Colonoscopies Explain Why U.S. Leads the World in Health Expenditures
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/h...eads-the-world-in-health-expenditures.html?hp
I'm shocked, absolutely shocked that our health industry advocates the most expensive and lucrative colon cancer screening tests when there are much cheaper and less invasive measures that produce the same results. (sarcasm)
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/h...eads-the-world-in-health-expenditures.html?hp
MERRICK, N.Y. Deirdre Yapalaters recent colonoscopy at a surgical center near her home here on Long Island went smoothly: she was whisked from pre-op to an operating room where a gastroenterologist, assisted by an anesthesiologist and a nurse, performed the routine cancer screening procedure in less than an hour. The test, which found nothing worrisome, racked up what is likely her most expensive medical bill of the year: $6,385.
That is fairly typical: in Keene, N.H., Matt Meyers colonoscopy was billed at $7,563.56. Maggie Christ of Chappaqua, N.Y., received $9,142.84 in bills for the procedure. In Durham, N.C., the charges for Curtiss Devereux came to $19,438, which included a polyp removal. While their insurers
Americans pay, on average, about four times as much for a hip replacement as patients in Switzerland or France and more than three times as much for a Caesarean section as those in New Zealand or Britain. The average price for Nasonex, a common nasal spray for allergies, is $108 in the United States compared with $21 in Spain. The costs of hospital stays here are about triple those in other developed countries, even though they last no longer, according to a recent report by the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation that studies health policy.
Largely an office procedure when widespread screening was first recommended, colonoscopies have moved into surgery centers which were created as a step down from costly hospital care but are now often a lucrative step up from doctors examining rooms where they are billed like a quasi operation. They are often prescribed and performed more frequently than medical guidelines recommend.
The high price paid for colonoscopies mostly results not from top-notch patient care, according to interviews with health care experts and economists, but from business plans seeking to maximize revenue; haggling between hospitals and insurers that have no relation to the actual costs of performing the procedure; and lobbying, marketing and turf battles among specialists that increase patient fees.
While several cheaper and less invasive tests to screen for colon cancer are recommended as equally effective by the federal governments expert panel on preventive care and are commonly used in other countries colonoscopy has become the go-to procedure in the United States. Weve defaulted to by far the most expensive option, without much if any data to support it, said Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, a professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
Like the Yapalaters, many other Americans have habits or traits that arguably could put the nation at the low end of the medical cost spectrum. Patients in the United States make fewer doctors visits and have fewer hospital stays than citizens of many other developed countries, according to the Commonwealth Fund report. People in Japan get more CT scans. People in Germany, Switzerland and Britain have more frequent hip replacements. The American population is younger and has fewer smokers than those in most other developed countries. Pushing costs in the other direction, though, is that the United States has relatively high rates of obesity and limited access to routine care for the poor.
I'm shocked, absolutely shocked that our health industry advocates the most expensive and lucrative colon cancer screening tests when there are much cheaper and less invasive measures that produce the same results. (sarcasm)