IceDoesntHelp
Banned
Bloodbourne is the most overrated game of the year.
The hyped up challenge dungeons being incredibly tedious, repetitive and grindy definitely would be a valid reason not to give BB GOTY. All the resources devoted to them could've been dedicated to the base game, especially since Miyazaki had very little to do with them iirc. The best thing to come out was the PvP dungeon.I hope people aren't arguing for Bloodborne with renewed vigour from the DLC. Without the DLC it's super light on content. I'm a big fan of the game and find it the most enjoyable to play out of the Souls games but the base game is super short, not many weapons and the chalice dungeons are too repetitive to really make up for hole. The DLC makes it into a great package but without it it's fairly middle of the pack when it comes to the Souls games.
The heavily marketed challenge dungeons being incredibly tedious definitely would be a valid reason not to give BB GOTY. All the resources devoted to them could've been dedicated to the base game, especially since Miyazaki had very little to do with them iirc. The best thing to come out was the PvP dungeon.
Wasn't there a W3 side quest thread recently that was just W3 fans shitting on Bioware and Bethesda? These kind of attitudes exist everywhere.I could pick more similar posts, only from here on gaf not from the whole Internet, if I were into it. But no, if you read several game awards and goty threads here, you can easily spot them anyway. Even here in this very thread. 'Witcher 3 combat is shit how can it win goty', 'Witcher 3 is just all about writing, how can it win goty', 'look at magnificent Bloodborne combat is, the true goty'. I know Souls combat is the best, but that kind of attitude from the fans are just unpleasant to see.
I'm interested as I'm a huge RPG fan. I've tried playing one, but it's just not my type of game. I'm one of those poor people who'll be yelled 'git gud!' by the elitists.
I could pick more similar posts, only from here on gaf not from the whole Internet, if I were into it. But no, if you read several game awards and goty threads here, you can easily spot them anyway. Even here in this very thread. 'Witcher 3 combat is shit how can it win goty', 'Witcher 3 is just all about writing, how can it win goty', 'look at magnificent Bloodborne combat is, the true goty'. I know Souls combat is the best, but that kind of attitude from the fans are just unpleasant to see.
I'm interested as I'm a huge RPG fan. I've tried playing one, but it's just not my type of game. I'm one of those poor people who'll be yelled 'git gud!' by the elitists.
Wasn't there a W3 side quest thread recently that was just W3 fans shitting on Bioware and Bethesda? These kind of attitudes exist everywhere.
Yea, it's quite a long game. Took me 90 hours. Mainly due to how many people I absolutely destroyed in Nightmare Frontier.base game is still like 50 hrs on first play-through. I don't get how people think that is not enough content.
Prefer to just ignore them. Choose your conversations carefully, as it's not like a lot of people on the internet want to have one. My personal feeling is that they're both good games but neither of them was my Game of the Year.Yeah. I understand. But when I have to wade through a thread with a Junior Member who is a blatant Witcher 3 fanboy (Which is FINE. He can be that.) because he has 90% of his posts relating to Witcher 3 content ... well I just get a little tired.
Especially when they go around boasting the combat in The Witcher 3 is leaps and bounds above Bloodborne.
Bloodborne most certainly ruined Witcher 3's combat system for me .... but the story and exploration / world elements are world class.
I hope people aren't arguing for Bloodborne with renewed vigour from the DLC. Without the DLC it's super light on content. I'm a big fan of the game and find it the most enjoyable to play out of the Souls games but the base game is super short, not many weapons and the chalice dungeons are too repetitive to really make up for hole. The DLC makes it into a great package but without it it's fairly middle of the pack when it comes to the Souls games.
Wasn't there a W3 side quest thread recently that was just W3 fans shitting on Bioware and Bethesda? These kind of attitudes exist everywhere.
W3 ruined narratives in other games, Bloodborne ruined combat in wrpgs, MGSV ruined tps controls etc..
Considering that it won absolutely nothing on the show, I would say it's the most underrated.Bloodbourne is the most overrated game of the year.
