aoi tsuki said:When people put up with less than fully-functional products, it tells the companies that manufacture them that they can get away with putting them on the shelves to begin with. Dead pixels aren't necessarily the fault of the manufacturer, and like you said, come with the technology. Companies should expect returns on the small percentage of devices that have dead pixels, just as they expect a small percentage of screens to have defects. If i'm not mistaken, there's processes in production that would virtually eliminate dead pixels, but it's really an issue of dimishing returns for manufacturers.
i'm glad you're happy with your tv. i would've asked to see the tv in operation or at least test it at the store before driving home with it. i'm not going to pay for something only to know and see that it's flawed.
Then, never pay for LCD based products. It's like buying a CRT TV expecting it to have 100% correct geometry, you can't have that. It's also the nature of the technology.aoi tsuki said:When people put up with less than fully-functional products, it tells the companies that manufacture them that they can get away with putting them on the shelves to begin with. Dead pixels aren't necessarily the fault of the manufacturer, and like you said, come with the technology. Companies should expect returns on the small percentage of devices that have dead pixels, just as they expect a small percentage of screens to have defects. If i'm not mistaken, there's processes in production that would virtually eliminate dead pixels, but it's really an issue of dimishing returns for manufacturers.
i'm glad you're happy with your tv. i would've asked to see the tv in operation or at least test it at the store before driving home with it. i'm not going to pay for something only to know and see that it's flawed.
I don't think anyone thinks this is PSP only. Sony basically saying "fuck off" to the people with defective units is the real issue here.DarienA said:For those thinking that this is a PSP problem, google the words "lcd dead pixel". ANY LCD screen from any manufacturer has the potential of having this problem, and there is no ISO standard for defining how many constitutes a defect. Actually there are ISO standards for different classes of LCD screens... but apparently it gets kinda funky.
http://www.behardware.com/articles/519/page2.html
Anywhere on the box or the manual of the PSP does it denote what Class of LCD the screen is?
Justin Bailey said:I don't think anyone thinks this is PSP only. Sony basically saying "fuck off" to the people with defective units is the real issue here.
By that standard, almost any LCD TV ever made is defective.Justin Bailey said:I don't think anyone thinks this is PSP only. Sony basically saying "fuck off" to the people with defective units is the real issue here.
Hellraizah said:Then, never pay for LCD based products. It's like buying a CRT TV expecting it to have 100% correct geometry, you can't have that. It's also the nature of the technology.
What's next ? People returning PSPs for the trail effect of LCD ?
Better yet, people returning PSPs because the black level is not up to par ?
Dead pixels have always been part of LCD, just like the trail effect, just like the "poor" black levels.
Ok, let's get this straight. If someone is not happy with Sony's warranty for PSP, why buy one and complain ? Just don't buy it.Jonnyboy117 said:Getting a perfect screen shouldn't be like opening a box of Cracker Jacks and hoping for a non-sucky prize. It is possible to produce LCD screens without dead pixels; my new DS has two spotless screens. My first DS had one dead pixel, and you're damn straight I sent it to NOA's repair service and had it replaced for free in less than a week, with free return shipping and could have had free outbound shipping except the closest FedEx center is thirty miles away.
If the policy is real, this is a case of Sony being cheap bastards and not willing to pay what it takes to produce a real quality product.
As for buying the LCD television with dead pixels: you lose. It's your money, better get what you want for it.
Yeah, I guess if almost every LCD TV out there has dead pixels and people are dumb enough to keep buying them then sure, you're right.Hellraizah said:By that standard, almost any LCD TV ever made is defective.
Dr. Zoidberg said:Hey, If the store you purchased from won't let you return for the pixels, just update the firmware with that buggy one people found from JAP launch and then take it in and say you don't know what happened to it.
Would this work? Anyone?
Which isn't the case with a 4 INCH SCREEN.Hellraizah said:Ok, let's get this straight. If someone is not happy with Sony's warranty for PSP, why buy one and complain ? Just don't buy it.
For the LCD TV I bought, I have maybe 3 or 4 dead pixels. On a 23" 720p display, you'll never see it unless you're VERY close to the TV
cybamerc said:It must be nice having such plain ignorant customers.
DarienA said:For those thinking that this is a PSP problem, google the words "lcd dead pixel". ANY LCD screen from any manufacturer has the potential of having this problem, and there is no ISO standard for defining how many constitutes a defect. Actually there are ISO standards for different classes of LCD screens... but apparently it gets kinda funky.
JPRaup said:thats a great idea, if the firmware actually makes it buggy, anyone have any experience with this?
You're right, Sony probably replaces the PSP is there's more than XX% of pixels that are dead (I think someone said 0.01%).kaching said:Hellraizah, there may be a few here that are being a little unrealistic about their expectations with LCD tech, but I think the more unfortunate issue is the rigidity of the Sony policy. One would hope it would make allowances for occurences of larger amounts of dead pixels on a single screen, which doesn't seem to be the case based on how this policy is being paraphrased. I would be interested to see the actual terms of the policy that Sony is notifying retailers with though.
Hellraizah said:For the people saying it's a gamble to buy the PSP, there's a lot of hardware in video games that are a gamble to buy right now (Xbox Thomson, Philips or Samsung drives is a good example of this).
ninge said:even checking at the counter wont guarantee you are safe - pixels can become dead with use.
My japaense PSP was perfect when i got it.. i checked it thoroughly before buying it. Since then 1 pixel has locked to white (its one pixel in on the edge of the screen by the square button so its not really that bad unless the screen is all black like lumines load screen) and 5 others appear to not show the correct colour with light colours or are locked to a dark colour.
its annoying that i can see the one white one while playing lumines.. but i've got to really study it hard in zero abmient light to see the others and while playing any other game i dont notice them at all
Yeah there's no one forcing me to buy it, but if enough people actually complain instead of being content with whatever they dish out then they might change it.Hellraizah said:Justin, I know that dead pixels are probably more evident on a 4 inch screens, which is exactly why buying a PSP if you can't stand ANY dead pixels is dumb when Sony says they don't cover that on their warranty.
