• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Last Guardian PS4 vs PS4 Pro Graphics Comparison + Frame-Rate Test

I've seen quite a few videos showcasing what seems to be a single digit frame rate. I guess it's a bug then? Or at least something that doesn't happen all that often in 20 was the lowest DF saw.
 
I don't understand these sub-30 fps 4k modes. If you are getting frame drops below 30 fps, why aren't they rendering at 1600p and doing checkerboard thing instead of 1800/1900p?
 
I have the game preordered AND payed but I'm really wondering if I should just resell it immediately, to maximize profit. I love Ueda and his games, and this saddens me to no end, but 20/25fps all around is not an acceptable performance to me, nowadays, and playing at such performance would just frustrate me (yeeeeah I know Ico and Colossus ran worse.... I know). I'll leave the game unopened for the first week and see if Sony patches it.
I know this is not going to be the gold standard since Japan Studio's never been all that proficient in the technical side of things, and buying a Pro just to stabilise the frame rate for this game if out of the question. I just hope this trend does not become a standard for the rest of the generation. Really leaves a sour taste about this whole midgen thing. People will not be left behind, but I guess if people have certain stardards they will sometimes be left behind. It's not "more stable frame rates" Cerny told us about, it's about fixing insufficient frame rates instead. Those are not frame drops, goddamit, the entire game looks to be sub-25fps according to DF video.
Point is, we shouldn't be here speaking about this. This is a sony first party exclusive, it's beyond belief it shipped in such a state.
 
Probably a CPU issue, often you can bump up resolution since that's more GPU dependant

If it was a CPU issue then the 1080p mode would have the same drops.
 
This is the unfortunate reality we live in. If you vote against the Pro with your wallet, you end up playing games at worse quality, so you kinda have to buy the Pro, but then you are basically giving Sony the message that releasing mid-gen refreshes is OK.

You can't win.
 
Framerate comes first don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

When the frame rate is this low, i can see the arguement.

My problem is that the 4k mode still does the 30 fps, and without playing it i dont onow how often or how noticable it feels when it drops,

I will need to play it to see, but its a shame its a pita to switch back and forth.
 
I have the game preordered AND payed but I'm really wondering if I should just resell it immediately, to maximize profit. I love Ueda and his games, and this saddens me to no end, but 20/25fps all around is not an acceptable performance to me, nowadays, and playing at such performance would just frustrate me (yeeeeah I know Ico and Colossus ran worse.... I know). I'll leave the game unopened for the first week and see if Sony patches it.
I know this is not going to be the gold standard since Japan Studio's never been all that proficient in the technical side of things, and buying a Pro just to stabilise the frame rate for this game if out of the question. I just hope this trend does not become a standard for the rest of the generation. Really leaves a sour taste about this whole midgen thing. People will not be left behind, but I guess if people have certain stardards they will sometimes be left behind. It's not "more stable frame rates" Cerny told us about, it's about fixing insufficient frame rates instead. Those are not frame drops, goddamit, the entire game looks to be sub-25fps according to DF video.
Point is, we shouldn't be here speaking about this. This is a sony first party exclusive, it's beyond belief it shipped in such a state.

It's beyond belief it shipped at all tbh. I'm speaking from a place of privilege because I have the Pro, but I'm just happy that come tomorrow it'll be a post TLG world.
 
theres not enough of a difference in frame rate between 1080pro and 4kpro to not play in 4k if you have the tv...
 
I just watched the video again, this time trying my damnedest not to look at the frame counters. There are times where I can tell a difference, but it's not detrimental, and for the most part, all three versions look pretty much identical to me performance-wise. I think that in any mode, I'd enjoy this game. It might run best on the Pro at 1080, but whatever... I'm playing it at 4K.
 
This is the unfortunate reality we live in. If you vote against the Pro with your wallet, you end up playing games at worse quality, so you kinda have to buy the Pro, but then you are basically giving Sony the message that releasing mid-gen refreshes is OK.

You can't win.

This game would run shitty on the PS4 even if the Pro didn't exist. The Pro is just giving some of us the option avoid the poor performance.
 
Sterling said the AI is absolutely atrocious. So presumably...very little? idk.
He doesn't know what he's talking about. Computations involved in getting something like this going are not just incredibly complex, but also never really done before, so it's not like there was some kind of benchmark example set that could be copied.

theres not enough of a difference in frame rate between 1080pro and 4kpro to not play in 4k if you have the tv...
From the video, it seems that way - but still IMO they should have maybe rendered it at 1600, to keep the framerate higher.
 
This is the unfortunate reality we live in. If you vote against the Pro with your wallet, you end up playing games at worse quality, so you kinda have to buy the Pro, but then you are basically giving Sony the message that releasing mid-gen refreshes is OK.

You can't win.

I wonder what other games run like shit on the OG PS4 besides TLG, which in fact, runs more or less at 30 PFS even on the PRO @ 4K (the reason most buyers have bought it anyway).

You're generalizing.

He doesn't know what he's talking about. Computations involved in getting something like this going are not just incredibly complex, but also never really done before, so it's not like there was some kind of benchmark example set that could be copied.

