WindyMan said:
I meant it in the context in that what your government (or any government) says may not always be completely true. Whitewater happened because two people realized something was up, and that a simple burglary turned out to not be one. They did some digging, talked with sources inside government, obtained documents, and ultimately found their way to the truth. The real truth. Not the "it was just a burglary" truth.
...so you
are correlating release dates to Whitewater? You're actually sort of confusing me here with the back and forth motions you're taking.
In this case, what Nintendo is saying and what retail sources are saying conflict. Why do they conflict? Are the retailers wrong, or is Nintendo wrong? Everyone who thinks that this delay is impossible immediately assumes that the retailers MUST be wrong. Nintendo MUST be right. Well, why do you people think that way without thinking twice?
History, facts, logic, take your pick.
That's where journalism comes in. Not just gaming journalism, but journalism in general. WHY did the Whitewater break in occur? WHY do retailers and Nintendo have conflicting release dates for a very important game? There must be a reason, even if that reason is because retailers just have an incorrect date listed. But you can't assume that. That's why we checked it with multiple retailers. One retailer could have a wrong release date listed, sure. But three? And all with dates a full month after what Nintendo has listed? Something's fishy there.
Man, I was like you once. Silly and idealistic, I thought working for a blog/news site in disguise made me this significant journalist and every story or hot lead I chased down would lead to something amazing. It took almost four years of total irrelevancy before I could break in to anything that could be considered less than mediocre. And that's a short time. I started going to journalism school and realized that the idealism one spouts with regard to finding the "real truth" is ultimately without substance. Do or don't, words are cheap.
In any event, I have to reiterate once again, retailers adjusting dates happens
constantly. But no one ever pays attention. The Phoenix Wright community, for example, is incredibly small, so pretty much every fan knows everyone else. These people religiously follow the release dates for the game and Apollo Justice has been a roller coaster within the last month. Occasionally it would slip a few days on EBGames, then for some reason be in March in Amazon, then back to February where it belongs. The reason there aren't a hundred Apollo Justice threads about it on GAF is because no one cares to monitor these sort of things. I mean, who would, really.
When Nintendo delayed Brawl from late 2007 to where it is now, do you think they made that decision and then let everyone know about it the same day?
Yes.
Yes.
Japan originally had no date aside from TBA. Their date was announced as January 2008 at the same conference where Sonic was revealed. He was put up on the Dojo later that night. The only actual delay for the game came at the Nintendo Wii sit-down with journalists in October, when George Harrison announced the new date. That same day, every retailer changed its date. When the Japanese date was announced, people hit retailer sites for the next few days to see if there was a date change - there was not.
If this delay pans out (and I think it will), Nintendo is going to want to soften its blow with some good news, like it did with the original delay. People didn't realize the game got delayed initially because of the awesome news of Sonic's inclusion. Even when people found out, everyone was so excited about Sonic people forgave them. How many weeks before that announcement/delay combo do you think Nintendo decided to plan that out?
Are you new to the internet? Lots of people complained.
If gaming journalism wants to become a real journalism, then it needs to find things out before game companies tell us. Otherwise, we'll just be a tool for the game industry to report on things when they want us to. We're starting to go through that transition now. I think it would be nice if you started giving us (gaming journalism as a whole) the benefit of the doubt once in a while. Not just for something as trivial as a release date for a game that you will buy regardless. But for everything.
I am not arguing that investigative journalism is a bad thing, nor do I feel it is out of place in the gaming industry. I am saying, however, that you are placing a false crown upon your head if you think you're applying it to any extent here. You're making severe leaps of logic and have even admitted that, if Nintendo tells you "No Comment" about something, you are taking it as confirmation.
You are actually saying you expect to contact Nintendo and take no comment as confirmation. I mean, come on. Have you ever dealt with Nintendo in any significant fashion before? That's just laughable.