There's no one forcing you to buy a product if you don't like the conditions of the sale.
Even though dead pixels don't mean "defective unit", if Nintendo is cool enough to replace ANY DS with 1 dead pixel, more power to them. People should consider buying a DS instead if that's the conditions they want for warranty on a LCD screen.
You can't decide what kind of warranty is offered on a product you buy, the company that makes the product does.
jiji said:![]()
"Dead pixels are not defects! They enhance your gaming experience!"
Again, it's the nature of the technology and if you don't like the conditions, you can refuse to buy the product in the first place.Wyzdom said:What i don't like about this story is a compagny telling us a dead pixel isn't a defect.
Let's put this simple: I buy 2 PSP. One is having a dead pixel and the other don't = it's a defect. It's not everybody having a dead pixel then it renders your dead pixel as a defect by definition and logic.
Oh yeah and +1 Nintendo for their intelligent service.
That's a stuck pixel, which is entirely different. Dead pixels do NOT form with use. Dead pixels are completely dark, or "dead", pixels on a screen. A stuck pixel will generally show up as a bright color (red, white, green, etc.) and can form over time. They can also disappear, though I wouldn't count on it...
I don't think you can repair dead pixels.android said:Could Sony just fix the dead pixels on the units they get back and then recycle them back onto the market? Or is it a unrepairable.
I do agree with this. Differences in warranty aside, very little else is different. The quality assurance involved at the factory is no different whether you buy a PSP or a DS (or any device with an LCD) - each device that leaves the assembly line has a potential for the occurence of dead/stuck pixels that goes unchecked by the manufacturer. In each case, it's still up to you the consumer to buy the device and discover the pixel problems yourself, which may be noticeable immediately or may occur several days after purchase, and in each case it's up to you to seek reparations/replacement. A no questions asked replacement policy on the part of the manufacturer is nice, but as some have already indicated by their own experiences, it still doesn't guarantee that the replacement is "defect" free because the quality assurance process is no different.Hellraizah said:Even though dead pixels don't mean "defective unit", if Nintendo is cool enough to replace ANY DS with 1 dead pixel, more power to them. People should consider buying a DS instead if that's the conditions they want for warranty on a LCD screen.
You can't decide what kind of warranty is offered on a product you buy, the company that makes the product does.
Was that directed at me?Hellraizah said:I don't think you can repair dead pixels.
And yeah, people could complain, but what would it change ? Dead pixels have been part of LCD screens for years, and for years it has not been covered by warranty (except if there is more than a pre set percentage). Whine all you want, you should instead avoid the technology if that is unacceptable to you. Seeking for perfection in any type of display is a lost cause....
It could change their warranty. Nintendo covers it and they are a direct competitor. That alone should change Sony's tone.Hellraizah said:And yeah, people could complain, but what would it change ? Dead pixels have been part of LCD screens for years, and for years it has not been covered by warranty (except if there is more than a pre set percentage). Whine all you want, you should instead avoid the technology if that is unacceptable to you. Seeking for perfection in any type of display is a lost cause....
Yeah, it's an extremely small number of units. That's why Sony shouldn't mind covering them.If less that 0.01% of dead pixels is too much for you, don't bother with the PSP.
And?xsarien said:Also, we're completely ignoring the fact that these displays aren't manufactured by Sony, they're bought from Sharp.
Jonnyboy117 said:Getting a perfect screen shouldn't be like opening a box of Cracker Jacks and hoping for a non-sucky prize. It is possible to produce LCD screens without dead pixels; my new DS has two spotless screens. My first DS had one dead pixel, and you're damn straight I sent it to NOA's repair service and had it replaced for free in less than a week, with free return shipping and could have had free outbound shipping except the closest FedEx center is thirty miles away.
If the policy is real, this is a case of Sony being cheap bastards and not willing to pay what it takes to produce a real quality product.
As for buying the LCD television with dead pixels: you lose. It's your money, better get what you want for it.
No, I don't even know what you said in this thread.android said:Was that directed at me?
Oh just looked like it because it followed your answer to my question. nevermind thenHellraizah said:No, I don't even know what you said in this thread.
Benedict said:And?
Since the screen is such an essential part of the "playstation experience" one should expect it to be without errors.
If something breaks in my car, a Mazda, should I call the company who makes the car, Mazda, or the company who manufactured the faulty part and delivered it to Mazda who then used it in their car?
Does this seem logical?
You're right about this, but I really doubt Sony gives a flying fuck about competition with Nintendo.Justin Bailey said:It could change their warranty. Nintendo covers it and they are a direct competitor. That alone should change Sony's tone.
xsarien said:A proper analogy would be to go bitching to Mazda because the tires are showing wear. Dead and stuck pixels are inherent to the technology. There is nothing Sharp or Sony can do about it. At least, without making the PSP so expensive that it'd be futile to release it at all.
Want to show your displeasure? Don't buy the damned thing, more for the rest of us.
but .. but .. it's the nature of rubber technology that it wears!.hacked said:I would bitch at Mazda if my Tires showed wear as soon as I drove it off the lot.
Hellraizah said:Again, it's the nature of the technology and if you don't like the conditions, you can refuse to buy the product in the first place.
If less that 0.01% of dead pixels is too much for you, don't bother with the PSP.
The Faceless Master said:but .. but .. it's the nature of rubber technology that it wears!