So I talked to my wife again and she said that she felt that the first part, she could have gotten through inference but the last part about Patrice is what really threw her off and surprised her.
The first thing she said to my wife is that she's a teacher.
But my wife said she was fumbling through her bag looking for another dollar. I checked my wife's bag and it wasn't her work bag so it didn't have any school ID in there, just a bag for my daughter's portable toilet seat, some kleenex, and a "Dance Stop" sweatshirt for my daughter.
Maybe she very quickly saw something in my wife's wallet when she opened it to take out a bill?
The second part, she asked if something was pulling my wife and I apart. She asked to see a picture of me. My wife says that this part is likely based on inference but this is the part where she was able to deduce that I travel a lot and work across the country in California. But even my wife says she can see how she could maybe figure this out because she started with the "pulling us apart" bit, asked if it was work related (common, I guess), asked if I travel a lot, but was able to nail the California part.
The third part is what my wife says really baffles her because again, she asked about someone causing her grief at work and said she saw a name "Patrice...Patty". And indeed, her co-worker's name is Patrice ("but everyone calls her Patty" -- my wife). And indeed, she has been causing my wife a bit of grief.
The first two, now that I have the full story again, I could see maybe she picked up if she was super observant. Maybe she saw an ID the moment my wife pulled open her wallet. Maybe she saw CA or California somewhere on my wife's phone when she pulled it out since it may be on her calendar.
That last part is still baffling me a bit.