• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

SPOILER Bioshock Infinite SPOILER discussion

remz

Member
what if the guy dead in the lighthouse with a bag on his head is a failed dead booker from another time line.



the last chance line on the note from the lighthouse door is pretty funny considering how many times you go through there
 
What's really interesting is that they announced "Infinite" years ago. We just accepted it as the tagline to the game, but its impact doesn't really kick in until you hit the last half-hour of the game, and then hit "new game."
 
Do we know what point in time Booker and Elizabeth went to Rapture? It might be interesting to revisit BioShock and BioShock 2 to see if there are any Infinite Easter Eggs, you know, similar to the Destiny teases back in Halo 3: ODST.

I'm honestly really interested in hearing how far Levine planned this, because the line Booker says about the stars in the Rapture-verse could either be filling in the blanks or that's just how it was written.
 

remz

Member
What's really interesting is that they announced "Infinite" years ago. We just accepted it as the tagline to the game, but its impact doesn't really kick in until you hit the last half-hour of the game, and then hit "new game."

yeah even the wya the logo animates looks like it's looping over and over and in time.
 

Guess Who

Banned
I'm honestly really interested in hearing how far Levine planned this, because the line Booker says about the stars in the Rapture-verse could either be filling in the blanks or that's just how it was written.

From all the interviews and whatnot I've seen with Ken, the idea for Infinite didn't come about until after Bioshock 1 was shipped.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
What I'm interesting in knowing is how Comstock's crew knew "The false prophet" (aka Booker) was coming, and they had the exact A.D tattoo printed on posters as a warning sign for the false prophet.

How did they know that ?

Booker remarks at one point whether it was the same people who hired him (Lucete's) who informed Comstock, but that doesn't make sense, why would they ?
 
What I'm interesting in knowing is how Comstock's crew knew "The false prophet" (aka Booker) was coming, and they had the exact A.D tattoo printed on posters as a warning sign for the false prophet.

How did they know that ?

Booker remarks at one point whether it was the same people who hired him (Lucete's) who informed Comstock, but that doesn't make sense, why would they ?

Because it's happened before. At some point, "Comstock" knew of "Anna Dewitt" and knew of his/Booker's attempt to save her.

Everything happens in and of itself. The entire world is self-aware of the past, the present, and the future.
 

Guess Who

Banned
What I'm interesting in knowing is how Comstock's crew knew "The false prophet" (aka Booker) was coming, and they had the exact A.D tattoo printed on posters as a warning sign for the false prophet.

How did they know that ?

Same way they have music and technology from the future - observing it through tears.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Because it's happened before. At some point, "Comstock" knew of "Anna Dewitt" and knew of his/Booker's attempt to save her.

Everything happens in and of itself. The entire world is self-aware of the past, the present, and the future.

Then it's a real bummer of an infinite loop. Booker/Comstock always die at the hands of either themselves or their own daughter, and the timeline repeats itself.

I did start the game once again and the opening section on the boat, all the things the Lucete's say about "repeating the experiment" and the brain making new memories etc, it just fits so well with the theme and how the game ends.

They might as well call this the last Bioshock game ever and it'd be Ok.

Same way they have music and technology from the future - observing it through tears.

I don't buy that theory, "regular" people can only HEAR things through the tears, and catch very small glimpses. Booker's tattoo, his entire motive is a very specific thing to be casually observed through a random tear by an untrained eye.
 
It really is beautiful.

A doomed fairy tale.

Like if Sleeping Beauty never woke up and the Prince really did die of old age because of Maleficent. Like he went senile and just made up the "real" ending to the film.
 
But the real beauty comes from starting a new game, and realizing that everything plays out all over again. Listen to the Lutece's dialogue in the boat, and then look at all of the hints that Booker is simply repeating everything.

Yup, the heads or tails part basically reinforces this.
 

SGRemy

Member
Something that probably fucked me up more than the time travel alternate dimension stuff.....totally thought booker and Liz were gonna be a thing....until the end....was almost very 'Oldboy'
 
Yup, the heads or tails part basically reinforces this.

I'm about five hours into my second playthrough and I've been taking notes the whole time. I plan on writing and perhaps filming an analysis of infinite at some point.

This is basically like the last video game I ever need to play.
 

Guess Who

Banned
I don't buy that theory, "regular" people can only HEAR things through the tears, and catch very small glimpses. Booker's tattoo, his entire motive is a very specific thing to be casually observed through a random tear by an untrained eye.

I don't think Comstock was a regular person - he was clearly being helped by the Luteces to some extent, the way I figure it they helped him utilize tears and this was the source of his "prophecy".
 
I don't think Comstock was a regular person - he was clearly being helped by the Luteces to some extent, the way I figure it they helped him utilize tears and this was the source of his "prophecy".

A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel.

This could also be an allusion to Booker's "rebirth" after having been drowned/baptized by his daughter. A near-death experience, perhaps.
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
So if the Luteces can see the future, does the outcome of the game basically render them as a pair of assholes who just like watching events unfold, and mildly intervening in scenarios just to give all of the different Bookers and Elizabeths just enough help to get them to the next stage? In fact, does anything explain how they are bringing themselves into different universes?

Also, can we talk about what would have happened if Elizabeth never brought them both into the first tear, where Chen was alive?


edit: sorry I keep calling them the lettuce twins, bad typos
 

iMax

Member
A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel..

What if the arch-angel was the manifestation of Lady Comstock generated from Elizabeth's hatred, from an alternate reality?
Shit, I think I just mindfucked myself.
 

Ridesh

Banned
Or is the Booker as Comstock timeline the one where the motorized patriots are Lincoln instead of Washington? Can this part be explained

That's because those are the Motorized Patriots of the Vox Populi.

The only thing about the ending that I cannot make sense of, is Rapture. I'm not so convinced by the "lighthouse, man, city" thing, that was pure fanservice to me, but great fanservice tho, my jaw hit the floor.
 
I don't think Comstock was a regular person - he was clearly being helped by the Luteces to some extent, the way I figure it they helped him utilize tears and this was the source of his "prophecy".

Remember tears aren't just alternate timelines they're alternate timelines that can take place at different time periods. Comstock simply got a glimpse into a timeline that was in the future and played off it. Comstock thought he was seeing the future of his timeline, but it was the possible future of another timeline.
 

iMax

Member
So if the Luteces can see the future, does the outcome of the game basically render them as a pair of assholes who just like watching events unfold, and mildly intervening in scenarios just to give all of the different Bookers and Elizabeths just enough help to get them to the next stage? In fact, does anything explain how they are bringing themselves into different universes?

Also, can we talk about what would have happened if Elizabeth never brought them both into the first tear, where Chen was alive?


edit: sorry I keep calling them the lettuce twins, bad typos

Hahaha this is sounding more and more like Fringe.
 

iMax

Member
That's because those are the Motorized Patriots of the Vox Populi.

The only thing about the ending that I cannot make sense of, is Rapture. I'm not so convinced by the "lighthouse, man, city" thing, that was pure fanservice to me, but great fanservice tho, my jaw hit the floor.

Wasn't it just a co-incidental tear located at the point Songbird was attacking the statue? Could've been anywhere, I guess.
 
But then... Booker just repeats the whole thing.

He doesn't learn.

So, perhaps, this is Booker's final "version" of "Infinite"?

His hell, his limbo? Pushing the stone up the eternal mountain?
 
Because it's happened before. At some point, "Comstock" knew of "Anna Dewitt" and knew of his/Booker's attempt to save her.

Everything happens in and of itself. The entire world is self-aware of the past, the present, and the future.

In recordings they say Comstock didn't understand the tears, and thought they told the absolute future. In truth they showed only probable outcomes, due to the nature of timeline divergence.
 
In recordings they say Comstock didn't understand the tears, and thought they told the absolute future. In truth they showed only probable outcomes, due to the nature of timeline divergence.

He was perhaps deluded then?

I need to track down the last ~30 of the voxophone tapes I missed. :/
 

Horse Detective

Why the long case?
I think to a degree, the game feels replay able, but not in the sense that the ending is the same. I would feel better if there was a course of actions that could be taken that yield a more lively ending.

Since there isn't, it's like Booker is stuck in an "infinite" hell.
 
I have almost all of them, I'm going to go through another playthrough probably on easy so I can spend more time looking for stuff than fighting.
 

Ridesh

Banned
Wasn't it just a co-incidental tear located at the point Songbird was attacking the statue? Could've been anywhere, I guess.

Yes, of course, but I mean the relation between Rapture (BioShock) and Infinite's story that they tried to make with the "lighthouse, man, city" thing.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel.

This could also be an allusion to Booker's "rebirth" after having been drowned/baptized by his daughter. A near-death experience, perhaps.

Comstock/Booker may have had some level of cognitive/prophetic power in reality too. Booker DID see a vision of new york under attack before coming into contact with Elizabeth, when he enters Colombia for the first time.



But then... Booker just repeats the whole thing.

He doesn't learn.

So, perhaps, this is Booker's final "version" of "Infinite"?

His hell, his limbo? Pushing the stone up the eternal mountain?

And suddenly Bioshock : INFINITE makes a hell of a lot more sense.

Wasn't it just a co-incidental tear located at the point Songbird was attacking the statue? Could've been anywhere, I guess.

I believe at that point Elizabeth has basically attained the power to CREATE tears when ever she wants to, which is something she claims to have been able to do before the tower started to syphon away her power.

