• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

So Women can go topless in NYC?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't see any logical reason for the rule of law to tell us what to wear.

really? you couldn't conjure up a single logical reason? with so many sex crimes being committed these days, you couldn't see how people going about naked might compound that? not one reason? did you even try?

breasts, despite not being officially classified as such, have all the same connotations as genitalia. you would not let somone get their gentials out in public, hence why women can't go topless but men can.
 
djkimothy said:
Fixed.

And girls in Ottawa do it all the time. ;)

You have to tell me where these women in Ottawa are because I haven't ever seen them.
 
Why is it that its legal, yet we get prosecuted if we do it? Shouldn't police officers be aware of their own district laws?

We are a sex addicted country, yet bare female breasts can cause accidents. Dont know about other women, but I dont run into other vehicles when I see a shirtless man...we all have nipples :lol Guess the shock of it is the danger for men?
 
PhoenixDark said:
True, although I don't see it as people telling you what to wear; seems like more of an issue of being told to wear some damn clothes.

The problem with your arguments so far ITT is that they assume that people accept part of your premise as absolute truth, in this case, "people need to wear some damn clothes." I would never go outside naked, even were it perfectly acceptable to do so - or at least, not illegal to do so - but that's not really what we're arguing about.

Now granted, this is a fairly common viewpoint, but you need to justify it with something more than its popularity or its apparent obviousness if we're going to have a reasonable discussion.

So this goes for you, or anyone else really who feels that way... Why do you think the state has the right to regulate its citizenry's dress or prohibit their nudity? Is it an act of aggression to be naked? Do you have an inherent right to not see someone else walking around naked? Tell us the logical backing for your point of view.

Zenith said:
really? you couldn't conjure up a single logical reason?

Hey, I'm in the mood to argue, but not so badly I'd help argue the opposition's case for them. If you take a side, you make up the reasons. :D

with so many sex crimes being committed these days, you couldn't see how people going about naked might compound that?

The argument to counter this is obvious - the topless / naked woman is not responsible for the actions of the person that sexually assaults her. The mere act of being nude does not make you into someone that will molest children. So forth and so on.

People that would commit an aggressive act like a sex crime need to be locked up, and probably for the rest of their lives.

To demonstrate your case, you'd have to show a high incident rate of rape and whatnot in nudist colonies.

breasts, despite not being officially classified as such, have all the same connotations as genitalia. you would not let somone get their gentials out in public, hence why women can't go topless but men can.

If the argument you're up against is "Why can't people walk around nude, please explain?" then this line of reasoning falls flat.
 
Zenith said:
breasts, despite not being officially classified as such, have all the same connotations as genitalia. you would not let somone get their gentials out in public, hence why women can't go topless but men can.
That doesn't explain the numerous societies that managed not devolve into a rapeathon while making no such restrictions of women going topless. This is just cultural interia, not the natural state of how things must be. "But it's tradition!!!" isn't a real argument.
 
There was an episode on this on Penn&Teller:Bullshit...i'm not sure what state the chick was in who was protesting, but apparently it was legal to bare your breast in protest(it's protected under free speech or something), but it's illegal to bare your breast in any other context outside of protesting for the right to bare your breast :lol
 
Are you guess all Lawyers? I dunno what these guys are talking about but

bob_arctor said:
1170296563456.gif

its taking way too long for bob to tell us the name of the chick and where this clip came from!

hurry up dude!
 
JayDubya said:
Well, granted I can't help but ogle on account of being weak-willed, but that's not their fault, now is it?

I dunno, it's just kind of odd to have a public dress code. Don't see any logical reason for the rule of law to tell us what to wear.

Of course, since every private business and workplace and whatnot have the right to exclude you based on your dress, it kind of means you have to conform to a certain norm anyway. This is more of a fine point, principle-of-the-thing issue, but that doesn't make it a non-issue.
Oh my God I actually agree with JD. WTF.
 
This topic really confuses me.

One one hand if women were to be allowed to bare their breasts, would it result in less attention? Would men become "used" to it much as men became used to women bearing their legs? It would probably feel good for women to be able to remove their tops on a hot day, not to mention bras can atrophy the muscles which hold the breasts up, leading to stronger muscles and perkier breasts (but in reality time will have it's way and breasts do sag after a while, no matter what you do.)

Now, on the other hand breasts are a sexual organ. The breasts are made to look like the rear, which is necessary in us bipedal creatures, because we don't walk around on all-fours with our face right up to the rear of the other person in front of us. Human females are the only mammals that always have swollen breasts. Our bipedal motion is the reason for this.

Being a sexual organ, the opposite sex is naturally attracted to this feature. This may cause unwanted attention on the female.

Ugh, now my brain stopped working, anyways you get my point. This is a really good topic though.
 
GSG Flash said:
You have to tell me where these women in Ottawa are because I haven't ever seen them.
On occasion you'll see some girls tanning at Westboro beach. That's where I tend t find the highest concentratrions anyways. ;)
 
djkimothy said:
On occasion you'll see some girls tanning at Westboro beach. That's where I tend t find the highest concentratrions anyways. ;)

Interesting, Westboro beach is the only beach I haven't been to here.
 
