Dunlop said:Nope, but do you doubt it has happened? Especially in the PSP camp?
Okay. Now that we've narrowed it down. Which developer has lost his or her job undoubtedly due to piracy in the 'PSP camp'?
Dunlop said:Nope, but do you doubt it has happened? Especially in the PSP camp?
Engadget said:We figured Sony would follow up last night's temporary restraining order against Geohot and fail0verflow for distribution of the PS3 jailbreak with a copyright infringement lawsuit, and well, here it is. It's actually pretty straightforward, as far as these things go -- Sony alleges that George Hotz, Hector Martin Cantero, Sven Peter, and the rest of fail0verflow are:
Violating §1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which forbids bypassing access control measures;
Violating the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which forbids accessing computers without authorization;
Guilty of contributory copyright infringement for encouraging and helping others to crack PS3s as well;
Violating the California Computer Crime Law, which is the state computer fraud act (think of this as a backup fraud claim);
Violating the PlayStation Network's Terms of Service (which feels meaningless, really);
Interfering with Sony's relationships with other PSN customers (also meaningless);
Trespassing on Sony's ownership right to the PS3 (this one feels weak) and;
Misappropriating Sony's intellectual property (another weak argument, but there in case the copyright argument fails).
Sony's asking the court to forbid Geohot and fail0verflow from distributing the jailbreak and turn over all computer hardware and software that contain the jailbreak code, as well as unspecified damages and attorneys' fees. Yep, these boys done got sued -- and we're sure there'll be some serious fireworks once they lawyer up and fight right back.
Cruzader said:PC = Open platform
PS3 = closed platform
Not sure why PC keeps getting compared to a console. Apples to oranges.
Also MS bans those using hacked FW from Live, Sony can too.
Really?jmdajr said:I wonder how many homebrew supporters are pro-guns.
Yeah I know, one is entertainment and the other is people's lives.
But the main point seems to be in the sense of..."guns don't kill people, ...people do."
Shadow780 said:It's a legitimate concern, why should people wait for it to exist before voicing their opinions?
Vinci said:Okay. Now that we've narrowed it down. Which developer has lost his or her job undoubtedly due to piracy in the 'PSP camp'?
mentioning that in a lawsuit? really? :lolEngadget said:Violating the PlayStation Network's Terms of Service
those behind github are likewise culpable for hosting said tools. regardless of any intrinsic worth github may have, it's clear that since these actions will help contribute to future game piracy, the site should be taken down.charlequin said:Full release of all fail0verflow tools to date online.
I think this strategy may not have played out quite how Sony was hoping.
Subliminal said:Its not job loss.
Its the sickening fact that someone plays something for free that was made by sometimes hundreds of people all just trying to make a living for themselves.
Its theft and its disgusting.
Steve Youngblood said:Really?
Steve Youngblood said:Who is losing their jobs because of this?
What's ignorant about wanting to allow people to use their expensive hardware to do things that the platform holder didn't explicitly sign off on? The fact that this in turn often makes piracy possible is beside the point.
Engadget is all of a sudden an expert on law enforcement.Burger said:
JADS said:Wait, aren't Marcan and Sven not living in the States?
Jobiensis said:Yes, apparently it's time for another bad analogy.
extraordinary rendition, gitmo and military tribunals.intheinbetween said:Marcan is spanish, actually he lives in Spain atm. I wonder what will happen
jmdajr said:I wonder how many homebrew supporters are pro-guns.
Yeah I know, one is entertainment and the other is people's lives.
But the main point seems to be in the sense of..."guns don't kill people, ...people do."
Freedoms has it's consequences. Everyone has a different point of view of what they want to put up with.
It wasnt trully open since Linux itself was limited and yea those were nice "open" features but PC and PS3 are 2 different beasts. Comparing PC piracy with PS3 piracy though is/will be similar.(easy)captmcblack said:PS3 used to be open, because it was able to run Linux. That is one of the reasons it was compared to a PC, not to mention its other numerous features, ports and open format support.
They took that feature away.
We know how that went.
scorcho said:extraordinary rendition, gitmo and military tribunals.
I honestly know what you're getting at, but the fact of the matter is that the comparison is completely disingenuous given your own acknowledgment -- in one case we're talking about weapons that can easily kill people, and in the other we're talking about people potentially playing video games for free. Furthermore, if you want to generalize and break things down into neat little boxes, the types of people who are pro-gun regulation tend to be more liberal. What are liberals known for? Well, they're certainly not against civil liberties and for corporations, that's for sure.jmdajr said:yes REALLY
Zeal said:jesus, put the crack pipe down and get the fuck outta here. worst analogy in the history of internet land.
yeah, i'm sure everyone's jailbroken ps3s are gonna go more than meets the eye (along with the cheesy transformation sound) and start shooting plasma missiles at random innocents.
jmdajr said:My analogy is perfectly reasonable.
Zeal said:yeah for someone with autism. sorry, it's beyond idiotic.
jmdajr said:My analogy is perfectly reasonable.
intheinbetween said:Marcan is spanish, actually he lives in Spain atm. I wonder what will happen
game developers livelihoods. much like an unborn child, you can't put a price on that.intheinbetween said:wait, what? who did he kil? :lol
and as such we need to seriously reconsider freedom of speech.jmdajr said:My analogy is perfectly reasonable. If you guys want to get mad that's cool.