Sterling is the definition of whining.
 
Ahhh feels good to have a Pro!

It's why I picked one up immediately.

I would rather the edge on every game starting now. Not 10 or 20 games from now.

Anyways. This game does run like trash in 4k mode. You feel the sluggish.

The good news is if you do put into 1080p mode it looks and runs great.
 
I bought a Pro at launch, but wasn't sure if i'd made the right choice as a 1080p screen user. Rich offered to buy it off me actually (I had it preordered in case we needed another machine at launch for DF work) - but after doing these TLG tests I'm happy to keep it.

The Last Guardian's frame-rate isn't going to bother everyone. After all Shadow of the Colossus was an amazing game on PS2 despite its frame-rate issues - and that logic follows on standard PS4 here. But given the option for a smoother frame-rate, for me, it just makes sense to take it.
 
Like he has a clue. It seeming bad to him doesn't have any bearing on what's going on under the hood.

I have to agree here. I like Sterling's videos on stuff but his reviews are generally kinda eh.

I'm a huge fan of Ico and SotC but as someone who doesn't own a PS4 Pro I feel inclined to skipped this. Someone dun fucked up.
 
I have to agree here. I like Sterling's videos on stuff but his reviews are generally kinda eh.

I'm a huge fan of Ico and SotC but as someone who doesn't own a PS4 Pro I feel inclined to skipped this. Someone dun fucked up.

If you really are a "huge fan" of SoTC you would be fine with dips from 30. SotC was almost always in the 20s. And even the HD remaster was not a stable 30.
 
I waited 7 years for this game. Shadow of the Colossus was a masterpiece, probably in my top 10.

I almost let all the negativity get to me and almost cancelled my pre-order but you know what screw that Im still getting it! Amazon release day delivery pls
 
This is the unfortunate reality we live in. If you vote against the Pro with your wallet, you end up playing games at worse quality, so you kinda have to buy the Pro, but then you are basically giving Sony the message that releasing mid-gen refreshes is OK.

You can't win.

This becomes an issue when games are targeting the performance of PS4 Pro and not the PS4. Like Dark10x said, the underlying issues are likely within the engine, and not because the game is pushing too many visual effects.

Here's the thing, though. Performance on consoles began to get pretty poor near the end of the generation on PS3/360. The games were running at sub 720p, with poor frame rates, and assets below the low setting on PC.

That's going to happen to the base PS4, too. Perhaps sooner than the PS3/360. The Pro is going to help bridge that gap and avoid low quality late gen ports for those who don't want that. It got frustrating being a console gamer towards the later end of the generation when its clear that these consoles were out on the market for so long. Expect the PS4 to have a long life. It's awfully successful.
 
I don't understand these sub-30 fps 4k modes. If you are getting frame drops below 30 fps, why aren't they rendering at 1600p and doing checkerboard thing instead of 1800/1900p?
Think about what you're saying. For base PS4 users, the game runs at a specific framerate. The devs obviously thought that was acceptable. For Pro users at 4K, the game runs better than that. Why would the dev find that suddenly unacceptable?
 
Sterling said the AI is absolutely atrocious. So presumably...very little? idk.

Is Sterling's words taken as gospel around here? I have to ask because I have seen so many people quoting him on Gaf today regarding Last Guardian a.i issues, whilst ignoring other reviewers who had a different take on this same aspect.
 
If you really are a "huge fan" of SoTC you would be fine with dips from 30. SotC was almost always in the 20s. And even the HD remaster was not a stable 30.

I don't recall the HD remaster having that many dips.

Would rather you not make this into a weird thing personally questioning whether or not I'm a fan of a game. I've become more and more sensitive to framerates since I was a teen and I find 20-25 fps to be kinda ridiculous. I'd rather wait til I can play it the optimal way rather than play a subpar version.
 
If you really are a "huge fan" of SoTC you would be fine with dips from 30. SotC was almost always in the 20s. And even the HD remaster was not a stable 30.

I'm not gonna be "fine" with dips below 30 fps. And this is coming from someone for whom SoTC is in his top 5.

I'm going to play TLG and (hopefully) like it, but I'll still be grumpy about the performance.
 
Never seen a worse looking game, in this gen or the last. wow.

giphy.gif
 
This is the unfortunate reality we live in. If you vote against the Pro with your wallet, you end up playing games at worse quality, so you kinda have to buy the Pro, but then you are basically giving Sony the message that releasing mid-gen refreshes is OK.

You can't win.

Technically you can just buy a PS5 and play these games then.
 
Is Sterling's words taken as gospel around here? I have to ask because I have seen so many people quoting him on Gaf today regarding Last Guardian a.i issues, whilst ignoring other reviewers who had a different take on this same aspect.

I love Jim but this is the same guy who said Xenoblade X's best feature was it's music. You can't trust everything he says. He's a weird dude.
 
To think Mark Cerny could have used his technical genius to fix the frame rate in The Last Guardian, but instead he selfishly insisted on creating Knack 2. He needs to be held accountable.

Knack's framerate was garbage at launch and is still garbage on the pro.
This is all Cerny's fault!
 
Top Bottom