• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The morality and ethics of being a home-wrecker

Status
Not open for further replies.
Being a home wrecker seems to build in a big obligation into the new relationship right from the beginning.

"I know you left your husband for me about a week ago, but I don't think this is going to work out. Sorry."

Who wants to deal with a burden like that?
 
This thread made me think of this.

TL;DR Gaffer has feelings for someone that is married and has children.

Say he - gaffer - goes ahead and tell her about his feelings, and something ignites in her and she reveals her feelings to him too. She leaves her husband and now these two are together.

Decades later..

They are still together, happily married with children. Her ex-husband also found someone else and he is also happily married.

Both couples hold no grudges, and the children are not traumatized.


Still, is he in the wrong? Is this not right? I can't decide on a definitive answer.

One could say it will depend on variables too.

I stated that everyone is 'O.K' and happy, but if even one of the children, or the ex-husband become depressed due to it, would it then become wrong? If no children are involved, would it be even less wrong?

Not likely to happen, unless the children are infants and can't recall much of anything when both parents were together. Even if they are adult children, they will likely hold a grudge against the parent who broke up their family.
 
Adultery is morally and ethically wrong.

There aren't many who would disagree with you. I certainly don't disagree with the sentence above.

You propose to enforce your views on a population that doesn't agree with you. It puts you on a moral and ethical high ground...that doesn't work in reality. The fact that you're two steps shy of the scarlet letter is what's scary.

There are plenty of couples who (gasp) work through their issues and understand that adultery is about any number of issues between the couple, not the kids. In fact, some couples even come out of it stronger than before, becoming better parents, spouses, lovers and contributors to the family as a whole.

Your stance on there being criminal or legally imposed punishment with this is arcane, and it is also morally and ethically wrong.
 
If you're unhappy you get a fucking divorce.

Once a cheat always a cheat.

Your divorce can be contested and you can be forced to live with someone you want as far away from you as possible due to economic and legal concerns. What then? Black and white only works for photos and film, not thinking.
 
Sure, "time heals all wounds" and people feel fine about consequences of an action from years earlier, but during those times -- 20 years before or whenever -- it's absolute hell for people involved.

I say, home wrecking is bad. I don't think it's as bad as cheating, but it's up there.
 
Being a home wrecker seems to build in a big obligation into the new relationship right from the beginning.

"I know you left your husband for me about a week ago, but I don't think this is going to work out. Sorry."

Who wants to deal with a burden like that?

Happened to a friend of mine. His wife left him and their 2 boys ages 10 and 12 and moved in with another guy. That lasted about a month before new boyfriend kicked her out and then she came crawling back on her hands and knees begging him to forgive her. He told her to fuck off and they got divorced. He and the boys moved on while her life is still a total wreck a year later.

I don't blame him for not taking her back. You could never fully trust someone like that again.

I'm also curious as to what makes a homewrecker think that the person you are cheating with will remain faithful to them. Clearly, the person has the propensity to cheat and has no problems breaking up his/her family to get what they want, so what the hell makes a homewrecker think that it won't happen to them at some point in the future? You think all of a sudden a magical moral compass will appear on this person once they get with you?
 
Humans gonna human.

I have no qualms with the "homewrecker" in any given scenario. They aren't obligated to uphold someone else's bond.

However, honesty is obviously an issue.. and if the person they are after is being dishonest with their S/O, that's something they should take into account.

Black and white statements like "If they cheated on **** they'll cheat on you".. or "once a cheater, always a cheater" however are silly.

Sometimes it's just how people find love.. through making mistakes.

Clearly, the person has the propensity to cheat and has no problems breaking up his/her family to get what they want, so what the hell makes a homewrecker think that it won't happen to them at some point in the future? You think all of a sudden a magical moral compass will appear on this person once they get with you?

People make mistakes.. not every relationship is the same.. sometimes people in unhappy relationships have trouble ending them, etc.

It's something to take into account for sure.. but it's not like people can't change.. and when someone cheats, it's often about the relationship they are in.. not just simply some "propensity to cheat."

I'd say the biggest concern would be that the person is willing to stay in relationships they clearly aren't happy in. A lot of cheaters surprise the shit out of their significant others because they also lied about their level of happiness.
 
