• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Crow is being remade: Brandon Lee officially rolls in grave

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think those of us who were in high school or middle school at the time and listened to the soundtrack and were having our formative years in the early 90's, generally speaking, probably aren't going to be able to convey what's so offensive about the idea of doing a shitty remake. Yes, by purely objective standards, it's no masterpiece, I don't know what to tell you. The original Crow is a tough movie to look at objectively.
 
ReconYoda said:
Its not like the first one was some classic to be revered.

Ya that's my point exactly. Why not remake this slightly better than average film? But have Gary Oldman be the Big Bad this time.

The only thing that's classic about that Movie is the Soundtrack.

Okay, the gang of Bad Guys is great too.
 
Count Dookkake said:
I am genuinely surprised that anyone regards this as anything close to a classic.

Out of curiosity, were you guys little kids when you saw The Crow for the first time? Was the film your first exposure to the character?
It was well received critically at the time by adults, too.


As for myself...
I watched it first when I was 10, as the final film of a Bruce Lee film and documentary marathon on Channel 4. A film like The Crow does incredible things to a ten year old, especially when you know the lead died. Makes them see things differently. Has a profound impact on how they develop in regards to artistic taste and imagination.

I mean, shit, the story of The Crow is an artist rising from the grave because of unfinished business. True enough, Brandon Lee rose from the grave because he had unfinished business - he wanted to be in one film that was for him, rather than being cast in an action role because of his father. Again, to a young mind, that idea is like being hit by a freight train.

I didn't watch it a second time until a month and a half ago.

It is still good. It isn't perfect, nor is it a Great, but it is good. Well shot, some good acting, competent script, incredible soundtrack. A real B/B+, pushed over subjectively into an A- due to the IRL history of the thing.

That said, there is nothing sinful about a remake, so long as that remake does both:
1 - Is as good as or (preferably) better than the original.
2 - The remake offers a different interpretation and take, so that the two can stand side-by-side as complementary pieces.

In the case of The Crow, I fear 2000's sensibilities makes #1 extremely difficult, but #2 is easier due to the original film not sticking amazingly close to the original comic.

I say there's room for a remake attempt here. Let them.


Duane Cunningham said:
The original Crow is a tough movie to look at objectively.
This is perhaps the most truthful statement ever made about a film on GAF. I wouldn't agree with your other statement about the remake being offensive, though.
 
Duane Cunningham said:
I think those of us who were in high school or middle school at the time and listened to the soundtrack and were having our formative years in the early 90's, generally speaking, probably aren't going to be able to convey what's so offensive about the idea of doing a shitty remake. Yes, by purely objective standards, it's no masterpiece, I don't know what to tell you. The original Crow is a tough movie to look at objectively.

I was in high school when this movie came out.

A remake is in no way offensive.
 
polyh3dron said:
STARRING MARK WAHLBERG

works

sXbRF.jpg
 
The problem with a remake like this is that for a lot of people, the movie has become idealized beyond (what I think is) the scope of the source material. I can say for me both the movie and the soundtrack represent a period in my early life, and as such I'd have a much harder time connecting to any sort of refresh. If the remake isn't directed at fans of the original, who's going to go see it then?
 
Count Dookkake said:
I was in high school when this movie came out.

A remake is in no way offensive.


Well... you were probably cooler than me. My dumb stoner friends and I were listening to Nirvana and Mudhoney, wearing purple plaid and thinking we were really edgy. We were just dumb teenagers spending our money on stuff that was being marketed toward us, but we didn't know it at the time. If you guys were smart enough not to fall for it, great.
 
Not interested because it's not a particularly interesting enough premise to warrant a remake and because I'm sick of sequels and remakes period. I don't really care whether an actor died during the making of the first one. Not sure why I should. Weird lines are drawn when talking about nostalgia I guess.
 
Simon Belmont said:
I feel like I'm missing something if I have to explain how posting a song that was on the original soundtrack is relevant to your post about the original soundtrack.
Sorry but are you implying the The Cure or that track are shit? Are you mad?
 
I was around 13 when this was out in theaters, saw it on VHS because I was too young for the theater. It was one of my favorite flicks back in the day too, didn't know shit about it being for fat goth girls or whatever.
 
polyh3dron said:
I was around 13 when this was out in theaters, saw it on VHS because I was too young for the theater. It was one of my favorite flicks back in the day too, didn't know shit about it being for fat goth girls or whatever.
Then you went to high school right?
 
So what happens when they remake all the main stuff that can be exploited? Are they going to then remake the remakes? I dread the day they remake Back to the future. I'm not against remakes all together but don't do it to films that don't need it.
 
CaptYamato said:
Then you went to high school right?
Pretty much everyone I knew in high school liked The Crow, and my high school didn't have a whole shitload of "goth" people. It pretty much cut across demographics.
 
