What the shit is that? o.0
A part of our childhoods we wish could be erased.
Preferably drowned in a fountain.
What the shit is that? o.0
Do we know what point in time Booker and Elizabeth went to Rapture? It might be interesting to revisit BioShock and BioShock 2 to see if there are any Infinite Easter Eggs, you know, similar to the Destiny teases back in Halo 3: ODST.
What's really interesting is that they announced "Infinite" years ago. We just accepted it as the tagline to the game, but its impact doesn't really kick in until you hit the last half-hour of the game, and then hit "new game."
It's from Lutece. Her/his name is on the card.
That's one way to justify not including a New Game + mode.
I'm honestly really interested in hearing how far Levine planned this, because the line Booker says about the stars in the Rapture-verse could either be filling in the blanks or that's just how it was written.
What I'm interesting in knowing is how Comstock's crew knew "The false prophet" (aka Booker) was coming, and they had the exact A.D tattoo printed on posters as a warning sign for the false prophet.
How did they know that ?
Booker remarks at one point whether it was the same people who hired him (Lucete's) who informed Comstock, but that doesn't make sense, why would they ?
What I'm interesting in knowing is how Comstock's crew knew "The false prophet" (aka Booker) was coming, and they had the exact A.D tattoo printed on posters as a warning sign for the false prophet.
How did they know that ?
Because it's happened before. At some point, "Comstock" knew of "Anna Dewitt" and knew of his/Booker's attempt to save her.
Everything happens in and of itself. The entire world is self-aware of the past, the present, and the future.
Same way they have music and technology from the future - observing it through tears.
But the real beauty comes from starting a new game, and realizing that everything plays out all over again. Listen to the Lutece's dialogue in the boat, and then look at all of the hints that Booker is simply repeating everything.
Yup, the heads or tails part basically reinforces this.
I don't buy that theory, "regular" people can only HEAR things through the tears, and catch very small glimpses. Booker's tattoo, his entire motive is a very specific thing to be casually observed through a random tear by an untrained eye.
I don't think Comstock was a regular person - he was clearly being helped by the Luteces to some extent, the way I figure it they helped him utilize tears and this was the source of his "prophecy".
A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel..
Or is the Booker as Comstock timeline the one where the motorized patriots are Lincoln instead of Washington? Can this part be explained
I don't think Comstock was a regular person - he was clearly being helped by the Luteces to some extent, the way I figure it they helped him utilize tears and this was the source of his "prophecy".
So if the Luteces can see the future, does the outcome of the game basically render them as a pair of assholes who just like watching events unfold, and mildly intervening in scenarios just to give all of the different Bookers and Elizabeths just enough help to get them to the next stage? In fact, does anything explain how they are bringing themselves into different universes?
Also, can we talk about what would have happened if Elizabeth never brought them both into the first tear, where Chen was alive?
edit: sorry I keep calling them the lettuce twins, bad typos
A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel.
This could also be an allusion to Booker's "rebirth" after having been drowned/baptized by his daughter. A near-death experience, perhaps.
That's because those are the Motorized Patriots of the Vox Populi.
The only thing about the ending that I cannot make sense of, is Rapture. I'm not so convinced by the "lighthouse, man, city" thing, that was pure fanservice to me, but great fanservice tho, my jaw hit the floor.
Because it's happened before. At some point, "Comstock" knew of "Anna Dewitt" and knew of his/Booker's attempt to save her.
Everything happens in and of itself. The entire world is self-aware of the past, the present, and the future.
In recordings they say Comstock didn't understand the tears, and thought they told the absolute future. In truth they showed only probable outcomes, due to the nature of timeline divergence.
He was perhaps deluded then?
I need to track down the last ~30 of the voxophone tapes I missed. :/
Wasn't it just a co-incidental tear located at the point Songbird was attacking the statue? Could've been anywhere, I guess.
A big mystery of Comstock's background is if he was indeed actually "visited" by an arch-angel.
This could also be an allusion to Booker's "rebirth" after having been drowned/baptized by his daughter. A near-death experience, perhaps.
But then... Booker just repeats the whole thing.
He doesn't learn.
So, perhaps, this is Booker's final "version" of "Infinite"?
His hell, his limbo? Pushing the stone up the eternal mountain?
Wasn't it just a co-incidental tear located at the point Songbird was attacking the statue? Could've been anywhere, I guess.