And its disgusting that there are people who are actually cheering him on. If it was anyone else, people would be calling that person out.

My views are, as the home-wrecker, that I'm not the one who took a vow or committed.to a relationship with some dude I probably won't meet. Though, I will say I would never have a long term relationship with a married or otherwise taken person.
 
My views are, as the home-wrecker, that I'm not the one who took a vow or committed.to a relationship with some dude I probably won't meet. Though, I will say I would never have a long term relationship with a married or otherwise taken person.

In this situation, it's not being involved with someone who is in a relationship, its bragging about it and then having people on the forum praise it. As I said,
imagine if someone else admitted to it, people would be going off.
 
I don't think I could do it, I'd feel too much guilt.

I know if someone is going to cheat they will probably do it regardless though.

I'd feel guilty just having sex with a married woman after we had sex.

Unless her husband was filming it than its all good.
 
Aren't homewreckers worried that the significant other would come after them violently? That was always a big concern for me as to why I wouldn't do it.
 
Aren't homewreckers worried that the significant other would come after them violently? That was always a big concern for me as to why I wouldn't do it.

It certainly happens.

I would never go after some dude for hooking up with my girlfriend.. so it's not something on my mind.

But I've been attacked for it before.. more than once. But I'm 6'4" and pretty beefcake, so it hasn't always turned out too well for the guys attacking me.
 
Aren't homewreckers worried that the significant other would come after them violently? That was always a big concern for me as to why I wouldn't do it.
Son, that's what we use hotels for. The dude's unlikely to find out unless he's the obsessive, controlling type. However, it's then likely the relationship is doomed anyway so you could probably just wait it out in that case.
 
Son, that's what we use hotels for. The dude's unlikely to find out unless he's the obsessive, controlling type. However, it's then likely the relationship is doomed anyway so you could probably just wait it out in that case.

Keep thinking that until Richard Gere shows up at your apartment and hits you in the face with a snow globe.
 
Even if, in the future, the children seem "happy" you will never have any way of knowing how your actions may have effected their lives. It's undeniable that you will have made their lives more difficult for at least a portion, and probably lead to at least a temporary measure of suffering.
 
Put yourself in the other guy's/girl's shoes that's being cheating on. How would you feel then?
What size and what brand? If he's got itty bitty foot-binding feet, then that might be a problem.
 
Just have the scars and bruises that go with advanced training in martial arts

If I grabbed your ass and showed you my


_blue_belt_ranking.gif



Would you come home with me?
 
If a guy finds out you are cheating with his wife, he could find out a lot of things about you before you even know. He could know what you look like, where you live, what you drive and you probably don't even know his name unless your fucking your buddies wife or girlfriend.

Think about it. If you don't think the majority of guys would act violently to someone fucking their wife I think you are probably mistaken and if you think they will never find out unless they're obsessive I think you're wrong about that too.

Its pretty easy to slip up and get caught if you live with someone. Act a little different and he might get suspicious.
 
You can rationalize it any way you want but in the end you're still breaking up a family and the kids will probably suffer for it.
 
Fair enough but there is a big difference between being married and cheating and just dating and cheating.
good to see traditional christian family values are in full effect.

anything other than being legally married=just dating. no biggie.
 
And you do know that the guy your girl is going to cheat on you with is probably going to say the same thing about you.

It's easy to say that, but without knowing the particulars of the situation you really don't know. It may be that way in the future, but right now I'm quite happy and she's quite happy. *shrug*
 
It's easy to say that, but without knowing the particulars of the situation you really don't know. It may be that way in the future, but right now I'm quite happy and she's quite happy. *shrug*

I hope it works out for you but that's how cheaters rationalize their cheating, it's the other persons fault, I had reasons to cheat only to go on and cheat again because it was so easy the first couple of times they did it.
 
There is no such thing as "home wreckers". One partner always chooses to abandon their commitment to the other. The blame always lies with the party who breaks their commitment.
 
Even if, in the future, the children seem "happy" you will never have any way of knowing how your actions may have effected their lives. It's undeniable that you will have made their lives more difficult for at least a portion, and probably lead to at least a temporary measure of suffering.

