They did but not much. You just saw empty streets and one guy kill himself. I wish they showed more Canadians living in Canada.
They did but not much. You just saw empty streets and one guy kill himself. I wish they showed more Canadians living in Canada.
I like that Kyle's voice has been taken away. It's exactly what has been happening in the real world lately, people of reason just aren't being listened too. Also, those people of reason, when backed into a corner and forced into a way of thinking they don't actually value (AKA Kyle finally folding and committing to the statement "Caitlyn Jenner is a hero and is a beautiful person"), that is then held over them as a negative and they then have to shoulder the full weight of that.
They mostly moved to america buddy
The point was that almost all Canadians decided to all leave cause he got into power.
I like that Kyle's voice has been taken away. It's exactly what has been happening in the real world lately, people of reason just aren't being listened too. Also, those people of reason, when backed into a corner and forced into a way of thinking they don't actually value (AKA Kyle finally folding and committing to the statement "Caitlyn Jenner is a hero and is a beautiful person"), that is then held over them as a negative and they then have to shoulder the full weight of that.
Meh, seems like South Park's usual "both sides are bad" shtick.
I'm not sure what's wrong with satirizing both sides.
Meh, seems like South Park's usual "both sides are bad" shtick.
One of the things that I laughed at the most was the revelation with Butters finding out Canada doesn't have ice cream and is explained to what the world "sorry" means.
EDIT:
Charlotte - "Thanks, Butters! I'm sorry I didn't know what "ice cream" was."
Butters - "What's sorry?"
Charlotte - "Well that's what Canadians say to express remorse."
Butters - "Oh hey, that's neato!"
I am pretty sure that was just making fun of her accent. She was pronouncing it sowwy, which is how butters asked it as well, "what is sowwy" vs "what is sorry".
I can't get the canadian alphabet out of my head.
It's only bad to people who are convinced that their viewpoint is the only sane, rational viewpoint and anyone who differs even slightly is on the OTHER SIDE and are to be pitied, vilified, and ostracized.
really? I thought it was a joke about Americans not being apologetic at all.
And I like it that way.
I am pretty sure that was just making fun of her accent. She was pronouncing it sowwy, which is how butters asked it as well, "what is sowwy" vs "what is sorry".
Yeah, it was nothing to do with Americans being unapologetic. It was a simple accent jokeThat is definitely a joke about Butters not understanding the Canadian pronunciation of "Sorry" and him thinking its a new word.
Episode 2 was alright, social commentary on point but not always funny, the episode was better paced than the first though. Kyle getting shut down every time when he would attempt a speech was great. I do like that this season is using continuity like the last one.
I must be a moron because I thought Chuck Mangione was a fictional King of the Hill character.
I must be a moron because I thought Chuck Mangione was a fictional King of the Hill character.
BAHAHHAHAHAHAH
![]()
No its clear it was meant as a joke about Americans never being sorry otherwise butters would have said something like "oh you mean sorry/another word" instead of liking the idea of someone showing remorse as if it was a new concept to him.
Great episode. A lot better than last week.
Me too. And Whataburger, too.
Circle K is real too.
really? I thought it was a joke about Americans not being apologetic at all.
And I like it that way.
I think they do original stories when they think of one, but it's very hard to do that out of nothing. Current events give them topical fodder and a springboard to tell stories from. Using their current schedule it totally makes sense to do it this way.
I'm not sure what's wrong with satirizing both sides.
There isn't, but I just feel that a lot of these types of shows copout by playing "both sides are bad" card just so that they don't lose out with a part of the audience.
There isn't, but I just feel that a lot of these types of shows copout by playing "both sides are bad" card just so that they don't lose out with a part of the audience.
Look - Even if you're on the "side" that they are making fun of, you owe it to yourself still be removed from it enough to laugh it, and acknowledge that there is no side, that doesn't deserve to be made fun of or have no bad apples. That's just egomania. Them making fun of progressives and right-wings at the same time means nothing!
But that's not what they're doing here. They're not equating the two sides, they're showing that they create a feedback loop that makes things miserable for the people caught in the middle. Yes, they're showing that both sides have problems. But they're not making any equations here- you're the one doing that in your head.I don't give care if they make fun of the left or the right, it's just very annoying that it seems every topic they touch its like "okay this plot focuses mainly on making fun of these people for being stupid, but these people can be kind of stupid in a way too so let's make sure to put them in there an equal amount of time and show that they are both equal".
I don't give care if they make fun of the left or the right, it's just very annoying that it seems every topic they touch its like "okay this plot focuses mainly on making fun of these people for being stupid, but these people can be kind of stupid in a way too so let's make sure to put them in there an equal amount of time and show that they are both equal".
And this is the exact problem I have with South Park. It seems that every topic the show covers are two irrational opposing sides engaged in heated arguments while the rational voice of reason in the middle is always silenced because "both sides have their points."But that's not what they're doing here. They're not equating the two sides, they're showing that they create a feedback loop that makes things miserable for the people caught in the middle.
Our politics have gotten ridiculously polarized and its only getting worse.And this is the exact problem I have with South Park. It seems that every topic the show covers are two irrational opposing sides engaged in heated arguments while the rational voice of reason in the middle is always silenced because "both sides have their points."
Our politics have gotten ridiculously polarized and its only getting worse.
And this is the exact problem I have with South Park. It seems that every topic the show covers are two irrational opposing sides engaged in heated arguments while the rational voice of reason in the middle is always silenced because "both sides have their points."
And? Does that mean that every single issue's answer is in the middle? Is a specific issue so polarized because both sides have moved far to the poles of their specific spectrum or could it be mostly one side doing the marching? Things aren't always as simple as "both sides are bad, so lets look in the middle", and that is overwhelmingly the message South Park brings with most of the topics they cover.