Not really console advantages but Xbox One has some Star Wars controllers coming out in less than 4 weeks that aren't listed for PS4. lol
Those controllers are ugly as fuck lol. C3PO Gold 360 controller > All those Xbox One ones lol.
Not really console advantages but Xbox One has some Star Wars controllers coming out in less than 4 weeks that aren't listed for PS4. lol
I've been gaming for over 30 years so you can keep your "tip".
And how dare you blame consumers, when they were completely misled by not only EA, but every fucking journalist and even YouTube personalities like Jack Frags who was putting up multiplayer videos left and right leading up to launch!
I've been gaming for over 30 years so you can keep your "tip".
And how dare you blame consumers, when they were completely misled by not only EA, but every fucking journalist and even YouTube personalities like Jack Frags who was putting up multiplayer videos left and right leading up to launch!
Well, to be fair LevelCap and I believe JackFrags both mentioned (prior to launch at the Youtube Capture Event) that multiplayer matches were crashing but they weren't allowed to capture them. I believe they also mentioned that Dice told them that would be fixed by launch.
Don't know why this would matter. Titanfall came out almost 1.5 years ago, even if there are 5k people playing online right now. I can find matches within seconds.
now in this context, does it matter if there are 5million or 3million people are playing?
This game looks like an updated BF4 in Star Wars skin. Not trolling either because I liked BF4when it worked properly.
Framerate is my first concern for that kind of game, resolution comes after. I remembered that BF Hardline on xbox one had a better framerate overall. 720P though.
yeah, i did. i wasn't a fan.Have you ever played a Battlefront game? This game looks like it plays like those, with a more modern feel. The gameplay looks fine to me.
I thought EA Access users get to play the game 5 days earlier on XB1? Try before you buy.
Ignore if I'm wrong.
Ah ok.Because I was replying to his wording of "netbook CPU and mid-range GPU from 2012," not comparing Battlefront to other games.
I see it managing 40-50FPS on average.Assuming the game actually manages to run at 60 when it launches.
I dont remember this...
900p for X1 would be excellent.I expect both the PS4 & XB1 versions to be 900p. When BF4 was built the XB1 SDK was pretty awful according to a lot of developers, so I don't think you can use BF4 as an example. In Hardline's case, that game was a complete joke. Clearly there was no effort by the devs to do any real work and improve anything. As a matter of fact, it was graphically worse than BF4.
I expect both the PS4 & XB1 versions to be 900p. When BF4 was built the XB1 SDK was pretty awful according to a lot of developers, so I don't think you can use BF4 as an example. In Hardline's case, that game was a complete joke. Clearly there was no effort by the devs to do any real work and improve anything. As a matter of fact, it was graphically worse than BF4.
Don't worry lol, even my PC couldn't stabilize at 60 for extended periods on BF4. There will be dips.Ah ok.
I see it managing 40-50FPS on average.
This isn't BF4 though. Looks much nicer
Where did we get the 720p Battlefront info from anyways? Did they show a demo or somethingB
I don't think EA would be stupid enough to release this game in a broken state. It's their first major Star Wars game, screwing it up would ruin their relationship with Disney and kneecap a potentially major franchise for them.
It's assumed since PS4 at E3(And Gamescom?) was running at 900p, the same as BF4 on PS4.
Don't know why this would matter. Titanfall came out almost 1.5 years ago, even if there are 5k people playing online right now. I can find matches within seconds.
now in this context, does it matter if there are 5million or 3million people are playing?
Lol love this downplaying. Meanwhile we have incredible looking games on consoles like Batman Arkham Knight, The Order 1886, Driveclub, and Killzone that certainly don't look like anything I've ever seen on a netbook (are those even a thing anymore?) nor a mid-range GPU from 2012.
What a post. I said wow.
You and the majority of GAF.
I just don't see what's so hard about waiting a few days/weeks for a Digital Foundry verdict if technical issues bother you so much. EA wouldn't release a lot of their games in buggy states if it weren't for consumers being so willing to bend over for any old thing. Yes, it's dishonest on EA's part, but that's how advertising has worked for decades, and if people keep falling for it, then it's just as much their fault as it is EA's.
I assume it's going to be 900p on PS4 and 720 on Xbox One, just like both next-gen Battlefield games so far.
EDIT: PS4 version was 900p at E3.
What's the framerate for BF4 on consoles?
Yeah, but these games aren't truly next-gen games, and a lot has happened with Xbox One since then.
What's the framerate for BF4 on consoles?
https://youtu.be/M4gaVvHXNC8What's the framerate for BF4 on consoles?
PS4 will always have technical advantage over X1.
Framerate > resolution all damn day.
It looks completely different.
And that has been shown to not even be locked.
EA better not give us another launch BF4. They can't keep getting away with this.
They can and they will. Your average gamer is a gullible, easy to exploit target.
Gross what?Gross. EA is one of the only companies allowing sub 1080p PS4 games. It needs to stop.
Gross what?
Maybe is not possible to do such thing on a PS4?
If you feel so strongly about it, maybe you should build a PC.
On PS4 it's much smoother now than it was at launch. Modes with less than 64 players are a very solid 60 and the campaign is pretty much locked. It can get sketchy with 64 players though but I expect Battlefront will hold up pretty well with 40 players max and less environmental destruction.What's the framerate for BF4 on consoles?
This is unacceptable.
Yeah. Some people think the ps4 and Xone are superpowerful machines able to run anything at 1080 p 60fps... DelusionalIts unfortunate. But if you're truly worried about resolution and frames per second maybe you should be investing in a PC.
My ex missus maybe she couldn't tell the difference between a 68cm 4:3 TV & a 42" 16:9 plasma until it was pointed out lol but to say most people is a bit of a broad brush to paint...Most people using 1080p TVs at the distance they currently sit at can't even see a difference between 720p and 1080p.