HamPster PamPster
Member
When I saw you all talking about giant picture filled |OT|'s in this thread I was hoping I missed a video
Quicklook: A Neogaf |OT| (Vinny/Patrick 34:25)
Quicklook: A Neogaf |OT| (Vinny/Patrick 34:25)
An Endurance Run would be more appropriate, I think.HamPster PamPster said:When I saw you all talking about giant picture filled |OT|'s in this thread I was hoping I missed a video
Quicklook: A Neogaf |OT| (Vinny/Patrick 34:25)
That wasn't him, that was... who was that?Freedom = $1.05 said:One of the best OT's was the one crushed made for Fallout 3. Thing was just beautiful, man.
EmCeeGramr said:That wasn't him, that was... who was that?
Oh man that's so good. BwahahahEmCeeGramr said:That wasn't him, that was... who was that?
edit: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=339523
oh right, tieno, i thought so
![]()
aahahahha
EmCeeGramr said:I swear someone else did the same thing a couple years later, but by that time GAF had become infested with even more humorless killjoys who spent the entire thread going, "wtf!!! this isn't the real op... lock this and ban this troll. can we get a mod mayhaps???"
Goldmund said:Does anyone know what happened? He had the restrained demeanor of a moderator hopeful.
EmCeeGramr said:I swear someone else did the same thing a couple years later, but by that time GAF had become infested with even more humorless killjoys who spent the entire thread going, "wtf!!! this isn't the real op... lock this and ban this troll. can we get a mod mayhaps???"
i love it when you read locked threads with banned people and future mods are in there talking about how awesome it is and how the dudes are rightGreen Scar said:Some dude made a fake MW2 OT but it got locked and he got banned for saying 'fag', ahahaha
Whoever recently did the X-Men: Destiny thread got a laugh from me. DS focus in the first post with "Oh yeah, it's coming out on PS3, 360, etc." in the second post.obonicus said:Evilore still made the DA and DA2 threads pretty jokey, too.
Dizzy-4U said:I haven't laughed this hard in a while. My stomach hurts!
Funniest quick look of 2011.Zero-Crescent said:Let me tell you something brother: Turns out that Jeff and Vinny did a Quick Look for Hulk Hogan's Main Event!
Quick Look: Hulk Hogan's Main Event (Jeff/Vinny 24:24)
Great timing. I'm going to watch this as I nod off to sleep.ChuckNoLuck said:
"Battlefield 2 was a crazy-shit simulator." -- Jeff Gerstmann (2011)ChuckNoLuck said:
So the bad guy's name is Solomon... That means that there's only one bad enough dude to stop Solomon fast, Ted Fast. And by that I mean Pierre Kirby.ChuckNoLuck said:
Everything looked so boring until they got into that match. From the beginning Battlefield has been about hey, dumb shit is gonna happen. Why do they seem so intent to make it look like every other game available?Ozone said:Get in the chopper. FUCK THIS CHOPPER!
I expected that ^^TheOddOne said:"So it's a Battlefield game!" - Jeff
How dare he wrote off MGO.StuBurns said:Jeff complaining about BF3 getting great scores despite reviewers shitting on the campaign is irritating given how he openly wrote off the multiplayer in GTA4/MGS4 and still spoke very highly of them.
The point isn't that he wrote it off, it's that he seems to take offense to his peers doing the same with the BF3 campaign.slaughterking said:How dare he wrote off MGO.
RomanticHeroX said:Everything looked so boring until they got into that match. From the beginning Battlefield has been about hey, dumb shit is gonna happen. Why do they seem so intent to make it look like every other game available?
StuBurns said:The point isn't that he wrote it off, it's that he seems to take offense to his peers doing the same with the BF3 campaign.
I disagree, not making the BF3 single player would have just meant less people care about it. It's not as if it'd help multiplayer, in fact that's another thing Jeff discussed with regards to Uncharted 3, again in reverse though. I think he'd have a point if reviews didn't mention not liking the single player, and just gave the game a great score, but if they seemingly didn't factor the single player into the multiplayer, in the same way Jeff doesn't factor in the multiplayer when discussing the quality of GTA4/MGS4, I don't see the problem. If it was the best multiplayer game ever, and worth $60 for that alone, and without the single player it'd still be a ten, I don't think marking it down because of a lackluster campaign you never have to touch is also on the disc. It's like giving MGS3 Subsistence a 6 because it includes MG1 which was crap.Sega1991 said:That's the reverse, though. That's Jeff writing off multiplayer modes in favor of singleplayer, which is understandable - you hear guys like Epic say that more than half the people who play Unreal Tournament 2004 played the game offline with bots, and for as big of a draw as multiplayer undoubtedly has, a game's singleplayer mode is what is "for everyone".
With Battlefield 3, Jeff's issue seems to be that everybody's ignoring that the singleplayer is lackluster and is scoring the game almost exclusively as a multiplayer game.
That's understandable to me. In a game with singleplayer, multiplayer is meant to be icing on the cake. Singleplayer should technically be the main draw in a game like that, the one thing everybody can play because it does not require friends present or an active internet connection. If the singleplayer is good, the quality of the multiplayer almost kind of doesn't matter. But that scenario does not exist in reverse - bad singleplayer and good multiplayer just means you shouldn't have even bothered with the singleplayer at all.
After all, it's not like Battlefield 2 had singleplayer, and Jeff professes his love for that right in the QL.
That's completely besides the point though.Brobzoid said:On consoles it's more expected to have a 'substantial' single player portion to a retail game. Additionally, all of the promotional material for BF3 seems to focus on the single player - obviously because that's where the flash is, but it makes it seem like there is a proper single player game there. So I think it's totally fair to slag it off in a review for having a lackluster single player.
StuBurns said:Jeff complaining about BF3 getting great scores despite reviewers shitting on the campaign is irritating given how he openly wrote off the multiplayer in GTA4/MGS4 and still spoke very highly of them.
ChuckNoLuck said:
Him holding a preference is fine, him beliving he can ignore aspects of a game in a review score but others can't is hypocritical.codhand said:This is consistent if he values Campaign over Multi, no?
Darklord said:Aww man, 360. Lame. Is any giantbomb staff read this, are you going to only review the 360 version?
They have a PC key, it just doesn't unlock until midnight (not sure when they recorded this, but they've probably installed the game already). It's one of the very first things they say. I would assume that they will review the PC version (as well).Darklord said:Aww man, 360. Lame. Is any giantbomb staff read this, are you going to only review the 360 version?
Where did they bill themselves as a CoD killer?codhand said:To me what's hypocritical is billing yourself as a CoD killer, but then having a shit campaign.