JayDubya said:
So this goes for you, or anyone else really who feels that way... Why do you think the state has the right to regulate its citizenry's dress or prohibit their nudity? Is it an act of aggression to be naked? Do you have an inherent right to not see someone else walking around naked? Tell us the logical backing for your point of view.

I don't solely see it from a perspective of what the government can and can't tell us to do. Public nudity is falls into the social norm category in this country. Behavior in violation of this is deemed unacceptable; laws on the subject have been molded by this mores, and the majority of society seems to agree.

Do I have an inherent right to not see someone walking around naked? No. But society universally demands it, just as they wouldn't accept publicly displayed sexual acts.
 
The argument to counter this is obvious - the topless / naked woman is not responsible for the actions of the person that sexually assaults her. The mere act of being nude does not make you into someone that will molest children. So forth and so on.

uh, actually I was thinking more along the lines of naked men rubbing up against people.
 
JayDubya: Well, one good reason for having people keep their pants on is hygiene. Public health and such. Of course, this doesn't necessarily apply to the subject at hand.
 
The Faceless Master said:
anything north of virginia isn't a beach, it's just a place where land meets water.

Haven't been to Long Island I take it? I don't really have a lot of positives to say about this place but one thing is we have some really awesome beaches here. Unfortunately they're usually crowded as hell :P
 
Zenith said:
breasts, despite not being officially classified as such, have all the same connotations as genitalia. you would not let somone get their gentials out in public, hence why women can't go topless but men can.

Breasts are only as sexualized as genitalia because they've been mystified in similar fashion forever. In tribal lands you don't see guys accidentally spearing each other because a girl with big bare tits walks by. It's always been like this for women though, even back when they used to have to wear those big ass bathing suits.

152fs487424.png
 
karasu said:
Breasts are only as sexualized as genitalia because they've been mystified in similar fashion forever. In tribal lands you don't see guys accidentally spearing each other because a girl with big bare tits walks by. It's always been like this for women though, even back when they used to have to wear those big ass bathing suits.

152fs487424.png
Daaaaamn you see the ankles on her!?
 
Mercury Fred said:
Another reason why NYC rocks.

I never understood why a man can go bare chested but a woman can't.

I'll probably go watch the Dyke March (the actual name almost all the women who march in it use) on Saturday afternoon. About 50% of the women will be topless too :lol
....well, as long as the woman is attractive. Fat chicks need not apply.
 
karasu said:
Breasts are only as sexualized as genitalia because they've been mystified in similar fashion forever. In tribal lands you don't see guys accidentally spearing each other because a girl with big bare tits walks by. It's always been like this for women though, even back when they used to have to wear those big ass bathing suits.

Women are the only female mammal that has swollen breasts even when they are not pregnant (yes I know they get even bigger when pregnant). Women's breasts have evolved into being sexualized and large perky tits are see as a sign of healthiness and fertility in our primative parts of our brain. Thus why men get turned on by them. I'm sure in tribal lands men still do love to look at a nice young pair of breasts, but probably not turned on as much due to constant exposure to them.
 
Midna said:
This topic really confuses me.

One one hand if women were to be allowed to bare their breasts, would it result in less attention? Would men become "used" to it much as men became used to women bearing their legs? It would probably feel good for women to be able to remove their tops on a hot day, not to mention bras can atrophy the muscles which hold the breasts up, leading to stronger muscles and perkier breasts (but in reality time will have it's way and breasts do sag after a while, no matter what you do.)

Now, on the other hand breasts are a sexual organ. The breasts are made to look like the rear, which is necessary in us bipedal creatures, because we don't walk around on all-fours with our face right up to the rear of the other person in front of us. Human females are the only mammals that always have swollen breasts. Our bipedal motion is the reason for this.

Being a sexual organ, the opposite sex is naturally attracted to this feature. This may cause unwanted attention on the female.

Ugh, now my brain stopped working, anyways you get my point. This is a really good topic though.


OMG A GIRL A GIRL ON GAF A GIRL OMG

well, that's what happens to me when i see a girl <walks weird to the bathroom>
 
Pimpbaa said:
Women are the only female mammal that has swollen breasts even when they are not pregnant (yes I know they get even bigger when pregnant). Women's breasts have evolved into being sexualized and large perky tits are see as a sign of healthiness and fertility in our primative parts of our brain. Thus why men get turned on by them. I'm sure in tribal lands men still do love to look at a nice young pair of breasts, but probably not turned on as much due to constant exposure to them.

Finally.
 
My 2 cents.

Women that wanna go topless and also breastfeed in public? Let them.

We will see how quick those tops go on once all the cell phone cameras come out and they end up on amateur porn sites like the upskirt & public toilet ones.
 
karasu said:
Breasts are only as sexualized as genitalia because they've been mystified in similar fashion forever. In tribal lands you don't see guys accidentally spearing each other because a girl with big bare tits walks by. It's always been like this for women though, even back when they used to have to wear those big ass bathing suits.

then how come men have always loved sucking on breasts during sex, even in ancient Greek times where breasts were frequently on display.
 
Zenith said:
then how come men have always loved sucking on breasts during sex, even in ancient Greek times where breasts were frequently on display.

Because it's still associated with sex and sexuality. It feeds babies, which are created through... sex.

And I mean really, who would see one of those and not take a little suckle?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom