B_Rik_Schitthaus
Banned
Good day to be me.Acosta said:Yes, I guess you like being directed to advance to X position and just worry about shooting when you are told to shoot, mmm? I'm sure this trash is well catered to you.
Good day to be me.Acosta said:Yes, I guess you like being directed to advance to X position and just worry about shooting when you are told to shoot, mmm? I'm sure this trash is well catered to you.
As in most of the team aren't there any more.Fallout-NL said:How's that?
Apart from the Darkness being not nearly as good as Riddick.
Acosta said:God, precisely this year, when we have seen how awesome can be when a modern developer respect an old game for what its is and build it from there... We have these FUCKING CLUELESS suits and their big companies trying to "defend" their fucking IPs without giving a shit about the games that made them valuable and memorable.
Fuck them!
RedSwirl said:Okay so a quick Wiki revealed to me that the original Syndicate was a tactical shooter and this is definitely not, since tactical shooters don't exist anymore. So, like XCOM, there's really no reason why they should be calling this Syndicate because it won't attract any fans of that old game. On the other hand, it's Starbreeze, so there's a great chance that the game on its own merits will be really good.
More hope than XCOM at least.RedSwirl said:Okay so a quick Wiki revealed to me that the original Syndicate was a tactical shooter and this is definitely not, since tactical shooters don't exist anymore. So, like XCOM, there's really no reason why they should be calling this Syndicate because it won't attract any fans of that old game. On the other hand, it's Starbreeze, so there's a great chance that the game on its own merits will be really good.
reptilescorpio said:As in most of the team aren't there any more.
snoopeasystreet said:I love things that are visceral and immersive. I also like games with good gameplay. Will this have good gameplay? If so, I'm stoked.
Pupi18 said:Change the game to 3rd person and problem solved.
Shadowrun?op_ivy said:looks like deus ex + perfect dark. sign me the fuck up
Pupi18 said:Change the game to 3rd person and problem solved.
Smision said:not on the bulletpoint list...it's anybody's call!
Air Zombie Meat said:Did someone just say "visceral"? 'cause I think I just heard someone say "visceral".
CecilRousso said:The main problem with this game is that publishers, developers and some people on forums should realize that not everyone likes to play every game as an FPS. The idea that FPS games is some sort of standard of action oriented games is one the reasons that I buy so few AAA titles.
Paradox said they would like to make a Starbreeze strategy game because they felt Syndicate was more of a cyberpunk GTA game.Zeliard said:Didn't another developer come out and say a while back that they'd be making a true Syndicate game since Starbreeze is going the FPS direction?
BiggNife said:I'm honestly surprised people thought the reboot wasn't going to be an fps
I'm more worried about the fact that Starbreeze isn't Starbreeze anymore. I didn't know about that until reading this thread so it's kinda disheartening.
Also Richard K Morgan writing the plot isn't necessarily a good thing. He wrote the plot to Crysis 2 and it was borderline incoherent. Being a good novel writer does not necessarily translate to a good game writer.
snoopeasystreet said:Oh well. As long as it ends up with a replay value of 8.4 or above, I'll still play it.
Y2Kev said:Shawn Elliott I think.
BiggNife said:Being a good novel writer does not necessarily translate to a good game writer.
Anyone else see this as their vision of the Atlantic Accelerator?faulty_fork said:Some more small screens:
Nirolak said:Paradox said they would like to make a Starbreeze strategy game because they felt Syndicate was more of a cyberpunk GTA game.
However, if someone actually makes a Syndicate strategy game, it would almost assuredly be Victory Games, since I don't think EA actually intends to work with Paradox.
Ninja Scooter said:People would then just bitch that it's a shitty Gears clone aiming to attract the dude bros. People set out to hate games like this from the beginning.
Nirolak said:Paradox said they would like to make a Starbreeze strategy game because they felt Syndicate was more of a cyberpunk GTA game.
However, if someone actually makes a Syndicate strategy game, it would almost assuredly be Victory Games, since I don't think EA actually intends to work with Paradox.
Crysis 2 had a cool idea for a story but I think he clashed with the way Crytek wanted to put that story into motion and it was just a mess in the end. It was if he wrote the story completely separate from the development team and had no idea that playing as a silent protagonist in that situation would be so jarring and... horrible I suppose is the word for the narrative. The jumping around in time at the end of levels certainly did no favours.bhlaab said:So that means that being a bad novel writer might translate to an amazing game writer! This game is going to be amazing!
edit sorry for double posting accident
Ninja Scooter said:People would then just bitch that it's a shitty Gears clone aiming to attract the dude bros. People set out to hate games like this from the beginning.
runnin_blue said:Not sure it's been said already but a lot of people complained when it was announced that Fallout 3 would be a FPS and look how that turned out.
outunderthestars said:THIS. The GAF game snob crew is out in full effect on this already.
Leckan said:Definition of VISCERAL
1
: felt in or as if in the internal organs of the body : deep <a visceral conviction>
2
: not intellectual : instinctive, unreasoning <visceral drives>
3
: dealing with crude or elemental emotions : earthy <a visceral novel>
4
: of, relating to, or located on or among the viscera : splanchnic <visceral organs>
hmmm