I'm trying to understand how Trump is simply a political view, and not a redflag for something far more toxic. Do you think his rhetoric is merely a political opinion to muslims, in this country and outside, or the 11 millions undocumented immigrants, many of which are children and others who have been here for a long time? Or those that could be really fucked over by who he would appoint to the courts? We have the the platform he's running on, and much of it abhorrent in it's extremes, and having mass support behind such extremes doesn't exactly have no precedent in the dangers it can cause.
I guess I see something shameful about that, go figure.
Regarding his stance on immigration, it's honestly very simple and black and white for some people. Breaking the law should not grant you amnesty from the law. I mean when you phrase it that way it's kind of obvious right? "We have these laws on the books, but once you break them, you're immune from the punishment". It makes no sense right? Either shit or get off the pot. If you want an open border then open the border, and say anyone can come here. Otherwise, if you're going to have alws, they should be enforced. There's no need to look deeper than this for many people, and it's not seen as racist either because it simply discussing the enforcement of an existing law. Not against a particular race, but against all violators of the law, which due to geographical factors beyond any politicians control, happens to consist predominantly of one group of people. But the policy doesn't target the people, it targets the violators of the law, whomever they may be.
I'm sure there are many people who hate Mexicans and want to see them all go back to Mexico. Many of those people probably support Trump. I am not one of those people, although I agree with Trump on immigration for the most part.[1] You (and many others) view his ideas as biased against immigrants from Latin America. I view the
current situation as biased against immigrants from
everywhere else. Why should Africans, or Chinese, or Vietnamese, or Burmese, or Ukranian, or Filipino, or anyone else for that matter be at an unfair disadvantage? It takes 10+ years to go through the process legally, and these people are waiting patiently enduring shit conditions in their own countries, while some people hop the border and the government turns a blind eye. Why should our policy and enforcement of the existing laws unfairly favor a particular group of people?
Everyone deserves an equal opportunity to come here, and they all should do it under the same system. This isn't treating mexicans or guatemalans or anyone else from Latin America unfairly, it's treating the rest of the world fairly.
Then there is the issue of crime. I'm not going to go all the way like Trump did and say that they're all rapists and murderers, but surely we can agree that within any community of people (including legal immigrants, and even citizens(!)) there will be crime. And that it is easier to tackle the problem of crime among groups of people who are documented, as opposed to undocumented. So it is in everyone's best interest to get everyone documented. Sure, you can just issue them ID cards like many politicians on the left support. But, from my point of view, this goes back to my first point (breaking the law should not grant you amnesty from the law).
[1] - Except for the part where he wants to revoke birthright citizenship, since that was by definition citizenship obtained through means that are/were legal. People who obtained birthright citizenship legally (using whatever laws constituted "legally" at the time the citizenship was obtained) should keep it in my opinion.