• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Spider-Man: Homecoming |OT| MCU's Sweet 16 - SPOILERS

Based on her character in this movie, it would be a relatively out of character thing for her to say

That's why I don't think it will happen, at least not in the cliche way everyone's thinking. Until the movie was over, I didn't realize just how fucking glad I was that they didn't make her go through some glow up for Homecoming, where she stuns Peter and ends up being Peter's date, much less saying the line.

Their interpretation of MJ is extremely interesting to me, can't wait to see where it goes.

"Face it loser, you've hit rock bottom."

Heh

She'll say it, but it'll be in like an awkward sort of way based on this character.

Maybe, I'd be fine with something like that.

EDIT: Heavy sarcasm also works.
 
I thought it was fantastic that Homecoming didn't repeat the same mistake as BvS and waste time showing the hero's origin.
 
Uncle Ben
edict Cumberpatch

Benedict_Cumberbatch_as_Doctor_Strange.jpg


Then we get the Mystical Spider-Man
 
Hence, 'schrodinger's character'. It lets them try doing something different, and depending on the response, adjust plans accordingly.

Now, as to why this iteration of MJ is so detached in terms of setup, appearance, tone, etc, I can't really say. My initial reaction is that oh, they want to go a less traditional route of building up their relationship. Except... that's technically what happened in the Sam Raimi movies, what with her knowing him since childhood and all and him crushing on her the whole time. Meanwhile, even though their ethnicities and precise personas are different, Flash and Liz are framed in their otherwise traditional roles for the franchise - bully and first crush respectively. Plus as you say, MJ doesn't appear that much, and certainly doesn't have much specific interaction with Peter outside of the one line about her being obsessed over him for... whatever reason, and the zinger at lunch.

So yeah, not sure what they're going for, much as I like the film's iteration within itself.


It really bummed me out that Zendaya is MJ - not because of her ethnicity but as you said they have completely changed her role. I was hoping we would get a more classic take on Pete and his supporting cast.
A good version of the Gwen/MJ/Pete story but doubt we will get that now.

Have no issues with Flash or Liz.
Ned was wonderful in the film but I hope his real name is Ganke and he just chooses to go by Ned. Also makes me wonder what they will do with Harry and Norman... I hope they introduce Harry at least in the next film and only get to the Goblin stuff around the 5th film. I have a feeling the Osborns will be back too.
 
Or it's just complete coincidence because they even frame shots like the Ferris Bueller and tent scene. Heck, him walking into the bank is really weird..

... Are you serious? What do either of those things have to do with Deadpool?

And you still ignored the fact that Deadpool's personality is an extreme version of Spider-Man. What you're saying is simply wrong unless you don't know about the characters from the comics.
 
Holy shit this movie was amazing, easily one of the best Spider Man movies out there!

Is it better than Spider Man 2? Not sure, but I loved it as a Spider Man film a lot!
 
The montage of him on the streets in the early part of the movie shows us what he's been doing all this time, and half of the time he gets it wrong. He's stopping small time crooks, saving people from accidents, mistaking people for crooks, and helping people on the street. The ATM robbery is the first time he's ever seen or tackled anything like alien weapons. Shocker is the first "super"villain he has ever fought, followed closely by Vulture. They actually do make this of all things fairly clear, I think.
It's clear if they been selling weapons and Spidermans been doing it for maybe 8 months by the start of the movie he ain't did shit but make web in terms of usefulness. Most of his time would have been boredom and finding out what he can stick to


Also the Community Glee Club joke
DG's cousin will obviously be Miles
 
For people bemoaning how we haven't seen Uncle Ben are forgetting that this is the third Spider-Man reboot meaning that we and other people have seen the whole Spider-Man origin story twice, we don't need to see it a third time and have it drag down the movie.

People want Ben to be alive? Yall haven't seen ASM 2?

Urgh, I hated how Peter was like "I need to track down Uncle Ben killer" then promptly forgot about later in the movie and was more interested in his parents in Amazing Spider-Man 2.

Sony clearly had no idea what they were doing with the Amazing Spider-Man movies, oh well Amazing Spider-Man 2 under preforming was a blessing as it lead to Spider-Man being in the MCU...just gotta hope that they keep their hands to themselves and don't mess up a good thing and cancel all future plans of foolishly creating a Spider-Man cinematic universe.

There's 0 chance of touching Gwen after she was the one good part of ASM1/2.

That's what frustrates me as Gwen was wasted in the Amazing Spider-Man movies, especially her death as for some stupid reason Sony tried to absolve Peter the blame of her death completely missing the impact that her death had on Peter.

I wonder if Mary-Jane will be in Homecoming as she was barely a character in Raimi movies and more of a glorified damsel in distress for three movie straight.
 
And yes, I did like the action scenes quite a bit, maybe not the best overall in a Spider Man, but normally well done for the most part and pretty funny often.
 
And yes, I did like the action scenes quite a bit, maybe not the best overall in a Spider Man, but normally well done for the most part and pretty funny often.

They were tense and exciting while also showing some restraint - it's tough to make interesting fights when you hero isn't actually that good at fighting yet.

I loved seeing Vulture fight off Peter like an actual bird defending its nest at the end.

I really liked the soundtrack during the final fight on the plane, as well as the neon visuals of the malfunctioning cloaking.

Yeah it was cool when Toomes realized Peter was there when the cloaking cameras caught him and reflected his image across the plane.
 
This movie was a LOT of fun. Tough to where to rank among the Spidey movies, but it's definitely way up there.

