what Kimi is trying to prevent
This meme hurts me.
what Kimi is trying to prevent
A meme that causes an emotion even if a negative one is considered true art in my eyesThis meme hurts me.
edit for above: NX is not an hybrid.
A point I'm not sure anyone has made, but the value of the console is probably more important than the specs/price.
Wii U didn't sell poorly because it was weak, it sold poorly because it was weak and it launched at $350.
3DS sold pretty well all things considered but it wasn't perceived as valuable at its $250 launch.
If it's weak but $250 people would be more interested in it. Same as if it was expensive but very powerful at $350-400
Console is gonna cost $400 for sure.
The leaps to conclusions in this thread are astounding.
Basically. If an iOS or android like system is used then that might be enough to sell a lot of people on it.Yeah that seems to be the correlation between power and price. I think the deciding factor is Nintendo's software strategy, what they end up with on the hardware side depends on which audience they mainly want to attract to NX.
The leaps to conclusions in this thread are astounding.
How much was the PS4 selling at in 2014 though?
I would be perfectly content with a 399 Machine that matches PS4K/Neo. Nintendo needs to have a competitively spec'd system. They can't afford to have another WiiU situation.
I wouldn't put any stock in this quote. Even if he knew the NX was going to sell at a huge loss, he would have said the same thing. I wouldn't even count on the NX releasing in March.
Why does selling at a profit suddenly equate to being underpowered?
Nintendo should make a console twice as powerful as PS4 and sell it at $200 loss. To make that $200 back, every NX game should only be digital so that they can make a larger percentage on each game sold.
A point I'm not sure anyone has made, but the value of the console is probably more important than the specs/price.
Wii U didn't sell poorly because it was weak, it sold poorly because it was weak and it launched at $350.
3DS sold pretty well all things considered but it wasn't perceived as valuable at its $250 launch.
3DS is the weakest system since the PS2 but a lot of people appreciate its low price and extensive library.
If it's weak but $250 people would be more interested in it. Same as if it was expensive but very powerful at $350-400
A meme that causes an emotion even if a negative one is considered true art in my eyes
Nintendo should make a console twice as powerful as PS4 and sell it at $200 loss. To make that $200 back, every NX game should only be digital so that they can make a larger percentage on each game sold.
Why does selling at a profit suddenly equate to being underpowered?
Depends what they're going for. I think that's handheld pricesI'd say that $250 isn't low enough for this gen. More like $200 or less.
lolque? Even if they were to take this route, anything more than a $50 loss ($350 price) would make no sense whatsoever
Doesn't seem like it would be difficult to sell a say $299 console not at a loss, and be more powerful than the over 3 year old PS4, so I'm not sure what the worry is.
Or were people expecting Nintendo to release a system even more powerful than the PS4K and still have competitive pricing?
If it's releasing in the same timeframe as the ps4k it's only natural for people to expect it to be at least close to that spec.
uhh no? Pretty sure you wouldn't want to lie to investors over something that you can control like that. March date is suspect, that quote no.
This is stupid.Nintendo should make a console twice as powerful as PS4 and sell it at $200 loss. To make that $200 back, every NX game should only be digital so that they can make a larger percentage on each game sold.
The PS4 & XB1's install base is too big to ignore, so it's not like those two are going anywhere anytime soon. As long as the NX Console is within the ballpark of those two, Nintendo will be fine. Plus Emily Rogers kinda already shot down the hopes of those wanting the NX Console to compete with the PS4K.I would be perfectly content with a 399 Machine that matches PS4K/Neo. Nintendo needs to have a competitively spec'd system. They can't afford to have another WiiU situation.
Do you want Nintendo receive XB1-tier backlash? Because that's how you get XB1-tier backlash.Nintendo should make a console twice as powerful as PS4 and sell it at $200 loss. To make that $200 back, every NX game should only be digital so that they can make a larger percentage on each game sold.
Depends what they're going for. I think that's handheld prices
The PS4 & XB1's install base is too big to ignore, so it's not like those two are going anywhere anytime soon. As long as the NX Console is within the ballpark of those two, Nintendo will be fine. Plus Emily Rogers kinda already shot down the hopes of those wanting the NX Console to compete with the PS4K.
Do you want Nintendo receive XB1-tier backlash? Because that's how you get XB1-tier backlash.
She didn't say anything about the power level being disappointing.
If you consider a recent price analysis of consoles launching at their respective price points and being sold at a loss at launch, it's sort of hard to imagine a scenario of a console being significantly more powerful than the ps4, launching at 299 or 349, and it's sort of hard to imagine nintendo launching anything at $399. It's not impossible to have a $249 - $349 system beating the ps4 significantly, but considerably more difficult. And if it isn't significantly more powerful than the ps4, it will be underpowered with a 2017 launch given ps4k and and xbox revision and or xbox 2 launching somewhere near that timeframe.
It's not absurd for people to think it's essentially a wii u scenario all over again in terms of power.
It wouldn't be a Wii U scenario [in terms of power] because developers will still have to take in account original Xbox One and PS4 customers. Which, hypothetically, the NX should be able to handle.
Feels like this has been pretty well explained multiple times in this thread.
Feels like this has been pretty well explained multiple times in this thread.
$250 might be enough to match Xbone, but it would be extremely close and Nintendo would need to deal with higher power consumption since 14nm is pretty much out of the question.
If you consider a recent price analysis of consoles launching at their respective price points and being sold at a loss at launch, it's sort of hard to imagine a scenario of a console being significantly more powerful than the ps4, launching at 299 or 349, and it's sort of hard to imagine nintendo launching anything at $399. It's not impossible to have a $249 - $349 system beating the ps4 significantly, but considerably more difficult. And if it isn't significantly more powerful than the ps4, it will be underpowered with a 2017 launch given ps4k and and xbox revision and or xbox 2 launching somewhere near that timeframe.
It's not absurd for people to think it's essentially a wii u scenario all over again in terms of power.
Arguably devs still had to take into account the 360 and ps3, as the wii u launched in 2012. Look how that turned out. If new systems launch it remains to be seen how long devs will support the last gen. Additionally, the 360 and ps3 arguably still have better 3rd party support than the wii u, so launching a system only as powerfull as the last gen doesn't inspire confidence in devs that you will grow a sizable userbase. Case in point, the wii u. It's literally the almost same scenario. Hey video gamers, please buy our system that doesn't offer anything the systems that released several years ago already do. Please understand. It doesn't inspire confidence in the strength of the long term appeal for the system, which leads too a lack of 3rd party support. If it's doubtful you will grow a sizable user base, it's doubtful the devs are going to come.
And those arguments are incredibly poor.
Why?
Iwata said repeatedly that they can't compete with Sony and MS on a hardware level.
I don't think these are incredibly poor.