GuessWho said:how do you get to that link? I can't find it when i go to amazon.com
It was posted earlier in this thread.
GuessWho said:how do you get to that link? I can't find it when i go to amazon.com
OokieSpookie said:I am honestly so tired of people bitching about blu ray movie prices.
VanMardigan said:Why? Why do you get so worked up over this? It's a legitimate concern that is not dismissed just because people can go bargain hunting on Ebay, wait for Amazon sales, or print online coupons.
The prices need to come down. I don't see why anyone would be bothered by that notion.
I'm just tired of hearing it here on the same forum, over and over.VanMardigan said:Why? Why do you get so worked up over this? It's a legitimate concern that is not dismissed just because people can go bargain hunting on Ebay, wait for Amazon sales, or print online coupons.
The prices need to come down. I don't see why anyone would be bothered by that notion.
Over 120 movies, nice.Defcon said:http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&plgroup=1&docId=1000205241&plpage=1&tag=blurayforum-20
That other link someone posted had shit movies. That one actually has some good ones for cheap.
VanMardigan said:Why? Why do you get so worked up over this? It's a legitimate concern that is not dismissed just because people can go bargain hunting on Ebay, wait for Amazon sales, or print online coupons.
The prices need to come down. I don't see why anyone would be bothered by that notion.
dallow_bg said:I'm just tired of hearing it here on the same forum, over and over.
They obviously need to come down, and will come down eventually.
These.tha_con said:Maybe because it never stops, and complaining on NEOGAF, a VIDEOGAME FORUM, is not going to bring those prices down.
FFObsessed said:I Am Legend review posted?
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1336/iamlegend.html
PQ 5/5
AQ 5/5
Still don't know if I should blind buy it or not.
FFObsessed said:I Am Legend review posted?
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1336/iamlegend.html
PQ 5/5
AQ 5/5
Still don't know if I should blind buy it or not.
yeah, that movie will look awesomely tremendous in HD. Hopefully they splurge and put a lossless track on it as well. even with my 2001 receiver I can hear a difference in the tracks, a distinct "loudness" that makes the room shake that much more.dankir said:When is the Blu Ray version of Advent Children coming?
mrklaw said:my Enchanted bluray shipped from movietyme. First blind buy for ages. Hopefully it'll be a fun little movie with something in it for grown ups but good for the kids too.
FFObsessed said:I Am Legend review posted?
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1336/iamlegend.html
PQ 5/5
AQ 5/5
Still don't know if I should blind buy it or not.
how early? i can't find it.adas said:It was posted earlier in this thread.
MoxManiac said:How is the transfer for the Terminator(s) BR's?
Xater said:I would not recommend blind buying it. It's not really a great movie.
uh, OK then. good luck with that.*edited out crazy talk*OPINION: DVD revival
By Paul Sweeting
March 7, 2008
In the aftermath of Blu-rays victory over HD DVD in the high-def format war, many commentators predicted Blu-rays reign would be short lived, soon to be done in by digital downloads. But as Sony officials know, Blu-ray supporters biggest immediate challenge is to get consumers to make the leap from standard DVD to high-def.
The battle really begins now to move people away from DVD to Blu-ray, Sony Electronics president Stanley Glasgow told reporters at his semi-annual roundtable last week, according to VB sister publication TWICE. We have a lot of work to do now, so we are not gloating. Upscale DVD players have gotten better and better. We need to explain the additional feature sets, PIP, BD Live and other features.
It may not only be upscaling DVD players that Blu-ray finds itself up against, however. Barely missing a beat after abandoning HD DVD, Toshiba and Microsoft, two of that formats principal backers, have turned their attention to an attempt to overhaul the standard DVD format by adding a host of new features and functionalities.
At the most recent DVD Forum meeting last month, Toshiba got itself reelected as chair of the Steering Committee for another two years, leaving it well-positioned to guide future developments in the format.