I will say this. The movie, by far, more than any other Spidey movie, does a GREAT job of conveying Peter being a teenager, and what would happen if a teenager in his shoes got super powers.
 
2nd best Spidey film, just a lot more fun than Tobey's first film. But it's not on Spider-Man 2 level.

Was that Tom Hardy in an uncredited role as the henchman who threatened to go public with news of who Keaton's character was?

I lost it at the "you should kiss her" line as Spidey is hanging upside down in the elevator. Nice nod to the first Spidey film.

I don't like that Zendaya doesn't have a last name. One name only stars always bothered me. But I love this version of MJ.

I should've seen the Liz is The Vulture's daughter coming a mile away, but it threw me off cause I didn't think she was mixed.

And that 2nd post credits Captain America troll was glorious.
 
I liked the movie, it got the characterization down really great. However it felt unfocused, for example, MJ/Michelle served no purpose at all, she didn't drive the plot forward and she didn't effect Peter in any way either. While I didn't mind her inclusion it didn't have any payoff whatsoever. Flash had a similarly small role but served a purpose by showing us that Peter is not that much of a popular guy in school.
 
This movie was easily better than Spiderman 2 for me, which I rewatched a few days ago in order to be sure. Even the one thing I thought Spiderman 2 would have over it, the villain, is up for debate for me now lol
 
I really enjoyed watching this in 2D IMAX. I don't think I ever saw a MCU movie at my real-IMAX theater in 2D, they were all 3D.
 
This movie was easily better than Spiderman 2 for me, which I rewatched a few days ago in order to be sure. Even the one thing I thought Spiderman 2 would have over it, the villain, is up for debate for me now lol

Keaton fucking blew Molina out of the water. No contest.
 
Speaking of Michelle, can someone explain that to me? The wink at the end by saying she is MJ? Is she post to be alternate version of Mary Jane, or something? Or is she just a different character who is also called MJ?
 
Speaking of Michelle, can someone explain that to me? The wink at the end by saying she is MJ? Is she post to be alternate version of Mary Jane, or something? Or is she just a different character who is called MJ?

She's actually a serial killer and will become the new Carnage.



lol
 
Speaking of Michelle, can someone explain that to me? The wink at the end by saying she is MJ? Is she post to be alternate version of Mary Jane, or something? Or is she just a different character who is called MJ?

Her name is Michelle Jones. She is the MCU version of "MJ." She's not Mary Jane Watson.
 
The suit being so "Stark-techy" in this didn't bother me because a) it gives this version of the character a concrete connection to the rest of the MCU and b) the scene with him and Ned turning the training wheels protocols off/Peter finding and removing the tracker opens up some cool ideas.

It seeds the idea that Peter isn't scared to crack the suit open and tinker with it, and after showing him being overwhelmed with the amount of webbing options available to him, I bet he'll have used his smarts to customize it pretty extensively in the next film, making it much more "his".
 
In regards to Uncle Ben, I just assume he's dead, and enough time has passed since his death to get passed the grieving stage.

In either case, much like the Wayne parents, I don't ever need to see Uncle Ben die again.
 
Yeah, the new headquarters is definitely Tony's team. I'm just pretty sure they had moved some of the headquarters someplace at the outsides of New York during Ant-Man too, where Falcon has his fight with Ant-Man.

Btw, I'm was pretty disappointed they killed off the first Shocker. He was so perfect in the role, but I'm not against the second Shocker either. The first one just had more charisma that's all.


Well, I won't mind if they continue on making her this tomboy rendition of the character. But then I want her to be this cool and close friend to Peter and Ned doing all the dry one-liners.

Zendaya herself just really lends herself to playing a model since she's one for real too.
Do you know what tomboy is? Or are we in the 90's
 
The montage of him on the streets in the early part of the movie shows us what he's been doing all this time, and half of the time he gets it wrong. He's stopping small time crooks, saving people from accidents, mistaking people for crooks, and helping people on the street. The ATM robbery is the first time he's ever seen or tackled anything like alien weapons. Shocker is the first "super"villain he has ever fought, followed closely by Vulture. They actually do make this of all things fairly clear, I think.

Him getting it wrong isn't the issue, it's him stopping when his suit is taken away when he's been doing it -- and he should know not all are wins. It's poorly telegraphed because you have to display failure pretty well but they do not. These movies need a dramatic weight or else it's very hard to thematically understand. This is why Uncle Ben works really well because he's a recognizable catalyst for change in Peter. When Peter in Homecoming loses his suit you're left wondering, "just what exactly occurred to make him so down?" The logical answer was Tony scolded him but that needs to be batted home to work. It didn't here because there's really no weight to "people could have died (but didn't thanks to my magic machines)".

It could be argued it's due to him wanting to be grown up and him wrestling with it but that is shallow as well. I use shallow because its to define simple. Simple is easy. You can say "A obviously leads to B" and that's it. You just need to make the connection and for lots of people it works. That's fine but that's all it will ever be is fine because things can be undeveloped, not involved, unearned, or whatever term wants to be used to describe something that could be better but wasn't.

The movie is clear but it's done in a pretty bare bones way.

... Are you serious? What do either of those things have to do with Deadpool?

And you still ignored the fact that Deadpool's personality is an extreme version of Spider-Man. What you're saying is simply wrong unless you don't know about the characters from the comics.
It's the way their shot (linger, parallel to other acts for comedy, the general silliness to his approaches). You can say Deadpool is an amped up version but it's still shot this way. This isn't a slant against the film, it just reminds me of it. Don't know why you believe it's bad for it to remind me of Deadpool.
 
Top Bottom