alexthekid
Member
In two days i probably wont be proud of being Swedish anymore.
Det blåser hårt
Det blåser kallt
Det blåser högervindar överallt
Det blåser hårt
Det blåser kallt
Det blåser högervindar överallt
I don't follow, you are not proud that we are finally getting Sweden on track to become what it should have been?alexthekid said:In two days i probably wont be proud of being Swedish anymore.
Det blåser hårt
Det blåser kallt
Det blåser högervindar överallt
alexthekid said:In two days i probably wont be proud of being Swedish anymore.
Det blåser hårt
Det blåser kallt
Det blåser högervindar överallt
I'd make a quick remark here and say that there are some differences for sure regarding health insurance as they do wish to retract some of the changes the Alliance have done but otherwise I agree that they do share a lot ideas and I think people are exaggerating the differences between these two Coalitions (I mean both of them are pandering to the middle class after all). I mean just look how heated the debate got over the spending of those extra 10 billion kronors that were made available due to increased revenue. People were acting like those were the difference between life and death.jakershaker said:Well considering that Moderaterna and Socialdemokraterna pretty much have the same ideas on the important big things(healthcare, taxes,jobs and schools) I'm not seing how Sweden will change regardless of who wins.
I'm sure he wanted to propose but I just view it as him doing a media stunt. He knows that people are talking about how he hostile he is. Giving the bird to people, shouting like a maniac that they are liars, shunning journalists etc. This was just a stunt he did to make himself seem more warm and loving.Bento said:I'd make a quick remark here and say that there are some differences for sure regarding health insurance as they do wish to retract some of the changes the Alliance have done but otherwise I agree that they do share a lot ideas and I think people are exaggerating the differences between these two Coalitions (I mean both of them are pandering to the middle class after all). I mean just look how heated the debate got over the spending of those extra 10 billion kronors that were made available due to increased revenue. People were acting like those were the difference between life and death.
Bunch of drama queens are what we are :lol
I'd like to know btw what you guys think about the Ohly proposal? I cannot remember anything like that has ever happened during an election campaign. It really didn't sit right with me since it comes of as him taking advantage of his girlfriend to get media exposure, really cheap and the fact that he didn't even manage to do it properly (cameras got cut off) just made it even more embarrassing.
They might seem really similar in their new propositions, i will admit that. But they still dont share the same big ideas about healthcare and taxes atleast, you cant argue that. I can see that people dont think that the next four years wont change SO much depending on who rules. But if the right wing win, the political climate will move further to the right then if the red win, although they arent either afraid of private schools and tax reductions anymore.jakershaker said:Well considering that Moderaterna and Socialdemokraterna pretty much have the same ideas on the important big things(healthcare, taxes,jobs and schools) I'm not seing how Sweden will change regardless of who wins.
rezuth said:I'm sure he wanted to propose but I just view it as him doing a media stunt. He knows that people are talking about how he hostile he is. Giving the bird to people, shouting like a maniac that they are liars, shunning journalists etc. This was just a stunt he did to make himself seem more warm and loving.
I can see what you are saying here but I cannot shake the feeling that by the time we've finally pulled out from this war nothing substantial will have been accomplished. Yes, I do acknowledge that progress has been made with education (Don't remember the figures but there has been a large increase in children attending school with something like 30% of those being female) and I'm sure some areas have been made more safe. But as I understand it, several areas have also been lost to the Taliban since the invasion began and I can't say the current government instills me with confidence that they'll actually be able to govern once we leave.Shanadeus said:I honestly don't think this is the time to withdraw from Afghanistan, we should just avoid any future wars instigated by the US while staying committed to improve the situation in Afghanistan where the damage has already been done.
If every other reason fails, you can always view the war as a training camp for our soldiers. To make them better prepared for peace-keeping operations that they will inevitably be sent to. Now that's not good enough of a reason on its own but it becomes an acceptable reason when combined with the positive, no matter how minor, the presence of Swedish troops have in Afghanistan.Bento said:I can see what you are saying here but I cannot shake the feeling that by the time we've finally pulled out from this war nothing substantial will have been accomplished. Yes, I do acknowledge that progress has been made with education (Don't remember the figures but there has been a large increase in children attending school with something like 30% of those being female) and I'm sure some areas have been made more safe. But as I understand it, several areas have also been lost to the Taliban since the invasion began and I can't say the current government instills me with confidence that they'll actually be able to govern once we leave.
