• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The 84th Academy Awards |OT| The Return of Billy Crystal

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Artist legitimately felt like a film from another era, despite its self-referential nature. The fact that so many are calling it "boring" or "bloated" is a testament to the shortened attention span of the average movie-goer.
 
The song from the best picture segment -- isn't it an original piece by Mychael Danna?

51IZnA6swaL._SS500_.jpg
 
Just caught this gem...
The artist is a fantastic film.

tinker tailor soldier spy and the tree of life sucks. STFU nerds and go to gaming and stop ruining every fucking awards thread with bullshit.

for those saying "no one gonna remember this next year" who the fuck cares, its about last year anyway. Fuck off. Do you remember what film and director won 20 years ago without google or wikipedia help? Shut up and stop clogging the thread.
Actually, that's a pretty good sign that the academy have no foresight and a history of bad decisions, asshole.
worst oscar show i've seen. an utter disaster.
Yeah, very boring. Last year's was a disaster too, but it at least had the comic value of James Franco's failed 'performance art'.
If Avatar can get nominated, why not?
Avatar wasn't a nasty horror movie.
Don't worry dude, just be patient for Michael Bay's remake.
"hurr go watch Transformers" is the laziest comeback to someone who doesn't like an 'arty' film you like.
It's particularly stupid when its being used in response to a person saying they didn't find The Tree of Life boring.
 
The Artist legitimately felt like a film from another era, despite its self-referential nature. The fact that so many are calling it "boring" or "bloated" is a testament to the shortened attention span of the average movie-goer.

Some who called it "boring" probably haven't even seen it. The fact is, most of the people who watched it in the same cinema as me were pleasantly surprised by it (and so was I). Anecdotal I know but it was definitely one of those movies where I didn't expect to like it when I went to see it.

Besides, the same people who say AA is irrelevant will be the first people who tune in next year for the same thing.
 
"hurr go watch Transformers" is the laziest comeback to someone who doesn't like an 'arty' film you like.
It's particularly stupid when its being used in response to a person saying they didn't find The Tree of Life boring.

You're right, I should have said The Tree of Life is an attempt to make an arty film for people with a frontal lobotomy.
 
Didn't read the thread but this was a really odd show.

How does Hugo win for visual affects over HP, Transformers, or any other movie? I loved Hugo and thought it should win movie of the year but how does it win for effects?
 
The Artist legitimately felt like a film from another era, despite its self-referential nature. The fact that so many are calling it "boring" or "bloated" is a testament to the shortened attention span of the average movie-goer.

I'm not angry that The Artist won, as such a thing was ordained long before it started going wide; I'm just disappointed that it managed to squander its potential so early on in favor of something far less interesting.
 
The Artist legitimately felt like a film from another era, despite its self-referential nature. The fact that so many are calling it "boring" or "bloated" is a testament to the shortened attention span of the average movie-goer.
This is one of my favourite films. It also features almost no spoken dialogue, but it has no music either, nor any 'character arcs' or dance numbers or huge drama. It's also nearly three hours.

The Artist is boring as hell. It's about an hour too long.
 
Alfonso Cuaron?

I was just going with the 2007 repeaters (Gone Baby Gone, Assassination of Jesse James, American Gangster, There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, Atonement, and Michael Clayton). Can't wait for Gravity, though. Children of Men was excellent. :D
 
I'm not angry that The Artist won, as such a thing was ordained long before it started going wide; I'm just disappointed that it managed to squander its potential so early on in favor of something far less interesting.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the movie didn't have any problems. Without going into detail for the sake of spoilers, I wasn't a huge fan of the ending. That being said, it's still one of the most refreshingly -- and paradoxically -- original movies I've seen in a while. An excellent and largely authentic throwback to one of my favorite eras of film.
 
I was rooting for Oldman all the way. I can't believe this was his first nomination, even after he gave the people such great performances from Beethoven to Dracula to James Gordon.


Why do conservative blogs hate so much on Harvey Weinstein? Curious...

This is news to me.
 
Didn't read the thread but this was a really odd show.

How does Hugo win for visual affects over HP, Transformers, or any other movie? I loved Hugo and thought it should win movie of the year but how does it win for effects?

Never doubt the VFX Predictinator:

For the uninitiated, The VFX Predictinator is a formula my wife and I developed in 2010 that accurately predicted the winner of the visual effects Academy Award from 1989-2010 based on quantifiable data points. Last year, we expanded the formula to accommodate five nominees with success -- The Predictinator accurately predicted the winner ("Inception"), just as it did for the previous 21 years.

graphic2.jpg
 
However, seeing as Drive and Melancholia weren't nominated for anything. This years Oscars were invalid before it even began.

The Oscars never recognize movies like Drive and Melancholia. Films that pander to old white male win these awards. There is nothing new.

When was the last time the Best Picture was even critically a top 5 film of the year? You want to see those films recognized, you'll have to go somewhere else.
 
Didn't read the thread but this was a really odd show.

How does Hugo win for visual affects over HP, Transformers, or any other movie? I loved Hugo and thought it should win movie of the year but how does it win for effects?

That movie was mostly CGI. You not noticing is why it won, I guess?
 
The Oscars never recognize movies like Drive and Melancholia. Films that pander to old white male win these awards. There is nothing new.

When was the last time the Best Picture was even critically a top 5 film of the year? You want to see those films recognized, you'll have to go somewhere else.
I think the last time was about half an hour ago.
 
The Oscars never recognize movies like Drive and Melancholia. Films that pander to old white male win these awards. There is nothing new.

When was the last time the Best Picture was even critically a top 5 film of the year? You want to see those films recognized, you'll have to go somewhere else.

Critically? >_> Didn't The Artist have an 89 Metascore. The Hurt Locker had a 94, I think. Yeah... If anything, Oscars have been inline with critics since the Crash debacle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom