God Dayumm
Banned
If I'm eating that delicious sugary shit I do it with the understanding that I am damaging my body and I make peace with that. This changes nothing, the sugar alone causes both cancer, bone decay and dementia
It isn't unlike how sugar-laden "breakfast" cereals marketed to the population. The masses are ignorant of proper nutrition. The amount of sugar in everyday cereals is preposterous.I love how Nutella is "a breakfast treat for children".
No Italian worth his or her salt would have that for breakfast. It's CLEARLY not a breakfast thing - it's just how it's marketed here.
It's a god damn sugar spread with a tiny bit of cocoa and hazelnuts. It's use for DESSERTS, not breakfast. It's so absurd. It's okay in moderation once in a while (aka in a special dessert) but for the love of god it shouldn't be had every single day. I mean have actual chocolate (especially dark chocolate) if you're craving that in the morning, at least you'll have some semblance of better nutrients.
Have Nutella on a delicious Nutella pizza, for example, or Nutella cookies, or whatever. Just not as a breakfast item that you would have every day....
If it wasn't this it was the sugar.I knew that stuff tasted too good to not be evil.
First problem is that Cancer is a catchall term for a family of illness's that have many causes.
So yeah what causes Cancer is broad as fuck.
What is it with this forum and the inability of people on it to eat something without it harming them in some way?Nufaila is overrated gives me a headache in thee morning because of sugar dehydrToon
So isn't saying "nutella can cause you cancer" a bit of a stretch?The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) said in May that palm oil generated more of a potentially carcinogenic contaminant than other vegetable oils when refined at temperatures above 200 degrees Celsius. It did not, however, recommend consumers stop eating it and said further study was needed to assess the level of risk.
That's the crux of the issue with news reports on these types of studies, trying to make a headline out of very little compelling evidenceSo isn't saying "nutella can cause you cancer" a bit of a stretch?
I'm not arguing against that. Thinking that any individual study is the be-all end-all is part of the ignorance in the posts I quoted.There's nothing wrong with rigorous research,but what is often not brought up in the "study says x causes cancer" are the levels required to do so or at least those levels are downplayed the reporting in order to generate attention.
Aspartame for example requires in inordinate amount to have provable negative effects, by comparison the same amount of sugar consumed would certainly kill you.
In this example, how much Nutella must he consumed regularly to result in an observable cause and effect? (if this is stated clearly in the study my apologies - I'm at work and on mobile data so I can't really dive deep into any figures)
The sentiment your frustrated at exists because of the amount of wholesale shit we have to swallow based on experts advice regarding food and it's positive or negative effects when the emphasis should be on focusing on a healthy balanced diet where you do not overindulge in any particular food as too much of a good thing can kill you
Also destroying tons of rain forests. So that makes two very good reasons to avoid the stuff.
Downplaying the importance of rigorous research -- "everything causes cancer" is a fallacy that causes people to disregard advice and progress in cancer research. It calls for methods and solutions that are unscientific and in the end harmfull for the progress being made, i.e. "I don't care because everything will give me cancer!" or "why don't they cure cancer instead?". It it also quite tiresome.
I'm not arguing against that. Thinking that any individual study is the be-all end-all is part of the ignorance in the posts I quoted.
It's why a lot of "normal" folk don't feel like they can trust experts when in reality it's the media that is untrustworthy. As you say, the science is generally sound, just not hyperbolic enough for an attention grabbing narrative for newsthe problem isn't with the studies or research but news that yank things out of context and extrapolate to sensational conclusions. the problem with science is never science, it's people like you and me and journalists who are unwilling to do the work to get at least a minimal understanding of things.
I've made a habit of always reading the abstract of any referenced study, it's a good way to judge what news sources are worth paying attention to. In my experience 95% of science related articles in mainstream media misrepresent the source material. I shouldn't have to say how damaging this is to the credibility of science overall in the eyes of the ignorant self absorbed public.
kinda sad i didnt see this post yet
![]()
I knew it. Peanut butter wins.
From eating nutella everyday I cut it down to once a week (or 2 weeks)
I knew it. Peanut butter wins.
It's (Nut)ella because it's signature ingredient happens to be a nut.
Memes have a shelf-life, and this one is well past its 'best before' date.
What the fuck is a rapeseed?
They should just make a list of things that do not cause cancer. To save us time.
What the fuck is a rapeseed?
Not Nutella tho, handmade hazelnut spreads are the shit.
People are surprised a choclate-y spread filled with sugar and processed chemicals is bad for you? If you really don't want to get cancer you should eat plenty of healthy organic food and get plenty of excercise outside underneath our happy benevolent sun.
Sound like a Japanese game developer, or a VN made by a japanese developer.What the fuck is a rapeseed?
"Making Nutella without palm oil would produce an inferior substitute for the real product, it would be a step backward," Ferrero's purchasing manager Vincenzo Tapella told Reuters. He features in a TV commercial aired in Italy over the past three months that has drawn criticism from some politicians.
Any move away from palm oil would also have economic implications as it is the cheapest vegetable oil, costing around $800 a ton, compared with $845 for sunflower oil and $920 for rapeseed oil, another possible substitute.
So at this point, is there officially nothing on this planet that doesn't cause cancer?
The more you stay from processed foods the better.
![]()
Boom, this fancy chocolate hazelnut spread doesn't have any palm oil and is absolutely delicious!