She just created the tear out of nothingness, how/why she chose Rapture is a mystery. Maybe what we (the gamer) perceive as RAPTURE, was just a gateway, a nexus, to the "Sea of gates".
 

Yeef

Member
Can someone link me to a place to read about the ending because I feel retarded for not understanding a single second of that.
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/605052-bioshock-infinite/65798681

So if the Luteces can see the future, does the outcome of the game basically render them as a pair of assholes who just like watching events unfold, and mildly intervening in scenarios just to give all of the different Bookers and Elizabeths just enough help to get them to the next stage? In fact, does anything explain how they are bringing themselves into different universes?

Also, can we talk about what would have happened if Elizabeth never brought them both into the first tear, where Chen was alive?


edit: sorry I keep calling them the lettuce twins, bad typos
The female Lutece found her 'brother' (who's an alternate reality version of herself) and brought him into her own universe. Using the same technology, Comstock uses tears to see the future and become a "prophet." (This is also how he knows Dewitt is coming). Lutece bringing her brother into her universe and otherwise messing with the multiverse causes all sorts of crazy metaphysical issues. Her brother gives her an ultimatum to either fix the problem she caused or he would leave her forever. Realizing that, either way, she'll be separated from him forever, she decides to attempt to fix things to make him happy. Bringing DeWitt into DeWitt into the Colombia timeline is how she sets that all in motion.

After the credits, you see DeWitt check Anna's crib, theoretically because, with the multiverse fixed, she never gets kidnapped and never becomes Elizabeth, since Lutece never comes to buy her.
 
I think to a degree, the game feels replay able, but not in the sense that the ending is the same. I would feel better if there was a course of actions that could be taken that yield a more lively ending.

Since there isn't, it's like Booker is stuck in an "infinite" hell.

But that's the beauty of it.

We witness a man going through his own personal hell. Over and over.

The quote at the beginning of the game says

"The mind of the subject will desperately struggle to create memories where none exist..." - R. Lutece

Either Booker is in a PTSD coma and he's trying to break free, or he's locked in a permanent treadmill wheel of memories of regret and sadness that he's trying desperately to fix, but can't.

Remember that every "flashback" memory he has is in his office. There are empty beer and wine bottles, cigarette packs, and notes scattered on his desk.

He's the failed detective who can't even get his own daughter back. He keeps searching but never finding. He fucked up royally with himself/Comstock and the Luteces (who might not even be real).

It's like Memento. He keeps creating riddles to solve but he never makes up the answers.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Remember that every "flashback" memory he has is in his office. There are empty beer and wine bottles, cigarette packs, and notes scattered on his desk.

scratched lottery tickets too.. which I thought was a really nice touch.

The guy is shown to be REALLY out of it.
 

Metroidvania

People called Romanes they go the house?
But then... Booker just repeats the whole thing.

He doesn't learn.

So, perhaps, this is Booker's final "version" of "Infinite"?

His hell, his limbo? Pushing the stone up the eternal mountain?

To me, I don't think it's the same Booker repeating things over and over.

It's each seperate universe's booker, as evidenced by making different (albeit small and inconsequential/limited in terms of changing narrative/gameplay that we see) choices along the way, distinguishing the universe and separating it from any other universe by the choices he makes.

Basically, the way I see it, all of the multiverse's Bookers reach some semblance of convergence upon reaching the ending sequence, which is why multiple versions of Liz show up (and are drowning ALL of the Bookers), and this converging point is what allows Liz to 'negate' the baptism event and return the timeline to where Comstock never existed, hence Booker never sold Anna, hence the post-epilogue scene.
 

Guess Who

Banned
The quote at the beginning of the game says

Pretty sure that quote is referencing how the Luteces removed Booker's memories of selling Anna when they dragged him into Comstock's universe/timeline, and his mind conjures up the story about how he has to rescue Elizabeth to pay off his debts.
 
Holy fuck...

What if the entire game is made up.

In Booker's mind? He's just a failed ex-Pinkerton/war-vet who's out of work and decides to make up the ultimate un-crackable story?


Jesus... I don't know if I want to go down that path.
 
To me, I don't think it's the same Booker repeating things over and over.

It's each seperate universe's booker, as evidenced by making different (albeit small and inconsequential/limited in terms of changing narrative/gameplay that we see) choices along the way, distinguishing the universe and separating it from any other universe by the choices he makes.

Basically, the way I see it, all of the multiverse's Bookers reach some semblance of convergence upon reaching the ending sequence, which is why multiple versions of Liz show up, and this converging point is what allows Liz to 'negate' the baptism event and return the timeline to where Comstock never existed, hence Booker never sold Anna, hence the post-epilogue scene.