People who cheat, aren't likely to have been in some healthy relationship in the first place.

I grew up with 2 parents who probably should have divorced long before they did.. my Dad apparently cheated on my Mom when I was a kid even, but neither of them wanted the "shame" of a divorce.

Their unhappiness contributed to years of mental and physical abuse of their children, which they had very little ability to comprehend. It was only after they divorced that they (well at least my Dad) was able to look back and recall and realize how much damage his unhappy ass had done "staying with" my Mom so many years.

My point being: it's really just not that black and white.. simply "staying together" doesn't necessarily do something great for your children. Cheating should be avoided obviously, and on it's own is clearly an immoral act, but that doesn't make it morally wrong to express interest in someone who is married, or in particular if they have kids.

Those actions could be a catalyst for change.. and that change can result in numerous side effects.

Anyone becoming a parent should be PREPARED to handle a potential change in their relationship status with the other parent involved.. and should really keep a keen on on ensuring they are in a HEALTHY relationship with that person, not just ensuring they stay in the SAME relationship with that person.
 
I hope it works out for you but that's how cheaters rationalize their cheating, it's the other persons fault, I had reasons to cheat only to go on and cheat again because it was so easy the first couple of times they did it.
There was no cheating involved though.
 
Son, that's what we use hotels for. The dude's unlikely to find out unless he's the obsessive, controlling type. However, it's then likely the relationship is doomed anyway so you could probably just wait it out in that case.

The dude is unlikely to find out if he's a complete fucking idiot when it comes to today's technology.

I have another friend who caught her husband AT the motel with another woman. She suspected for a while that he was cheating on her, so she hid her iPhone in the trunk of his car for a couple of days and tracked him with the Find My iPhone app from her iPad. Took her right to the hotel where they were at and she saw his car in the parking lot.
 
It's cheating to admit to someone other than your partner that you have feelings for them? (but not act on it?)

I agree that the likely result that follows from these events is either going to be cheating, or a bumpy road for the existing relationship (including a probable reevaluation of the relationship or a breakup). But I mean, there's something profoundly sad to me about two people who legitimately wind up feeling something strongly for each other not being able to think about things and change the course of their futures without it being regarded as cheating.

People fall in and out of love all the time. The responsible thing to do is respect the rules of your existing relationship and be honest with your partner if something's changed.
 
There is no cheating going on in the OP's scenario.

I personally say, tell her your feelings. Life's too short not to follow your heart. Chances are she is happily married. If she is interested then she needs to get her relationship status, etc. completely in check before you take any further actions.

That being said, I would certainly check your feelings and be sure that you aren't enamored, infatuated, or whatever before possibly throwing a wrench into the lives of a family with children.
 
What about this scenario?

Theres a couple who are besotted with another but one cheats and falls for another person, that other person also falls for him/her all the while the married couple are still in love with each other?

Is that possible?
 
One of the main differences between us and animals is our self control. Would you ever trust anyone who cheats in marriage. Fatally flawed character they are and such people cannot be trusted in life
 
What about this scenario?

Theres a couple who are besotted with another but one cheats and falls for another person, that other person also falls for him/her all the while the married couple are still in love with each other?

Is that possible?

Is it possible for someone to be in love with more than one person? Of course.
 
I don't like the term "homewrecker."

To me, the responsibility of cheating falls 100% on the cheater and not the person they cheated with. The cheater is the real homewrecker.


If you are an attractive woman, or a good-looking, confident guy you will get hit on by the opposite sex. It's totally unavoidable (especially for hot females), unless you are a hermit living in a cave. If the person is selfish enough to throw away their relationship/children/family/whatever for lust then that's all on them IMO. It also usually doesn't bode well for the future relationship with their new partner if they are that type of fickle person that could just leave on a whim.

I'm not sure I agree with this. Cheating spouses are usually unhappy spouses. What if the spouse was treated like dirt before the cheating incident and this poor treatment, to some degree, precipitated the affair?

Edit: As left-leaning as GAF tends to be is I'm honestly shocked that so many consider "cheating" immoral. Certainly seems odd to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom