wrong with schools and keep summer vacations intact.
You know, I say let children be children. Give them time to play and grow outside of the schools.
There are a lot of problems with the schools. Extending the school year will not address these problems. It's just throwing more time and more resources after bad results.
It's possible to fix what's wrong with schools and keep summer vacations intact.
I will fight you. Ever seen the Recess movie? Yeah.
I remember dat fool in da Recess movie tried da same shit. He ended up in prison.
Should it? Yes. Will it - no.
I think you will find that this debate is essentially the same as the gun debate - anyone who has experience their benefit will never want to give it up and have all sorts of rationalizations why it should be continued.
Everything in here is so kneejerk. Did none of you ever simply get bored by the end of your summer break? Because my whole graduating year complained about the end of it(unless they were on vacation at the time).
Don't increase the number of school days, just shift some of the vacation time to the Spring and Winter breaks. Jesus Christ people, summer break is far from holy and doesn't necessarily mean canceling it all-together. It doesn't have to be three months of letting the thinking prowess of students turn to mush. I was one of the 'smart kids' and I sure as hell know that I felt less intelligent whenever I returned to school after the summer break.
So you're saying people who have experienced something good will fight to stop it from being stolen from others?
Okay, good?
Oh, my bad, was somebody suggesting increasing the school year? I thought the OP was about rearranging it and didn't really see anyone suggesting increasing it, though maybe I just missed it.
I'm in pre-service training at the secondary level. It certainly can work, though I understand it would be much more troubling in science which requires different certifications for different classes. At the very least it should be possible to keep students with the same teachers for two years, or as many of their teachers as they can.
If tracking is an issue, well, students are over-tracked as it is.
Obviously lately American public schools have been lacking in teaching children the skill sets needed to be competitive in the global picture, especially in STEM subjects.
From what I understand the only reason the two and a half month summer break exists, was so kids could help on the family farm back when, well more than 1% of the population produced agriculture.
Would ridding this break be a good idea? I personally don't see a need for it anymore, other than a cultural tradition. Do other countries have this long of a break for no apparent reason?
The only cons to getting rid of the break that I can think of are: more taxpayer money going towards schools (which arguably, is a good thing of course) and a nuisance to kids everywhere. Have there been any realistic bills written in terms of this?
We can also discuss other problems with the American education system here, if desired.
No harm done.No, its my fault I should have quoted the post.
It was to do with politicians pledging to increase the school year.
I just wanted to rage![]()
More instruction time results in better scores. This is a fact. The biggest problem with kid's grades is home lifestyle.
I don't think you are considering the fact that individual students have their own unique timetables and course loads, and that teachers can only cover a limited number of courses.
You never get to know the majority of your students that well at the secondary level anyhow. If you are teaching 75 minute classes, you usually have 70-100 kids a semester. More if you are operating on a 5-6 period schedule. Even if you had them two years in a row, you'll be with the student for all of 200 hours while dividing your attention between them and 25-30 others.
No, its my fault I should have quoted the post.
It was to do with politicians pledging to increase the school year.
I just wanted to rage![]()
For some kids school is an escape from their troubled home lives. This is generally for students in poverty or with terrible family situations. Some of these kids enjoy their time at school more than anything else.
Didn't you enjoy your summer breaks as kid?
My summer breaks were some of the best times of life as a kid. Tons of free to play, go outside, explore nature, go swimming, staying up super late playing video games with cousins, visiting family members in other states.
More vacations means more time to unwind throughout the year with more knowledge retention. This way kids have more time to catch up if they fall behind in classes and those who are ahead can get frequent breaks they deserve.You people terrify me and have no real concept of effective education.
You said yourself that schools are 'lacking in teaching children' and removing the break would be a 'nuisance to kids everywhere', so how about explaining the positives of your idea first?
The fuck are you even talking about?Yup, this. A thousand times.
How about we work on making the school time that's already there actually useful and effective before we start enslaving the children, hm?
It shouldn't be eliminated, but I think you can reduce the time. 3 months is a long time. As a kid, I would usually start to get restless and be ready for school to start back up by the middle of August.
Reduce summer break to 2 months, and add another 3-4 weeks off during the rest of the school year.
What is more class time going to solve if the current system isn't working? More time to stare at walls while thinking about tits and halo?