As harsh as it may seem to say, the Afghanistan War doesn't strike me as anything but a time and money sink. I mean, do we even have a clear goal anymore? What are the victory conditions? Bildt sure hasn't been able to specify these and I haven't really been able to make sense of what the Americans have in mind. As long as there is no such thing I don't really see any reason why we should be there and therefore I'm an advocate of a withdrawal. There's simply more pressing things these resources could be spent on domestically and countries we could do more good by supporting.
Now with all that said, I disagree with the Red-Green coalition on their stance on what to do after a withdrawal. Their idea of us sending supply and other sorts of aid is commendable in theory but considering the problems SIDA has been having distributing aid in especially African countries I highly doubt they'd have a much easier time in a war torn country like Afghanistan. Besides, without a strong military presence to keep the Taliban in check I'd seriously doubt the usefulness of our support for the civilians and the high risk of the money simply being pocketed by the Taliban (which has been the case with many similar rebel factions in the past).
This is so wrong but I love that song :lolMajine said:
Oh I love nerds sometimesMajine said:cake.jpg
They've stated that they won't cooperate with the alliance.nubbe said:Ive decided to vote for the greens since they will be the ones the alliance will make deals with if SD get into the riksdag.
Oh come on you drama queen, this happens to every party from time to time and SD is no exception. Now the violent attacks that actually have taken place against SD members and the obstruction of their meetings are indeed very worrisome for Swedish democracy. But don't equate that with this prank : PForsete said:Anti-democratic attacks are still alive and well I see. Keep up the good work, Sweden. *thumbs up*
Of course they will, it's just election rhetorics. Maria even almost kinda said so in the SVT questioning.pmj said:They've stated that they won't cooperate with the alliance.
Bento said:Oh come on you drama queen, this happens to every party from time to time and SD is no exception. Now the violent attacks that actually have taken place against SD members and the obstruction of their meetings are indeed very worrisome for Swedish democracy. But don't equate that with this prank : P
Why "fuck" the North when we bring some goodies to the tables for the rest of the nation? There's surely a lot that could be done better around here but to dismiss our contributions outright is pretty silly.nubbe said:Of course they will, it's just election rhetorics. Maria even almost kinda said so in the SVT questioning.
Just as C and FP would cooperate with S if they were big enough to run a minority government.
And fuck the north, move to Stockholm or secede to Finland.
Why would the alliance need to make any deals with the greens if SD gets in?nubbe said:Ive decided to vote for the greens since they will be the ones the alliance will make deals with if SD get into the riksdag.
Because SD could vote with any black that oppose any given proposition and put the legislation process on a halt?Shanadeus said:Why would the alliance need to make any deals with the greens if SD gets in?
It's not like the SD will be big enough for either blocks to consider cooperation with them.
That's kinda what I'm expecting, I think there's a fairly big probability of them getting over 50% of the votes.nubbe said:Because SD could vote with any black that oppose any given proposition and put the legislation process on a halt?
Unless the alliance get over 50% of the votes they will need support from the green left.
Reinfeldt even said himself that they would seek cooperation with the greens first if SD enters the riskdag.
Sverigedemokraternas hemsida slogs ut av en hackerattack sent på fredagen och ännu på lördagseftermiddagen gick det inte att nå den.
- Vi arbetar intensivt med att försöka lösa detta, säger Sverigedemokraternas presschef Mattias Karlsson.
Enligt honom har sajten utsatts för flera nätangrepp under en längre tid. Fredagens attack kom i samband med att partiet skulle lägga ut partiledaren Jimmie Åkessons kommentarer till SVT:s partiledardebatt.
Annons:
I ett försök att likna Martin Luthers attack mot kyrkan för snart 500 år sedan kördes SD-ledaren Jimmie Åkesson i svart bil fram till Riksdagshusets entré på lördagseftermiddagen. På dörren ville han fästa ett papper med de 99 punkter hans parti vill förändra om det tar plats i riksdagen.
Åkesson stoppades av väktare det är inte tillåtet att affischera på riksdagsdörren.
Flera fullsatta polispiketer bevakade utspelet, men det hela förflöt lugnt inför spridda förbipasserande turister och några journalister, främst från italienska och danska medier.
I can see that as a possibility due to the fact that SD seems to be taking votes primarily from the KD, but I think that the actual numbers for the SD will be lower than what polls have shown. Basing it all on my intuition so I might turn our completely off course but I think we'll be seeing the alliance in majority.nubbe said:I don't think the alliance will get a majority if SD enters.