My whole point is freedom has it's consequences. People want to use their consoles as they see fit, yet it's obvious people with use them in unlawful ways. But people don't want to give up their freedom, regardless of who it might hurt. That's how I see it. Why you think I'm crazy is beyond me. You've already mind up your minds anyway, it doesn't matter what I say.
Only thing I see sticking from that list is the first one. The rest seem like a stretch.Burger said:
Zeal said:yeah for someone with autism. sorry, it's beyond idiotic.
PepsimanVsJoe said:What in the hell did I just walk into?
JADS said:Wait, aren't Marcan and Sven not living in the States?
charlequin said:Full release of all fail0verflow tools to date online.
I think this strategy may not have played out quite how Sony was hoping.
Subliminal said:Its not job loss.
Its the sickening fact that someone plays something for free that was made by sometimes hundreds of people all just trying to make a living for themselves.
Its theft and its disgusting.
expy said:Engadget is all of a sudden an expert on law enforcement.
Steve Youngblood said:I honestly know what you're getting at, but the fact of the matter is that the comparison is completely disingenuous given your own acknowledgment -- in one case we're talking about weapons that can easily kill people, and in the other we're talking about people potentially playing video games for free. Furthermore, if you want to generalize and break things down into neat little boxes, the types of people who are pro-gun regulation tend to be more liberal. What are liberals known for? Well, they're certainly not against civil liberties and for corporations, that's for sure.
But that aside, I suppose it was a pretty good question that necessitated deep thought to escape that clever "trying to catch people engaging in active hypocrisy" trap.
scorcho said:game developers livelihoods. much like an unborn child, you can't put a price on that.
Vinci said:And guess what? I'm not for piracy. No support of it whatsoever. The latest research on the subject states that its 1000 to 1 (ie. 1000 pirated copies equals 1 lost sale). If that's anywhere near true, piracy is not the reason why developers are struggling; they're struggling for legitimate market reasons.
So no, I don't find the potential for piracy a strong enough argument for restricting people's rights to do what they want with their property. Just as Sony is completely in their rights to ban the fuck out of anyone they like trying to use PSN, since that is Sony's property to do with as it pleases.
Steve Youngblood said:Who is losing their jobs because of this?
What's ignorant about wanting to allow people to use their expensive hardware to do things that the platform holder didn't explicitly sign off on? The fact that this in turn often makes piracy possible is beside the point.
captmcblack said:PS3 used to be open, because it was able to run Linux. That is one of the reasons it was compared to a PC, not to mention its other numerous features, ports and open format support.
They took that feature away.
We know how that went.
I have a relative who is also a lawyer, but I wouldn't trust him in defending me in court, I'd probably look for better hire elsewhere if need be... Pretty weak arguments 'against' those claims by SCEA, he should've at least stated why he thought they were weak.Burger said:Well, Nilay Patel is a lawyer.... so....
captmcblack said:If you're going to make that crazy gun analogy, what would "gun control" entail in this PS3/CFW context? Usually the "guns don't kill people, people do" point is made with regards to the NRA and/or gun control laws.
I'm actually curious here.
i surprisingly agree with this. it's accurate in every way.tinfoilhatman said:LOL at the haters in this thread, Sony F'd up BIGTIME blame them not the hacking\opensource\homebrew community. Then they just made themselves a larger target by removing Linux, NOW their making themselves even a BIGGER target by going after FailOverflow, good thinking Sony team just keep going further down the black rabbit hole.
Folks the fact is the proverbial genie is out of the bottle and no amount of lawsuits can stop the free flow of information on the internet, this has been proved time and time and time again the fact that some people fail to understand this is proof of how delusional some of you are.
Evoga said:I didn't think there was any piracy with the 3.55 cfw but just had a look and there seems to be an ever growing list of games modified to work. Even all the latest such as need for speed, god of war and call of duty have eboots available now.
Is this really the start of widespread piracy on the ps3?
If it is the no wonder Sony are going after them as the floodgates are open
Evoga said:I didn't think there was any piracy with the 3.55 cfw but just had a look and there seems to be an ever growing list of games modified to work. Even all the latest such as need for speed, god of war and call of duty have eboots available now.
Is this really the start of widespread piracy on the ps3?
If it is the no wonder Sony are going after them as the floodgates are open
The point isn't to completely stop the spread of all the tools and information, that's obviously impossible and they're well aware of that. But why not take down 1 or 2 individuals while you're at it? Seeing them get crushed to the lowest of lows... Why not?tinfoilhatman said:LOL at the haters in this thread, Sony F'd up BIGTIME blame them not the hacking\opensource\homebrew community. Then they just made themselves a larger target by removing Linux, NOW their making themselves even a BIGGER target by going after FailOverflow, good thinking Sony team just keep going further down the black rabbit hole.
Folks the fact is the proverbial genie is out of the bottle and no amount of lawsuits can stop the free flow of information on the internet, this has been proved time and time and time again the fact that some people fail to understand this is proof of how delusional some of you are.
Vinci said:Yes. It makes far more sense for Sony to open the floodgates wider by issuing a lawsuit.
expy said:I have a relative who is also a lawyer, but I wouldn't trust him in defending me in court, I'd probably look for better hire elsewhere if need be... Pretty weak arguments 'against' those claims by SCEA, he should've at least stated why he thought they were weak.