At the same meeting, according to a summary posted on the Forum Web site, the committee approved the formation of a new working group (dubbed WG-12) to study and specify network applications and related network specification of DVD Forum formats, make recommendations for better interoperability and functionality of network-connected DVD Forum specified devices and content and communicate on relevant recommendations with other standard creation organizations.
What that means in non-Forum legalese, Im told by sources familiar with the plans, is that the new working group will look for ways to incorporate some of the same next-gen functionality developed for HD DVD into a DVD 2.0 format, including the HDi interactive layer and the advanced network connectivity.
One of the co-chairs of WG-12 is Microsoft, which played a major role in developing those capabilities for HD DVD (the other co-chair is Panasonic).
Toshiba and Microsoft are also working through the DVD Copy Control Assn., which oversees the CSS encryption format used on standard DVDs, to try to breathe new life into the old format.
Microsoft was behind a proposal to DVD-CCAoriginally floated two years ago but revived in modified form late last yearto introduce managed-copy to standard DVDs, under which consumers would be able to copy their DVDs to a hard drive under carefully DRMed conditions, for streaming over a home network.
Since then, Microsoft has largely abandoned the effort, after meeting multiple objections from the studios.
The studios have since introduced their own proposal for managed-copy, but it met a cool reception from other members of DVD-CCA, in particular the computer and software companies, who felt the studios more limited proposal would not attract enough consumer interest to make it worth implementing.
There the matter sat until last week, when Toshiba unexpectedly raised the issue on a conference call, according to several knowledgeable sources, signaling an apparent new interest on the part of the CE company in managed-copy.
Whether Toshiba will have any better luck getting the studios to go along with a more comprehensive managed-copy proposal than Microsoft had, my sources have their doubts.
But clearly, Toshiba is doing everything it can to try to keep the DVD format relevant, now that it no longer has a horse in the high-def sweepstakes.
Whether anyone would actually build a machine that includes all the new functionality under discussion, even Toshiba, depends entirely on whether enough studios signal a willingness to release DVDs that take advantage of the new capabilities.
And that will likely depend on how quickly Blu-ray takes off.
so maybe, maybe not. blogs are bad!Facts:
- The SC agreed upon creating WG-12 by 17-1-2 (only Pioneer voted no, and Philips and Sharp abstained; all others voted yes).
- The SC unanimously approved Microsoft and Panasonic
- The mandate of WG-12 is exclusively "To study and specify network applications and related network specification of DVD Forum formats, make recommendations for better interoperability and functionality of network connected DVD Forum specified devices and content, and communicate on relevant recommendations with other standard creation organizations"
Nah, I was going to say something about you quoting Deadmeat instead.bune duggy said:*insert witty flame here about profiles*
wait, what? oh, I see the topic title was changed. so the specs are bunk but what about the rest? is the linked article still true?Mmmkay said:Nah, I was going to say something about you quoting Deadmeat instead.
I guess you didn't see this article in the same thread I saw it, I forgive youbune duggy said:wait, what? oh, I see the topic title was changed. so the specs are bunk but what about the rest? is the linked article still true?
Deadmeat so needs his own Wiki page.
bune duggy said:wait, what? oh, I see the topic title was changed. so the specs are bunk but what about the rest? is the linked article still true?
Deadmeat so needs his own Wiki page.
did you see his original post or something?Mmmkay said:I guess you didn't see this article in the same thread I saw it, I forgive you![]()
Well, he kinda does.OokieSpookie said:Deadmeat needs to just live up to his handle...
1. Deadmeat 11 up, 2 down
A name for someone who posts rubbish comments on public chatrooms
ie Jesus who is that deadmeat who posted that?
:lolbune duggy said:did you see his original post or something?
Well, he kinda does.
Flo_Evans said:"Super Upscaling" (to 960p???) what the fuck TV accepts that resolution? Decent upscaling DVD players already go to 1080p.