No one has wanted that. Not seeing the difference.There is a minor difference. Looking at the quality of the narrative, doesn't prescribe that other games follow the exact same style, format etc.
Typically what you see a lot is people wanting to plug souls combat into any and everything. It bring me to mind that famous Henry Ford quote.
There is a minor difference. Looking at the quality of the narrative, doesn't prescribe that other games follow the exact same style, format etc.
Typically what you see a lot is people wanting to plug souls combat into any and everything. It bring me to mind that famous Henry Ford quote.
Wasn't there a W3 side quest thread recently that was just W3 fans shitting on Bioware and Bethesda? These kind of attitudes exist everywhere.
W3 ruined narratives in other games, Bloodborne ruined combat in wrpgs, MGSV ruined tps controls etc..
Well those people are dumb lol... I fought with one that was like I DID CHALICE DUNGEONS ALL AT LEVEL 30 you suck and I'm like ok..? Rare individual, didn't encounter another one like him, and the git gud comment is suppose to be a joke. I think some peopel are now taking it too seriously and using it seriously...
No one has wanted that. Not seeing the difference.
No one has said that.
Given that is all they talk about, then it is clear they want the same systemic depth and combat encounters found in Souls games. This kind of thing was never going to be possible in a game of the scope of the witcher 3. There are certainly things that could make W3 more palatable, but I never hear what people want within the constraints of the W3's design.
Fair enough. I did saw similar comments about Witcher 3 as well, but I kinda missed those MGSV ones. They're mainly more.. mature, I guess. They don't bitch about how MGSV didn't win goty as well, even though the gameplay is top notch (I played it). I highly respect them and the series.
Well you do fight a lot in the game so the criticism for the combat is unavoidable.
Given that is all they talk about, then it is clear they want the same systemic depth and combat encounters found in Souls games. This kind of thing was never going to be possible in a game of the scope of the witcher 3. There are certainly things that could make W3 more palatable, but I never hear what people want within the constraints of the W3's design.
.Well you do fight a lot in the game so the criticism for the combat is unavoidable.
And this is a pretty common complaint of the game too. It's not like BB/Souls fans are making it up or something.
they don't btch about MGSV because it won an award and cause konami is evil, kojima wouldn't have even been able to accept it which is beeeesss af.
What do you want the combat to be like then? Beyond make it good.
Nah, it's more about Bloodborne not winning the goty, not about it's not winning any award. Just look at Witcher 3 GOTY thread, I believe you've been there as well. It's all about Bloodborne vs Witcher 3.
Making it good is exactly what they should do.
Make the control more responsive and snappy. Fix the lock on system.
Stop with the random spinning and jumping animations. If you want a Batman combat then go full way, don't half ass it.
Also they might have fix this with the new patch, but let players use every consumable items mid combat. I don't care if it breaks the lore or that kinda shit. That ship has sailed long time ago.
Nah, that's MGSVBloodbourne is the most overrated game of the year.
Ew gross, no. In fact they got too lenient in this regard in 3 versus 1/2.Making it good is exactly what they should do.
Make the control more responsive and snappy. Fix the lock on system.
Stop with the random spinning and jumping animations. If you want a Batman combat then go full way, don't half ass it.
Also they might have fixed this with the new patch, but let players use every consumable items mid combat. I don't care if it breaks the lore or that kinda shit. That ship has sailed long time ago.
There are other reasons to play games beyond the combat. If everyone appreciated combat as much as they're talking about, Transformers: Devastation would have won all of the GOTY awards and Bloodborne would be laughed out of the room. So trying to distill these two games down to two categories such as story and combat is reductive to the point of missing the bigger picture of why anyone plays a game.
Bloodbourne is the most overrated game of the year.
Nah, that's MGSV
Ew gross, no. In fact they got too lenient in this regard in 3 versus 1/2.
I went away for a few hours and this thread turned from bad to utterly embarrassing. Keep fighting the good fight, everyone.
Pirouettes are part of the witcher fighting style.Making it good is exactly what they should do.
