Unhandled Exception
Member
Oh ok. Well if Mythbusters said so.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10...onic-interference-may-affect-airplane-safety/
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10...onic-interference-may-affect-airplane-safety/
Oh ok. Well if Mythbusters said so.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10...onic-interference-may-affect-airplane-safety/
75 cases where pilots BELIEVED that there may have been interference. Yeah, that's an airtight study.Oh ok. Well if Mythbusters said so.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10...onic-interference-may-affect-airplane-safety/
The report, according to ABC News, stresses that no direct correlation is being made between electronic interference from personal electronic devices and plane malfunctions. Instead it provides examples of narratives provided by airplane crew such as this:
75 incidents over 50 million flights. Shit happens.
Edit-Actually way more than 50 million flights. I thought it was US airlines but it looks to be worldwide.
Yeah we had this thread before. I was a little shocked at how many grown people couldn't handle just turning their phones off for a few minutes and justified it with 'yeah but they are wrong and don't know what they are talking about'.
I mean, really? You cant just... turn it off for a few minutes? I understand the likelihood of a problem is miniscule, but Jesus, humor us for a moment.... A freaking moment.
Shit happens on older planes that are not properly shielded. They still get used every day.
Oh ok. Well if Mythbusters said so.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/06/10...onic-interference-may-affect-airplane-safety/
I'm trying to imagine how this is somehow evidence of anything.“Auto pilot was engaged.”
At about 4500 ft, the autopilot disengaged by itself and the associated warnings/indications came on.
[Flight attendants] were immediately advised to look out for PAX [passengers] operating electronic devices.
… [Attendants] reported that there were 4 PAX operated electronic devices (1 handphone and 3 iPods).”
75 cases where pilots BELIEVED that there may have been interference. Yeah, that's an airtight study.
Please.
Who the fuck claimed it was an airtight study? I've yet to see any 'airtight studies' on the contrary, but I don't need to. People are not going to fucking die from not having their cell phones fully functional during the duration of a flight.
People aren't going to die from having them working, either. If you can find a single case in the history of fucking mankind where this has been shown to be the case, I'll be on your side.Who the fuck claimed it was an airtight study? I've yet to see any 'airtight studies' on the contrary, but I don't need to. People are not going to fucking die from not having their cell phones fully functional during the duration of a flight.
Also, burn.Given the total lack of evidence, I don't see how someone occupying themselves with their phone is any less "selfish cunt behaviour" than you demanding the world go into lockdown so you can feel safer while in the air.
Given the total lack of evidence, I don't see how someone occupying themselves with their phone is any less "selfish cunt behaviour" than you demanding the world go into lockdown so you can feel safer while in the air.
Saying that using a phone on the plane is dangerous is like a Christian telling you that if you commit sin your going to burn in hell
You're reaching pretty far into stupid ville. Again. If it was so dangerous then electronics wouldn't be allowed even in people's pockets cause shit could be left on and flight attendants would be trained to know every devices flight mode.Goddamn GAF has their fair share of conspiracy nuts. You're right, they just don't like you enjoying your musics and videos. The very thought of you not being bored to tears on a flight is nightmare fuel for pilots and attendants.
How is this a conspiracy? There are obvious reasons for it: the multiple tower-bounces, and the annoyance of having to hear some jerk-off talk loudly in the seat next to you. But there isn't a shred of evidence that shows cellular phone usage actually interferences with the communications, navigation, or guidance systems of any modern aircraft in the world.Goddamn GAF has their fair share of conspiracy nuts. You're right, they just don't like you enjoying your musics and videos. The very thought of you not being bored to tears on a flight is nightmare fuel for pilots and attendants.
You're reaching pretty far into stupid ville. Again. If it was so dangerous then electronics wouldn't be allowed even in people's pockets cause shit could be left on and flight attendants would be trained to know every devices flight mode.
Because that's exactly what this is. Not allowing your cell to send a signal = world going into lockdown.
Don't most U.S. aircraft ask that all passengers turn off all portable electronic devices, not just cell phones?And GameSpot thinks the Vita not being a smartphone is a bad thing. I'll be on my flight playing games while they can stare at a turned off phone wishing they can play Angry Birds.