Double-scaling is basically exactly as it sounds. It is literally doubling the native resolution of a DVD (480p to 960p), and then boxing it in black to get it to a native 1080p resolution for TV compatibility.
Why do this? This is how anal the engineers working on PS3's media functionality are. When doing standard upscaling (regardless of the algorithms/filters employed), you are going from 480p (once deinterlaced) to either 720p or 1080i/p. That is not an evenly divisible conversion, so NONE of the original pixels remain in the upscaled image. All pixels are interpolated. When doing double-scaling, all the original pixels still remain with the newly interpolated pixels filling out the rest of the resolution.
Basically, its for people looking for the most accurate image as compared to the original source material. On most material, I do find it subtly crisper but that is a bit hard to verify since the image size is smaller. Once I get a front-projector, I think this will be especially interesting to mess around with.
Onix said:Oh god ... fuck you Toshiba and MS :lol
Is there an unrated version or director's cut? A PG-13 vampire flick doesn't sound very appealing.FFObsessed said:I Am Legend review posted?
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1336/iamlegend.html
PQ 5/5
AQ 5/5
Still don't know if I should blind buy it or not.
traveler said:Got a few questions:
1) How is The Assassination of Jesse James both in terms of movie quality and in terms of picture quality? I've heard good things about its cinematography so I figured it'd make a good first Blu Ray to watch.
I thought the movie was excellent. Some people have criticized it for being "too slow" but I thought it was perfectly paced, it was one big drawn out suspense towards the assassination, and the movie was just beautiful I thought, very moving and thought provoking in a way. Quite tragic. The PQ has mixed opinions, some people weren't impressed, the transfer does contain edge enhancement, crushed blacks etc but the movie has a specific look which I think the Blu-ay portrays excellently, plus there is TONS of detail and imo an overall great transfer, I was delighted with it. It's overall one of my favorite Blu-rays, I would recommend buying it.
2) How is the transfer for 2001 and NCfOM? (I already know I want the movies; I was just wondering what the PQ is like)
PQ on both is outstanding. 2001 is probably the best transfer out of any "old" film released. You will be shocked how amazing it looks. NCFOM is reference quality, plain and simple. It's not really the perfect setting to show off Blu-ray but the PQ is pretty much perfect, Id rate it as the best one I own
3) What extras does the Blu Ray version of Ratatouille have the original does not? Are they worth buying it again for?
I dont own it personally but here's a review that details it's extras: http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1048/ratatouille.html
It's supposed to be one of the most complete Blu-ray releases to date, in terms of movie quality, PQ, AQ and extras.
Thanks in advance for your guys' help.
GuessWho said:how early? i can't find it.
DeathNote said:DVD 2.0 Format Specification
1. Video encoded in MPEG2 SD
2. HD available via Super Upconversion to 960p
3. HDi interactivity
4. Networking
5. Managed Copy
6. Fully backward compatible with existing DVD players.
:lol
If you have the DVD, there should be a rebate form in there for $10 back if you buy the Blu-ray release. It's good until the end of May, IIRC.traveler said:Wait. They have a commentary for Ratatouille and it's only on the Blu Ray disc? Well, shit, Disney, that's friggin awful.
Now I have to buy your product twice.
DeathNote said:DVD 2.0 Format Specification
1. Video encoded in MPEG2 SD
2. HD available via Super Upconversion to 960p
3. HDi interactivity
4. Networking
5. Managed Copy
6. Fully backward compatible with existing DVD players.
:lol
JB1981 said:speaking of scaling, has Sony improved the scaling with firmware updates, 'cause 'i'm watching the kingdom on dvd right now and it looks fantastic - like almost HD in places.
onix's link said:Basically, its for people looking for the most accurate image as compared to the original source material. On most material, I do find it subtly crisper but that is a bit hard to verify since the image size is smaller. Once I get a front-projector, I think this will be especially interesting to mess around with
NYTimes Article on Blu-Ray. It almost reads like a PR piece.