DaSorcerer7
Member
Momo said:Fuck it, I'm leaving this thread till people calm down/read the crappy conclusions the article jumps to.
feels kinda like a wii u thread ..lol
Momo said:Fuck it, I'm leaving this thread till people calm down/read the crappy conclusions the article jumps to.
Arnie said:This thread is an absolute carnival of stupid.
There's no way the next Xbox is launching in 2015, I'm surprised so many of you are gullibly believing that. Microsoft got where they are because they launched the 360 early, they aren't going to do the polar opposite of that with the next Xbox.
AranhaHunter said:Don't crucify me, but I'm ok with the next XBox and PS4 in 2015. I want a big generation leap, not some better graphics at 1080p.
DennisK4 said:Only Sony can save us now!
I mean Nintendo!...wait, no...PC!
Apple, save us!
Smision said:it's already gonna be a big leap. my old 8800gts + core 2 duo set up was a leap over the 360 and that was a few years ago.
Developers are already complaining about the hardware not being up to date enough for AI
Arnie said:This thread is an absolute carnival of stupid.
There's no way the next Xbox is launching in 2015, I'm surprised so many of you are gullibly believing that. Microsoft got where they are because they launched the 360 early, they aren't going to do the polar opposite of that with the next Xbox.
HL1 AI > HL2 AIStevieP said:The AI in Half-Life is far superior to the AI in Crysis 2. It has little to do with hardware.
And the Halo games have always had great AI. Is it easier to do AI on a PC compared to consoles? Yes. But that's the way it's always going to be so developers should actually put effort into it like Bungie does.StevieP said:Your 8800gts also draws approximately 120w of power. The current top-end GPUs draw triple that.
The AI in Half-Life is far superior to the AI in Crysis 2. It has little to do with hardware.
Makes sense. Sure beats losing money on R&D and new hardware.DaSorcerer7 said:Seriously, with the amount of success Microsoft is enjoying right now, I can totally see riding the kinect wave for as long as they can.
Halo games are extremely balanced. A console's power is limited, so there are a lot of sacrifices made. If you go for good AI, there probably won't be much juice left for pushing the graphics, but graphics is always the first priority for many developers, that's why we see dumb AI in so many console games.Billychu said:And the Halo games have always had great AI. Is it easier to do AI on a PC compared to consoles? Yes. But that's the way it's always going to be so developers should actually put effort into it like Bungie does.
Meisadragon said:Halo games are extremely balanced. A console's power is limited, so there are a lot of sacrifices made. If you go for good AI, there probably won't be much juice left for pushing the graphics, but graphics is always the first priority for many developers, that's why we see dumb AI in so many console games.
But having in in order processor certainly doesn't help.StevieP said:Good AI is far more dependant on programming than hardware power.
StevieP said:Good AI is far more dependant on programming than hardware power.
I did read the article. My post was in reference to how other hadn't read it and there was no stopping this train.Momo said:Fuck it, I'm leaving this thread till people calm down/read the crappy conclusions the article jumps to.
Not necessarily. FEAR and HL1 just used a lot of clever scripting.Meisadragon said:Good AI algorithm will eat CPU cycles, so yes, it is dependent on hardware power.
Billychu said:But having in in order processor certainly doesn't help.
Good AI algorithm will eat CPU cycles, so yes, it is dependent on hardware power.
I know :3purple cobra said:I did read the article. My post was in reference to how other hadn't read it and there was no stopping this train.
That's all that any game "AI" actually is though.SapientWolf said:Not necessarily. FEAR and HL1 just used a lot of clever scripting.
I'm sorry.Momo said:I know :3
It should read "Next Xbox to run a more unified OS along with other MS devices" because this is the only relevant(to Gaming) piece of info from this article.Shouldn't the Thread title be "Site quotes another site inferring Microsoft claim: "Windows 9 in 2015, runs on next Xbox"?
jim-jam bongs said:That's all that any game "AI" actually is though.
StevieP said:It will eat far more man-hours than it will CPU cycles. Hence today's incredibly poor AI across pretty much all games.
SneakyStephan said:Vs fear where you walk into a certain room, you trigger a module that reads what weapon you have then one of the npcs shout a prerecorded message for that weapon for that room trigger.
NPCs who detect that they are within the blast radius of
incoming grenades run away, or crouch and flinch. We
were surprised to find NPCs outside of the blast radius
turning their heads to watch the grenades land. We did not
intentionally implement this behavior. NPCs were trying
to satisfy the EscapeDanger goal, but found the actions
EscapeDanger and ReactToDanger were invalid
due to the distance from the NPC to the grenade. The NPC
found the next best candidate action,
LookAtDisturbance, to set the
DisturbanceExists symbol to false. This action was
intended for NPCs reacting to disturbance sounds, but
worked well as a reaction to distant flying grenades. These
nuances add depth to behavior, and fall out for free when
NPCs formulate their own plans in real-time.
Microsoft is doing great and have excellent marketshare. No need to stomp that out by forcing a new hardware on consumers that have just invested in Kinect.Vinci said:There is no damned way that MS would let Nintendo have two to three years uncontested except possibly by Sony. That would be insane.
RavenFox said:Kinect has to soak in for a while and Microsoft has to do this smart since the darn device is selling. Launching a next gen xbox on top of old kinect hardware will not make sense right now. I have a feeling they will wait awhile before upgrading to the next big thing. Just take a look at what they've done with their dvd's. Their preparing a longer than usual run imo.
Microsoft is doing great and have excellent marketshare. No need to stomp that out by forcing a new hardware on consumers that have just invested in Kinect.
Lees went on to say that Microsoft wants to provide coherence and consistency across different devices, particularly with Xbox, and that the goal isnt just to share UI, but also core technologies like Internet Explorer.
The Wii U seems like Nintendo jumping into this gen rather than NEXT gen (whether that's actually true or not is unknown at this point) so if Microsoft and Sony also think that way and consumer opinions agree, both MS and Sony would be fine letting Nintendo have a couple years, imo.Vinci said:There is no damned way that MS would let Nintendo have two to three years uncontested except possibly by Sony. That would be insane.
Heavy said:The Wii U seems like Nintendo jumping into this gen rather than NEXT gen (whether that's actually true or not is unknown at this point) so if Microsoft and Sony also think that way and consumer opinions agree, both MS and Sony would be fine letting Nintendo have a couple years, imo.
I take it I'm the only one happy about next gen not happening until 2015. This also gives Microsoft and Sony to give more price drops out of their current systems, gives Wii U more time to be in the current gen and is really good for everybody to increase this gen besides from techies.