Erasus said:So a day before the elction and I have no idea who to vote for. :lol
Did a test and FP was first, then Moderaterna, Vänster, MP, Socialdemokraterna etc
I really want to keep the "Swedish model" of doing things, but I also think that the Alliance has done a great job these past 4 years. I do not want SD in, just look at their fucking commercial. :lol
Might vote for PP just to LOL
EDIT: Bah, I'll retract that statement until I can find the articles I read on the subject of Danish free speech : SShanadeus said:Flera fullsatta polispiketer bevakade utspelet, men det hela förflöt lugnt inför spridda förbipasserande turister och några journalister, främst från italienska och danska medier.
nubbe said:SD would be the best to vote for if you want 4 years of LOLs since they actually have a chance to get seats unlike PP
I got this for usa politicianBenThereGamer said:I googled "swedish politician" and this was the first image:
![]()
What? :lolBento said:EDIT: Bah, I'll retract that statement until I can find the articles I read on the subject of Danish free speech : S
EDIT2: Bah, only found one of them so far: Så försökte Pia Kjærsgaard stoppa andras yttrandefrihet. I found more articles touching on similar issues regarding Danish free speech that make their criticism of our debate seem hypocritical (even if it doesn't invalidate said criticism).
Yeah, the context disappeared when I deleted my first post : PShanadeus said:What? :lol
I have no idea what you're talking about now, what did you originally post?
Minamu said:I voted for the Pirate Party yesterday. I have zero knowledge about the separate parties so casting a vote on them wouldn't feel right imho. No more Mod party please![]()
Bento said:Yeah, the context disappeared when I deleted my first post : P
My point was that during this Election we've seen the Danish media and politicians being very concerned regarding the state of Swedish free speech using the treatment of the Swedish Democrats as an example of how poor it is in our country. There is nothing wrong about the Danish standing up for free speech in foreign countries but it sort of falls flat and becomes hilariously hypocritical when infringement of Free Speech is being carried out in Denmark and cheered on by the very people that accuse us of doing the same : P
So, to sum it up, this was not directed at you in any way I was simply not surprised, but slightly amused, at the presence of Danish reporters at a Swedish Democrat event.
It's a shame, nerds make the most coherent and best arguments - but they have a small chance of winning when it comes to popularity contests (which politics basically is).Forsete said:I saw Debatt (SVT) where Rick Falkvinge debated Johan Pehrson.. Total destruction, even more so if you watched the broadcast they did on SVT Play (Eftersnack). :lol
Too bad they wont get enough votes, they hover around 1-0.7% .
If you want to keep the Swedish model, you better not vote right. Because in 4 years it will be to late.Erasus said:So a day before the elction and I have no idea who to vote for. :lol
Did a test and FP was first, then Moderaterna, Vänster, MP, Socialdemokraterna etc
I really want to keep the "Swedish model" of doing things, but I also think that the Alliance has done a great job these past 4 years. I do not want SD in, just look at their fucking commercial. :lol
Might vote for PP just to LOL
Psh, it won't be too late in four years time. Rather go a little extra to the right and then just re-adjust if things get worse by voting in a leftist government than going left all the way.alexthekid said:If you want to keep the Swedish model, you better not vote right. Because in 4 years it will be to late.
Politics doesnt have a re-adjust button. As an example we can talk about the companies that our goverment sell out just because of the sake of doing it. Its not like "we can just re-adjust" and take them back in a couple of years. What will they sell next? Vattenfall? That would propably be the last nail in the coffin for our industry.Shanadeus said:Psh, it won't be too late in four years time. Rather go a little extra to the right and then just re-adjust if things get worse by voting in a leftist government than going left all the way.
rezuth said:I don't follow, you are not proud that we are finally getting Sweden on track to become what it should have been?
TexasArmada said:And what exactly is it that Sweden should have been?
I understand you, she was most likely a serious Christian and against abortions anyway. Would have caused you a lot of trouble if the two of you were to bonkabadonka it.Minamu said:I met a wonderful woman at a party not long ago. At first, she seemed to try to scare guys off by saying she was voting for SD so they'd leave her alone. But she was apparently being serious :lol Not so wonderful anymore :S There are limits to my open mindfulness :S
:lol Great word. She didn't seem very Christian though (piercings, red hair, badass attitude xD).Shanadeus said:I understand you, she was most likely a serious Christian and against abortions anyway. Would have caused you a lot of trouble if the two of you were to bonkabadonka it.