CaptYamato said:
The amount of people in this thread that love The Crow is astonishing.
Why? The film was well received critically and commercially.

When did it become wider opinion that hardly anyone liked it?
 
Count Dookkake said:
Yeah, I am quite surprised.

Quite a cult favorite to this day. As for me I thought the original wasn't that great, and although it may upset others it seems to be a better candidate for a reboot than other recent films.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Yeah, I am quite surprised.

At first I thought it was just the knee-jerk reaction of how unoriginal Hollywood is. However, these guys are acting like hollywood just kicked their dogs.
 
Suairyu said:
Why? The film was well received critically and commercially.

When did it become wider opinion that hardly anyone liked it?

It wasn't that well received. It's like the Daredevil of its time. Acceptable, not terrible.
 
Count Dookkake said:
It wasn't that well received. It's like the Daredevil of its time. Acceptable, not terrible.
Not even close. It made good bank and critics praised it. "Style over substance" was a common criticism, but it was generally though that the style alone was worth it.
 
CaptYamato said:
The amount of people in this thread that love The Crow is astonishing.
The implication of The Crow changing or shaping anyone's formative years kind of tells me all I need to know about them.

Sulky motherfuckers.
 
The first movie was truly awful. Something akin to Spawn or any other forgotten 90s fantasy movie. There is no way the remake could be worse.
 
Suairyu said:
Why? The film was well received critically and commercially.

I can think of dozens of movies that were "well-received" that nobody would care if remake plans were announced. I think it's surprising to see this movie treated as if it's Citizen Kane rather than what it really is -- competent, entertaining fodder for the Hot Topic crowd.

Even the creator seems to have little respect for the franchise, given how massively whored out it was. I suspect that James O'Barr is out of money again, and that's why we're seeing the revival discussed once more.
 
Duane Cunningham said:
They should remake Rocky Horror Picture Show, too. It had a pretty shitty budget, and just think, it could have Megan Fox in it now.

This is happening.

No toe-thumbs, though.


Simon Belmont said:
Solid argument.

You should say the same to the post to which I was responding.
 
CaptYamato said:
The amount of people in this thread that love The Crow is astonishing.
Is it really? It seems that it was pretty well received by critics at the time, if not for acting, then definitely for the visual style.

I finally saw it in its entirety the other day on TV and loved it. A lot of people have told me they loved it. It's not really a rare thing.
 
Duane Cunningham said:
They should remake Rocky Horror Picture Show, too. It had a pretty shitty budget, and just think, it could have Megan Fox in it now.

Given its roots in the theatre, nobody would care that much about a Rocky Horror remake. Or at the very least there wouldn't be this stupid pretense that the original is a completely untouchable classic. Rocky Horror is essentially "remade" on a weekly basis by shadow casts, and less frequently by the stage productions that completely change up the set and costume design.
 
Count Dookkake said:
You should say the same to the post to which I was responding.

You made the claim that it was comparable to Daredevil at the time of it's release, since you made the claim you should provide some sort of evidence or argument to back that up. Shouldn't be too hard right? Just go to Rotten Tomatoes or metacritic to see what people were saying about each movie when they came out. Don't worry, we'll wait.
 
Count Dookkake said:
This is happening.

No toe-thumbs, though.

Oh my god, I just looked it up. No kidding, instead of the Megan Fox joke, I almost said "the people from Glee could make it"... and that's exactly what's happening.

I don't know what to say. Screw it, remake Romper Stomper and Sid and Nancy while we're at it, too.
 
Simon Belmont said:
You made the claim that it was comparable to Daredevil at the time of it's release, since you made the claim you should provide some sort of evidence or argument to back that up. Shouldn't be too hard right? Just go to Rotten Tomatoes or metacritic to see what people were saying about each movie when they came out. Don't worry, we'll wait.

Does RT have a way to filter out non-contemporary reviews?

It seems that every film gets better reviews as time goes on.



Anyway, The Crow is mediocre.

I am glad the remake is happening.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Does RT have a way to filter out non-contemporary reviews?

It seems that every film gets better reviews as time goes on.



Anyway, The Crow is mediocre.

I am glad the remake is happening.

Filter for 'Top Critics', they'd be unlikely to review a movie post release.
 
sk3 said:
The first movie was truly awful. Something akin to Spawn or any other forgotten 90s fantasy movie. There is no way the remake could be worse.
I wouldn't have agreed with this as an adolescent, but I figured it out once I watched the film again almost a decade ago. The Crow is a very corny action revenge flick with a series of progressively worse movie sequels and a horrid TV show. I'd imagine that a remake could be better than the original, but Hollywood loves to prove me wrong.
 
Capt, I actually saw a full-blown dressed-and-made-up-like-Death-of-the-Endless goth earlier in the week. In 2011.

How is that even remotely acceptable in 2011?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom