MemoryHumanity
Member
Nintendo Life review - score pending until the online becomes available
http://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/wiiu/super_smash_bros_for_wii_u
http://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/wiiu/super_smash_bros_for_wii_u
why are ign reviews late so called review in progress
Well to be fair they didn't hold off on the reviews, but rather the review score (and whatever they will have to say about online). But it's better then posting a 'finalized' review while not having played the full game.It's not normal. Good to see a lot of sites holding off on their reviews.
I'm really feeling this thread.Complaining over a 9 already?
This thread is going places, I can feel it.
Complaining over a 9 already?
This thread is going places, I can feel it.
Knock it out, brother. I don't give a damn about scores. What I'm highlighting is ridiculously nitpicky reviewers with criticisms that either don't even make sense or are not even an issue for a majority of the players.
If online opens up on the 20th, then it's still before launch. Lowering scores solely because of that would be premature.Ugh look at all these review in progress reviews.. :|
Just lower the score if there are issues at launch.
But there was actually a ton of complaining when the final stage list was revealed. How isn't that a valid complaint?Knock it out, brother. I don't give a damn about scores. What I'm highlighting is ridiculously nitpicky reviewers with criticisms that either don't even make sense or are not even an issue for a majority of the players.
You keep using words like pointless and nitpicky which aren't appropriate in the context that you use them.Posting again for people jumping to pointless conclusions:
the game was already out in japan for weeks.
The netcode better be good.
Who are you to determine what is or is not an important issuePosting again for people jumping to pointless conclusions:
Apparently it is 9 PDT on the 20th, so 1 hour before it comes out on eShop.If online opens up on the 20th, then it's still before launch. Lowering scores solely because of that would be premature.
The netcode better be good.
When I’m playing Smash Bros. with my friends, nothing can be better. We scream, we argue, we laugh, and we never want to stop. The Wii U version is a fantastic addition to the series. The new modes are great, but the excellent mechanics and huge, varied roster make it potentially the best entry in the franchise yet.
Super Smash Bros. for Wii U is the system’s best game yet, one of the best multiplayer experiences available, and one of Nintendo’s finest achievements.
1v1 for glory is great on 3ds, i ain't worried.
Posting again for people jumping to pointless conclusions:
The netcode better be good.
The step back on the stage builder is a little baffling even if it wasn't the most fleshed out thing in Brawl to begin with, but everything else seems fine enough.
But there was actually a ton of complaining when the final stage list was revealed. How isn't that a valid complaint?
Can you make a list of objectively valid complaints for us? Someone should have given that to the reviews before they played the game so they knew what to be bothered by.
You keep using words like pointless and nitpicky which aren't appropriate in the context that you use them.
Who are you to determine what is or is not an important issue
This thread is going places, I can feel it.
Posting again for people jumping to pointless conclusions:
why are ign reviews late so called review in progress
I agree. Rate the game on a SP scale and then on a MP scale.Id be cool with websites having separate reviews for SP and MP.
I think he's saying that if the person reading the review doesn't care about something being lackluster in the game (even if it's a major component of the game like stage variety), the reviewer has no right to say the game is simply not quite perfect, rather than perfect.Wait, so you're saying that the those nitpicks shouldn't have affected the 1 point off a perfect score?
Hey, don't ask me. Only GreyFox seems to know. Maybe there are none when it comes to Smash Bros?What is an objectively valid complaint?
Knock it out, brother. I don't give a damn about scores. What I'm highlighting is ridiculously nitpicky reviewers with criticisms that either don't even make sense or are not even an issue for a majority of the players.
Id be cool with websites having separate reviews for SP and MP.
Fuck, I can't wait for this Friday. It's going DOWN! Didn't play the 3DS version because I wanted the full experience. I can't believe the reason I bought a Wii U is finally here.
fuck online. local is where it's at
What is an objectively valid complaint?
I left the game because I couldn't find a single match without lag or problems, and it only happened on this game, not on the dozens of others that I have on the PS3/Wii U/PC/PS Vita.
I think he's saying that if the person reading the review doesn't care about something being lackluster in the game (even if it's a major component of the game like stage variety), the reviewer has no right to say the game is simply not quite perfect, rather than perfect.
Hey, don't ask me. Only GreyFox seems to know. Maybe there are none when it comes to Smash Bros?
It's not normal. Good to see a lot of sites holding off on their reviews.
I think they're necessary because they're embarassing. It's good to have some humbling experiences.I feel like they're embarrassing and would support their abolishment.
The 3DSs dated hardware is susceptible to signal pollution, exceptionally so. It doesn't have good hardware on that front to begin with but it also doesn't have any real resources available to clean up the signal. You can see this with how blazingly slow the eShop is for doing anything that only requires the WiFi to send/receive data.
The fact that you lag so much, however, has to do with your connection. Either you have a lot of WiFi noise, or your signals not the best in the world from your router.
An enormous fighting game and a celebration of the Nintendo universe. Technically amazing, extremely imaginative and a step or two over the limit: again, a Nintendo game deserving a standing ovation.
humanity
Nintendo should have let reviewers try online sooner (idealy). Also, idealy, the embargo should have been some days ago.
My guess is that the servers do not exist right now so that is why they cannot connect. The servers go up on 9 PDT according to Nate.So are we all gonna have to download a day 1 patch then or just review copies???