XiaNaphryz said:
XiaNaphryz said:
Kulock said:Oh god that was a glorious Quick Look. For those who haven't seen it:
http://www.giantbomb.com/quick-look-throwback-multimedia-celebrity-poker/17-3586/
mightynine said:I am probably asking the dumbest question: would this mean true 16:9 for TNG, or would the end result still be 4:3?
Darklord said:Here's the scene for those who don't want to watch the whole thing: http://youtu.be/rT0YznUsuDI
mightynine said:I am probably asking the dumbest question: would this mean true 16:9 for TNG, or would the end result still be 4:3?
By the way, we're told that the show's original 1.33:1 aspect ratio will be preserved (and that's what you'll get on Blu-ray), but 1.78:1 versions may be created for use in certain distribution venues. We'll post more as it's available.
Quick said:
This. 1000x this.djsandman said:This.....this is why I waited to buy.
BattleMonkey said:I assume thats just the opening for the Blurays. Would be amazing if they did improve the entire show like that.
teiresias said:The news is that every FX shot is being recomposited from the original film elements. There's no way they could charge by simply uprezzing the current SD special effect shots. It's just that the ILM shots in the pilot are more detailed than the shots in the rest of the series due to the higher grade film stock ILM used to do those shots (this is because the shots ILM did of the ship going to warp are pretty much reused throughout the entire series for generic "Enterprise going to warp" shots).
Hobbun said:I really hope the non-ILM film they recomposite from isn't drastically different in noticeable quality. I am already getting spoiled from that exterior shot going to warp. Would hate to watch other shots in space and think "Wow, that's nowhere near as good."
DarthWoo said:Whenever I was watching TNG during its original run, I could SWEAR that I could see people moving around in the windows of the observation lounge behind the bridge while it did its slow crawl forward during the intro credits. Of course I was still a little kid at the time...
C-Jo said:Sorry...
teiresias said:ILM used 8-perf 35mm film which is a film stock that runs through the camera horizontally (similar to how IMAX 15-perf 70mm film runs horizontally). Since it's horizontal that allows the captured frame to be physically larger on the film. All the other effect shots for the series were done using 4-per 35mm (vertical running), which is the same film stock used for regular actor photography and has roughly half the frame size as the film stock used by ILM.
teiresias said:Of course, ILM didn't do any of the effects shots beyond the pilot I believe, and I doubt many of the "ships of the week" were anywhere near as detailed as the Enterprise models, so there's bound to be some variation in quality (and whether the shots done by Image G were lit as carefully as the ILM shots will also affect it).
That's the MSRP. Most Blu-rays have an MSRP of anything from $30-50.Koomaster said:Wow, $22 for just 2 episodes and the pilot. These are going to be even more expensive than the DVD versions when they were first released.
zomgbbqftw said:Give me DS9 or give me death!
I bet CBS/Paramount will skip DS9 and go straight to VOY which is a bunch of bullshit. I love TNG, but I have never been bothered enough to get the DVDs and I'm not sure that would change for the Blu-ray editions. I would 100% double dip for DS9 though.
CiSTM said:Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.... I just bought that fancy new UK DVD set for 100Well there might still be chance that I could send it back and take the DS9 pack instead.
![]()
a176 said:who buys dvds in this day and age?
Stumpokapow said:People who want to watch TV shows that they believe will never come out on Blu![]()
The 4k resolution they talk about is not 4x the hd resolution we have now though. For some reason when they talk cinema resolution they talk horizontal resolution. IE, 4k is roughly 2x 1080p.B_Rik_Schitthaus said:From what I can remember.
They shot on normal film (that has a resolution of 4000) with the FX being done on tape, then the original film was transferred down to the resolution of the FX.
Huh?Yocke said:The 4k resolution they talk about is not 4x the hd resolution we have now though. For some reason when they talk cinema resolution they talk horizontal resolution. IE, 4k is roughly 2x 1080p.
I wouldn't take that as indication--a 4 episode sampler was never going to go for 1/6 the cost of a season (well, I HOPE not). Stargate Atlantis had a similarly priced disc with the two hour premiere and finale, but more recently the full five season set could be had for not much over $100.Koomaster said:Wow, $22 for just 2 episodes and the pilot. These are going to be even more expensive than the DVD versions when they were first released.
Stumpokapow said:People who want to watch TV shows that they believe will never come out on Blu![]()