Uhh except I never claimed it was 'so dangerous' that personal electronics should be banned from flights. I'm quite content with how things are enforced now. It's a cautionary policy, like I said. Its not there for anything other than caution.
You're reaching pretty far into stupid ville. Again. If it was so dangerous then electronics wouldn't be allowed even in people's pockets cause shit could be left on and flight attendants would be trained to know every devices flight mode.
Goddamn GAF has their fair share of conspiracy nuts. You're right, they just don't like you enjoying your musics and videos. The very thought of you not being bored to tears on a flight is nightmare fuel for pilots and attendants.
If she's selfish for wanting to keep her devices on, then you're doubly selfish for wanting everyone else to turn their shit off so you can feel better on the basis of your ignorance.
Is what the other dude was insinuating. And what I'm saying explicitly.
Don't most U.S. aircraft ask that all passengers turn off all portable electronic devices, not just cell phones?
So you don't care if people have stuff on as long as it's in their pockets where the flight attendant can't see it?
Cause that's how shit is enforced now, they enforce what they can see and don't worry about what they can't see.
Which is fine with me. If its not out in the open its not being used and is way less apt to cause any issues. I don't care if people are USING their shit when they're allowed to do so, and I don't care if it's tucked away in their pockets either. Being on the phone when its explicitly not permitted is bullshit, that's my complaint.
My ignorance of what exactly? There are plenty of planes still in use that do not have the proper EMI shielding, which is what this is all about. I'd rather not chance it, and airlines seem to agree with me.
Which is fine with me. If its not out in the open its not being used and is way less apt to cause any issues. I don't care if people are USING their shit when they're allowed to do so, and I don't care if it's tucked away in their pockets either. Being on the phone when its explicitly not permitted is bullshit, that's my complaint.
Which is fine with me. If its not out in the open its not being used and is way less apt to cause any issues. I don't care if people are USING their shit when they're allowed to do so, and I don't care if it's tucked away in their pockets either. Being on the phone when its explicitly not permitted is bullshit, that's my complaint.
I'm not arguing against following the rules or courtesy. I'm not going to cause a scene or stealth turn it back on. I like looking out the window the whole time actually.I think a better idea is this:
Even if I knew 100% that there was no risk with signals, if the flight crew asked me to turn off my phones for a couple of minutes at the start and end of the flight, I would still be ok with it, as a mere courtesy.
It doesn't have to be life or death for me to consider being mildly accommodating/polite. Me turning off my phone when the crew asks is not even really about the safety... I do it for the same reasons I don't pull out my phone in the middle of a movie. I just consider it a courtesy.
And modern phones don't put out enough EMI to do shit to unshielded instrumentation.
Basically, the dynamic tension that exists now between casual enforcement and casual callousness works.
Maybe it would be an issue between a shitty old plane, shitty old phones and everyone using it at once, but for the most part, it's a complete non-factor, and a meme propogated by those that are generally ignorant and fearful.
lol, I thought this was about interference and your safety. How does that change if a phone is on and sending/receiving a signal in your pocket?
I'm not arguing against following the rules or courtesy. I'm not going to cause a scene or stealth turn it back on. I like looking out the window the whole time actually.
I'm just laughing at this guy acting like it's so dangerous when it's regulated by movie theater type courtesy.
You assume I'm ignorant and fearful because I'd rather not have any issues with the safety of a flight, even if that means not having a cell signal. Gotcha.
Phones don't actually do shit to the plane. They tell you to turn it off because if you used it they'd lose signal all the time and people would get pissed. Oh and they want you to use their expensive phones. That's what a drunk pilot told me in a bar once.
Asking people to turn off their mobile phones, ipods etc has nothing to do with interfering signals and has all to do with evacuation safety.
During take off and landing are the two most likeliest times when an accident will happen, now if everyone is listening to music, playing video games, on their ipads etc, its going to be a lot more difficult to get people to listen to you when you're giving instructions.
Because phones put out significantly less signal when they're not being used.
There's already no issue with safety. Is that really such a tough concept?