Make the control more responsive and snappy. Fix the lock on system.
Stop with the random spinning and jumping animations. If you want a Batman combat then go full way, don't half ass it.
Also they might have fixed this with the new patch, but let players use every consumable items mid combat. I don't care if it breaks the lore or that kinda shit. That ship has sailed long time ago.
Thematically, it's so much more fitting to do the preparation. It's also way more satisfying and challenging than being able to glug down some milk or swallow down some chicken wings to heal in mid-battle.Yeah. So many people completely didn't understand the requirements for preparation in W2. Noted, that the game didn't really stress this point, but if you got it then you were set.
I actually think at least on this page people have been arguing constructively.
Surprised that It wasnt even nominated in Score/Soundtrack section! lol
The largest streaming website owned by google doesn't even have good anti 4chan and reddit protection, an independent awards show most certainly won't.I hope the award show moves to more a peoples choice type of online voting for awards, rather then letting a small jury pool decide. The problem always with small judge panels is that you end up splitting votes, leading to the same games dominating too many categories.
Yeah you could have vote brigading from reddit/gaf/4chan/etc but there's gotta be pretty decent anti-bot and vote-rigging mechanisms in place by now.
I particularly enjoy that guy who has been trying so hard to argue that The Witcher 3 only has good writing.
Pirouettes are part of the witcher fighting style.
![]()
And none of them have any notable animation priority and most of them are the exact same length/based on distance. There are also no jumping animations during combat. Especially in comparison to Witcher 2 which had a much worse issue with animation priority. It's also not trying to emulate batman combat at all. That's shadow of mordor.
I hope the award show moves to more a peoples choice type of online voting for awards, rather then letting a small jury pool decide. The problem always with small judge panels is that you end up splitting votes, leading to the same games dominating too many categories.
Yeah you could have vote brigading from reddit/gaf/4chan/etc but there's gotta be pretty decent anti-bot and vote-rigging mechanisms in place by now.
If they must have them then dedicate a button or a command for it so player can choose to do those moves at their will.
There's more to Bloodborne than just the excellent combat, it's level design is just some of the best you'll find anywhere, it can also have a few interesting stories, if you're willing to find them, but the game will never force you to.
That theme was amazing! It had great soundtracks like Cleric Beast (my favorite), The Hunter (Father G) and main theme, but not even nominated...This bothers me way more than it not winning GOTY, GTheme alone was worthy of the nomination.ehrman's
base game is still like 50 hrs on first play-through. I don't get how people think that is not enough content.
Took me 20 hours first time, only missed out on 2 optional bosses.
Compared to previous Souls games - BB is short. It's still my personal GOTY (almost tied with The Witcher) but the '50 hours' statement is super off base. I'm not even that good at BB and did my best to explore every area.
They do. It is a skill which you equip or unequip. The basic moveset is just a fast swing and a strong swing. Once. No piruette.
There is a larger swing in your video only happens if you're out of reach, but if you're within dodging distance then there is none of that.
I'm talking about the basic move set.
The hyped up challenge dungeons being incredibly tedious, repetitive and grindy definitely would be a valid reason not to give BB GOTY. All the resources devoted to them could've been dedicated to the base game, especially since Miyazaki had very little to do with them iirc. The best thing to come out was the PvP dungeon.
His acrobatic style is literally from the books. Asking to take that out is actually one of the weirder criticisms I've heard of the combat systems. Yes, let's completely ignore the lore of the source material and the reason he fights the way he does.Pirouettes are part of the witcher fighting style.
![]()
And none of them have any notable animation priority and most of them are the exact same length/based on distance. There are also no jumping animations during combat. Especially in comparison to Witcher 2 which had a much worse issue with animation priority. It's also not trying to emulate batman combat at all. That's shadow of mordor. You're basically asking them to stop making it feel like you're playing as a witcher.
Dear God, then you maybe shouldn't be playing games like The Witcher.Also, I already said I don't care about the lore. This is the case where the lore is actually hurting the game design.