greycolumbus
The success of others absolutely infuriates me.
I'll say this much: I'm not sure if the regular folk will want an Xbox One or PS4. I don't see a reason to upgrade.
If Sony follows suit, then yes.
This. After tonight, Sony seems to be in a position to be the gamers "savior" for this gen. Hopefully they don't fuck it up.
I'll say this much: I'm not sure if the regular folk will want an Xbox One or PS4. I don't see a reason to upgrade.
![]()
Of course not. As much froth as you are all wiping from your mouths right now, do any of you actually believe that this wont sell well? at least in the US/EU?
Seriously, no way this isn't standard on PS4 as well, which actually makes what SONY said previously about DRM being up to the developers kind of throwing them under the bus I guess. MS taking one for the team??? This shit is getting crazySo everybody is believing EA just left Nintendo and Online Passes 'cause of one single console?
Oh cheese-n-rice with the obsession over a 2nd game crash. Why people have such a hard on for this, I'll never know. Everything is a sign of the 2nd game crash. The layoffs that happen every year. The mobile market making money. Facebook games (snorts). It's all going toward a gaming apocalypse! There's more money being made in gaming today than ever. You'll see the signs of a crash when no one is buying games anymore.
No. Because we're at a point in gaming where the definition is too big to kill.
Is it possible the new consoles could flop? Sure. But that doesn't mean the PC market goes down. It doesn't mean the indies stop developing there, or on iOS/Android. Shit, it wouldn't even mean the handheld market would slow down. Will AAA games slow down in this scenario, sure. But if you're like me, the scope of gaming has gone so far beyond what it was in the 80's.
Saying "gaming could crash", is like thinking journalism will die because print newspapers are out of business. It's too big to kill.
no!! It's 3DS!All the potential Xbox1 and PS4 gamers will flock to Vita.
And it will be GLORIOUS!
nope, most people don't give a shit about used games or always online- see iOS or Steam
If Sony follows suit, then yes.
It's really just such a shitty move to pull. There is literally no upside to this decision for the consumer-it's all con and no pro. It shows the level of respect MS has for us as customers. To think that a company this massive lost all goodwill with fans with this one stupid move is amazing. Hopefully years from now we will look back at this as a watershed moment when the customers took a stand against this shit and it was detrimental to MS.
At least Iwata said "please understand".
Well, that might depend on what Sony does, if Microsoft fails it ends up showing the masses don't really care for the functionality that comes at the expense of many of the things we take for granted, and if Sony ends up doing similarly anyway (doubt it if developing nations are a top priority) then I could see either a collapse or at least accelerated contraction. Depends on the PC space I guess then.No.
What we're seeing is contraction in the console gaming industry, which is why both Nintendo and Microsoft have bucked "tradition" in an attempt to reach out in different ways to expanded audiences.
If they both fail (Nintendo already has), the worst case scenario is slow contraction. I do not believe a complete collapse is at all likely.
If Sony follows suit, then yes.
i know it hasn't been like this for a few years, but i really miss the whole "pop in the game and play" appeal of early video game consoles.
now it seems like you'll have to "register" the game, install, and then possibly update.. just to play a fucking video GAME
:-/
This. After tonight, Sony seems to be in a position to be the gamers "savior" for this gen. Hopefully they don't fuck it up.
I don't think so what MS is doing is a way for these companies to survive longer i guess because we all know the publishers are going to be furiously greedy
No.
Modern consoles are simply changing, catching up to what PCs are already doing. These DRM strategies come along with it.
Instead of simply being dismissive, feel free to post counter examples, positive lights on the gaming industry. I'm sure there are charts showing the overall revenue of the industry has gone up in recent years, that would be a good place to start.
This thread isn't about "ON NOES! DOOMSDAY!" It's about discussion on the topic. I have absolutely no problem with people stating they think otherwise, but a little more context and a little less snark is more conductive.
Please show me where.Sony has already said they'll allow used games and the PS4 doesn't require an internet connection to use.
Admittedly depending on your preferences it won't really matter: the types of games you enjoy vanish, stuff you don't care as much for is not only still around but possibly more prevalent, and thus without entertainment options that appeal to you it's gone for you.As others have mentioned, when people talk about a "gaming crash" on GAF, what they almost invariably mean is a "home console gaming crash" or "AAA gaming" crash. They don't say it that way, mind you, but if Sony and MS exited the scene and gaming was dominated by indie PC stuff, browser games, iOS/Android and 3DS, many on GAF would basically call that a "market crash" from their perspective. For many, those other platforms/ecosystems might as well not exist.
i know it hasn't been like this for a few years, but i really miss the whole "pop in the game and play" appeal of early video game consoles.
now it seems like you'll have to "register" the game, install, and then possibly update.. just to play a fucking video GAME
:-/
As others have mentioned, when people talk about a "gaming crash" on GAF, what they almost invariably mean is a "home console gaming crash" or "AAA gaming" crash. They don't say it that way, mind you, but if Sony and MS exited the scene and gaming was dominated by indie PC stuff, browser games, iOS/Android and 3DS, many on GAF would basically call that a "market crash" from their perspective. For many, those other platforms/ecosystems might as well not exist.
Yes. A game that has (in some cases) millions in costs. It is not a game to the people who spent years making it or to those who put their dollars on the line. Games are not the same as they were in those days.
I know some of you may not see it this way, but some of these steps are being taken to protect developers who may need protections like this in the future. To protect those developers who if they fail in the face of casual mobile gaming, would legitimately signal the demise of "gaming."
Correct me if I am wrong, but I have not heard much backlash from developers or publishers about any of these issues.