But when do they remove Booker's memory? The scene shows the two Lutece twins (already in their yellow raincoats) picking him up. For all intents and purposes he was lying on the shore of Maine, after being "baptized", and they took him and put him (back) in the boat. The multiple versions of Elizabeth are simply the results of the multiple times he's tried to save her. They all take on a slightly different variation. He's "saved" all of them, but they all drown him in the end.
 

Guess Who

Banned
But when do they remove Booker's memory? The scene shows the two Lutece twins (already in their yellow raincoats) picking him up. For all intents and purposes he was lying on the shore of Maine, after being "baptized", and they took him and put him (back) in the boat.

I don't think they explicitly say that his memory is removed, but their dialogue in that scene certainly says that Booker doesn't remember what's happened (which I took as - doesn't remember that he sold his daughter Anna to pay off his debts) and his mind is coming up with new memories to fill their place (that he is, instead, needing to bring back Elizabeth to pay off his debts).
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
^

it's also possible that in one such instance he finds himself on a plane, instead of a boat, with a box that states "would you kindly open this after the plane reaches a certain set of coordinates" .. and he thinks to himself "They told me .. Son... you're special. You were born to do great things." And you know what? They were right. before opening the box.

imagine that huh ..
 
I don't think they explicitly say that his memory is removed, but their dialogue in that scene certainly says that Booker doesn't remember what's happened (which I took as - doesn't remember that he sold his daughter Anna to pay off his debts) and his mind is coming up with new memories to fill their place (that he is, instead, needing to bring back Elizabeth to pay off his debts).

Here's another thing. The "debt."

It's never explicitally mentioned. What it is, who he owes it to.

The only actual verbal reference comes when Lutece says, "Your debt to Mr./Father Comstock is absolved."

He owed a debt to Comstock/himself?

I can only think of the "loop" theory.

He destroyed Columbia, that which he created, to save his own daughter. So he must "build" it again (Comstock's "arch-angel" story) only to save his daughter/"the girl" from himself/Comstock.

The whole thing fucking loops.

I'm telling you.

It's like chicken and egg.


I'm a little drunk.

I need to speak to Ken.
 

DatDude

Banned
But that's the beauty of it.

We witness a man going through his own personal hell. Over and over.

The quote at the beginning of the game says



Either Booker is in a PTSD coma and he's trying to break free, or he's locked in a permanent treadmill wheel of memories of regret and sadness that he's trying desperately to fix, but can't.

Remember that every "flashback" memory he has is in his office. There are empty beer and wine bottles, cigarette packs, and notes scattered on his desk.

He's the failed detective who can't even get his own daughter back. He keeps searching but never finding. He fucked up royally with himself/Comstock and the Luteces (who might not even be real).

It's like Memento. He keeps creating riddles to solve but he never makes up the answers.

Yup that's what I love about it to.

People might go "BAH, this makes Infinite a pointless game"

But I just think there's something so, emotionally "heavy", about a guy forever being stuck in an infinite loop, forever destined to repeat the same mistakes over and over and over and over and over and over.

There's just something, so...I don't know..like...damn. Made me really think about life in some weird way.

I applaud Levine for this ending. It took balls, and paid off.
 

Vire

Member
I just beat it and I'm super confused...

I don't really even know where to begin to be honest. Could someone give a rundown in real simple terms of the final 10 minutes or so?
 
A very dense philosophical story with this one, and I fucking loved it. Tackled a lot of interesting issues. I was floored once the ending sequence started up, and by the end couldn't help but think back to all the cues.

I did have a hunch that Comstock = DeWitt just before the face-to-face encounter (when Comstock chimes in over intercom about Booker not seeming "quite right"). But I let go of the thought until later on.

The atmosphere/visual style was so fucking beautiful laced with symbolism, I loved it. Levine is a master storyteller in games.
 
Here's another thing. The "debt."

It's never explicitally mentioned. What it is, who he owes it to.

The only actual verbal reference comes when Lutece says, "Your debt to Mr./Father Comstock is absolved."

He owed a debt to Comstock/himself?

I can only think of the "loop" theory.

He destroyed Columbia, that which he created, to save his own daughter. So he must "build" it again (Comstock's "arch-angel" story) only to save his daughter/"the girl" from himself/Comstock.

The whole thing fucking loops.

I'm telling you.

It's like chicken and egg.


I'm a little drunk.

I need to speak to Ken.

Well they do state it's a gambling debt. Gambling could me he took a gamble to change things, who knows.
 

DatDude

Banned
I just beat it and I'm super confused...

I don't really even know where to begin to be honest. Could someone give a rundown in real simple terms of the final 10 minutes or so?

Just make a list perhaps of your questions. Will be happy to answer them :)
 

DatDude

Banned
I think more proof can be just seen in the way the Luteces converse

"Does He Row? No he doesn't row"

As if they've seen this play out before...sorry if this was already brought up...but more evidence of the infinite loop theory.
 
Top Bottom