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/605052-bioshock-infinite/65798681Can someone link me to a place to read about the ending because I feel retarded for not understanding a single second of that.
The female Lutece found her 'brother' (who's an alternate reality version of herself) and brought him into her own universe. Using the same technology, Comstock uses tears to see the future and become a "prophet." (This is also how he knows Dewitt is coming). Lutece bringing her brother into her universe and otherwise messing with the multiverse causes all sorts of crazy metaphysical issues. Her brother gives her an ultimatum to either fix the problem she caused or he would leave her forever. Realizing that, either way, she'll be separated from him forever, she decides to attempt to fix things to make him happy. Bringing DeWitt into DeWitt into the Colombia timeline is how she sets that all in motion.So if the Luteces can see the future, does the outcome of the game basically render them as a pair of assholes who just like watching events unfold, and mildly intervening in scenarios just to give all of the different Bookers and Elizabeths just enough help to get them to the next stage? In fact, does anything explain how they are bringing themselves into different universes?
Also, can we talk about what would have happened if Elizabeth never brought them both into the first tear, where Chen was alive?
edit: sorry I keep calling them the lettuce twins, bad typos
I think to a degree, the game feels replay able, but not in the sense that the ending is the same. I would feel better if there was a course of actions that could be taken that yield a more lively ending.
Since there isn't, it's like Booker is stuck in an "infinite" hell.
"The mind of the subject will desperately struggle to create memories where none exist..." - R. Lutece
Remember that every "flashback" memory he has is in his office. There are empty beer and wine bottles, cigarette packs, and notes scattered on his desk.
But then... Booker just repeats the whole thing.
He doesn't learn.
So, perhaps, this is Booker's final "version" of "Infinite"?
His hell, his limbo? Pushing the stone up the eternal mountain?
The quote at the beginning of the game says
To me, I don't think it's the same Booker repeating things over and over.
It's each seperate universe's booker, as evidenced by making different (albeit small and inconsequential/limited in terms of changing narrative/gameplay that we see) choices along the way, distinguishing the universe and separating it from any other universe by the choices he makes.
Basically, the way I see it, all of the multiverse's Bookers reach some semblance of convergence upon reaching the ending sequence, which is why multiple versions of Liz show up, and this converging point is what allows Liz to 'negate' the baptism event and return the timeline to where Comstock never existed, hence Booker never sold Anna, hence the post-epilogue scene.
But when do they remove Booker's memory? The scene shows the two Lutece twins (already in their yellow raincoats) picking him up. For all intents and purposes he was lying on the shore of Maine, after being "baptized", and they took him and put him (back) in the boat.
I don't think they explicitly say that his memory is removed, but their dialogue in that scene certainly says that Booker doesn't remember what's happened (which I took as - doesn't remember that he sold his daughter Anna to pay off his debts) and his mind is coming up with new memories to fill their place (that he is, instead, needing to bring back Elizabeth to pay off his debts).
But that's the beauty of it.
We witness a man going through his own personal hell. Over and over.
The quote at the beginning of the game says
Either Booker is in a PTSD coma and he's trying to break free, or he's locked in a permanent treadmill wheel of memories of regret and sadness that he's trying desperately to fix, but can't.
Remember that every "flashback" memory he has is in his office. There are empty beer and wine bottles, cigarette packs, and notes scattered on his desk.
He's the failed detective who can't even get his own daughter back. He keeps searching but never finding. He fucked up royally with himself/Comstock and the Luteces (who might not even be real).
It's like Memento. He keeps creating riddles to solve but he never makes up the answers.
Here's another thing. The "debt."
It's never explicitally mentioned. What it is, who he owes it to.
The only actual verbal reference comes when Lutece says, "Your debt to Mr./Father Comstock is absolved."
He owed a debt to Comstock/himself?
I can only think of the "loop" theory.
He destroyed Columbia, that which he created, to save his own daughter. So he must "build" it again (Comstock's "arch-angel" story) only to save his daughter/"the girl" from himself/Comstock.
The whole thing fucking loops.
I'm telling you.
It's like chicken and egg.
I'm a little drunk.
I need to speak to Ken.
I just beat it and I'm super confused...
I don't really even know where to begin to be honest. Could someone give a rundown in real simple terms of the final 10 minutes or so?
Well they do state it's a gambling debt. Gambling could me he took a gamble to change things, who knows.