• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The New Yorker - How Jokes Won the Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/23/how-jokes-won-the-election

How do you fight an enemy who's just kidding?

Since November 9th, we've heard a lot of talk about unreality, and how what's normal bends when you're in a state of incipient autocracy. There's been a lot written about gaslighting (lies that make you feel crazy) and the rise of fake news (hoaxes that displace facts), and much analysis of Trump as a reality star (an authentic phony). But what killed me last year were the jokes, because I love jokes—dirty jokes, bad jokes, rude jokes, jokes that cut through bullshit and explode pomposity. Growing up a Jewish kid in the nineteen-seventies, in a house full of Holocaust books, giggling at Mel Brooks's ”The Producers," I had the impression that jokes, like Woody Guthrie's guitar, were a machine that killed fascists. Comedy might be cruel or stupid, yet, in aggregate, it was the rebel's stance. Nazis were humorless. The fact that it was mostly men who got to tell the jokes didn't bother me. Jokes were a superior way to tell the truth—that meant freedom for everyone.

But by 2016 the wheel had spun hard the other way: now it was the neo-fascist strongman who held the microphone and an army of anonymous dirty-joke dispensers who helped put him in office. Online, jokes were powerful accelerants for lies—a tweet was the size of a one-liner, a ”dank meme" carried farther than any op-ed, and the distinction between a Nazi and someone pretending to be a Nazi for ”lulz" had become a blur. Ads looked like news and so did propaganda and so did actual comedy, on both the right and the left—and every combination of the four was labelled ”satire." In a perverse twist, Trump may even have run for President as payback for a comedy routine: Obama's lacerating takedown of him at the 2011 White House Correspondents' Dinner. By the campaign's final days, the race felt driven less by policy disputes than by an ugly war of disinformation, one played for laughs. How do you fight an enemy who's just kidding?

It was an image that felt impossible to decode, outside the sphere of ordinary politics. But Literal Hitler was an inside joke, destabilizing by design; as with any subcultural code, from camp to hip-hop, it was crafted to confuse outsiders. The phrase emerged on Tumblr to mock people who made hyperbolic comparisons to Hitler, often ones about Obama. Then it morphed, as jokes did so quickly last year, into a weapon that might be used to mock any comparisons to Hitler—even when a guy with a serious Hitler vibe ran for President, even when the people using the phrase were cavorting with Nazis. Literal Hitler was one of a thousand such memes, flowing from anonymous Internet boards that were founded a decade ago, a free universe that was crude and funny and juvenile and anarchic by design, a teen-age-boy safe space. The original version of this model surfaced in Japan, on the ”imageboard" 2chan. Then, in 2003, a teen-ager named Christopher Poole launched 4chan—and when the crudest users got booted they migrated to 8chan, and eventually to ********. For years, those places had mobbed and hacked their ideological enemies, often feminists, but they also competed for the filthiest, most outrageous bit, the champion being whatever might shock an unshockable audience. The only winning move was not to react.

In ”An Establishment Conservative's Guide to the Alt-Right," two writers for Breitbart mapped out the alt-right movement as a patchwork of ideologies: there were ”the Intellectuals," ”the Natural Conservatives," men's-rights types, earnest white supremacists and anti-Semites (whom the authors shrug off as a humorless minority), and then the many invisible others—the jokers, the virtual writers' room, punching up one another's gags. In Breitbart's take, this was merely payback for the rigidity of identity politics. ”If you spend 75 years building a pseudo-religion around anything—an ethnic group, a plaster saint, sexual chastity or the Flying Spaghetti Monster—don't be surprised when clever 19-year-olds discover that insulting it is now the funniest fucking thing in the world," the article states. ”Because it is."

Two thousand sixteen was the year that those inside jokes were released in the wild. Despite the breeziness of Breitbart's description, there was in fact a global army of trolls, not unlike the ones shown on ”South Park," who were eagerly ”shit-posting" on Trump's behalf, their harassment an anonymous version of the ”rat-fucking" that used to be the province of paid fixers. Like Trump's statements, their quasi-comical memeing and name-calling was so destabilizing, flipping between serious and silly, that it warped the boundaries of discourse. ”We memed a President into existence," Chuck Johnson, a troll who had been banned from Twitter, bragged after the election. These days, he's reportedly consulting on appointments at the White House.

Really interesting piece imo. Really goes into a lot of normal facets played a part in the election cycle.
meme this thread if old

edit: Oh in that third paragraph the website's domain is blocked on GAF, for good reason. im sure you can figure it out.
 

shagia

Member
And people will still deny up and down that internet culture had anything to do with the election.

which is shocking to see people do, really. Political involvement on the internet really grew far in the past decade, from Howard Dean reciving donations from online users, to Barrack Obama advertising his campaign on Youtube, to now, where irony blurred the lines of sincerity
 

Phobophile

A scientist and gentleman in the manner of Batman.
Bump since I had this thread open since last night and it's a good article.

I think the election was a joke, but i didn't find it very funny.

Maybe you don't like jokes that are mean-spirited and targeted at disenfranchised people or at even specific individuals. The article even brings up that if you try confronting the jokester, they almost always have some out and you're still made the fool if you play along.
 
And people will still deny up and down that internet culture had anything to do with the election.

"It's just a cartoon frog! Stop saying it's a white supremacist symbol just because it's used primarily by white supremacists to spread white supremacist messaging! They're just dank memes!"
 

Metal B

Member
This also happens in this very forum. The first page of many thread is dominated by jokes. This often changes the atmosphere and perception for the rest of a thread.
 

.JayZii

Banned
This also happens in this very forum. The first page of many thread is dominated by jokes. This often changes the atmosphere and perception for the rest of a thread.
Gotta frantically rifle through that gif folder and get those licks in.
 

Ferrio

Banned
This also happens in this very forum. The first page of many thread is dominated by jokes. This often changes the atmosphere and perception for the rest of a thread.

I'm really tired of seeing "but her emails" over and over. It's not funny or clever, yes we know people are idiots how about we actually discuss it instead of one line quips?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom